Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sharks player ratings vs Leinster | 2023 URC quarter-final

(Photo by Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Sharks players ratings live from Aviva Stadium: The South African franchise came to Dublin looking to cause a major URC upset against a Leinster team last beaten at home 11 months ago by the Bulls. That 2022 semi-final took place a few hundred yards along the Shelbourne Road, the RDS the scene of that famed ambushing of the four-in-a-row PRO16 champions which set up an all-South African final won by the Stormers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The booking of ‘The Boss’ Bruce Springsteen for a three-night residency at the RDS this week meant it was at Aviva Stadium where the top-seeded Leinster staged their latest URC knockout fixture and the odds coming in were very much against the eighth-ranked Sharks.

Bad enough that their form in this comp had been frustratingly inconsistent, the ledger showing just two wins in their last seven trips – including a 54-34 regular season loss at Leinster. But they also woundingly arrived minus injured giants Eben Etzebeth and Siyi Kolisi.

Video Spacer

John Plumtree on the travel factor for South African teams

Video Spacer

John Plumtree on the travel factor for South African teams

Next season the Sharks will have John Plumtree, the former Ireland and All Blacks assistant, at the helm as head coach. But this particular XV under the baton of Neil Powell, who will step upstairs to the director of rugby role, didn’t have the required bite to ask enough questions of Leinster.

The hosts’ selection was hugely rejigged from last weekend’s Heineken Champions Cup semi-final win over Toulouse, the team that had baited the Sharks 54-20 last month in France in the quarter-finals of that tournament.

These Sharks weren’t toothless – the early solo try brilliantly scored by Grant Williams demonstrated that. However, once Leinster found their mojo, they were unstoppable, a momentum abetted by the scoring of two first-half tries with Makazole Mapimpi in the sin bin.

That meant a 5-21 interval deficit and the margin only increased in the second half, Leinster’s fourth try on 51 minutes putting the result to bed before a fifth five minutes from time pushed the gap to 30, the travelling South Africans losing 5-35. Here are the Sharks player ratings:

ADVERTISEMENT

15. Aphelele Fassi – 4
Started tidily but came unstuck with the lame attempted tackle on the try-scoring Jordan Larmour on 24 minutes. That was way too soft a giveaway at this level, failing to readjust his footing to put a decent hit in. Wasn’t generally aggressive enough when it mattered. Look at his ‘I surrender’ attitude when faced with the two-on-one for Leinster’s fourth try.

14. Marnus Potgieter – 4.5
Began with a good cover tackle on Ciaran Frawley early on, but that was about the height of it on an evening when Leinster’s quick attack was a dominant factor.

13. Lukhanyo Am – 5
Skipper in the absence of twin totems Kolisi and Etzebeth, he was very quiet and couldn’t wield the necessary leadership to ensure his team made a decent fist of this gigantic challenge.

12. Ben Tapuai – 5
The former Harlequins centre, who is on his way to Bordeaux next term, was eclipsed by opposite number Charlie Ngatai during his 57 minutes on the pitch. His replacement Rohan Janse van Rensburg thought he had grabbed a consolation eight minutes from time but foul play elsewhere scrubbed that out.

ADVERTISEMENT

11. Makazole Mapimpi – 4.5
Sin-binned on 14 minutes for the head-high fashion with which he tried to stop Doris from scoring, two tries were conceded in his absence. That leakage was critical.

10. Boeta Chamberlain – 4.5
Missed twice off the tee in the first half, five points that would have cut the deficit to a more manageable 11. A bright moment was an interception at the time his team was enjoying its early seven-minute lead. His 58-minute contribution, though, was summed up by the ineffective clearance kick that was run back for Leinster’s fourth try early in the second half.

9. Grant Williams – 6.5
Produced a world-class score on seven minutes, fastening onto ruck ball, beating Tadhg Furlong around the corner and stylishly cantering clear from the 10-metre to score. That moment of beauty, though, and his generally slick passing service weren’t enough to fire up his sluggish team. Gave the assist for the Sharks’ late consolation that was chalked off for breakdown foul play.

1. Ox Nche – 6
A good man for a tackle when under the pump amid relentless traffic, he can be generally pleased with his hour-long individual effort. However, his concession of a scrum free in the Leinster attack near the interval was annoying as it ruined a promising attacking position to trim the-then 16-point margin.

2. Bongi Mbonambi – 5.5
Early lineout didn’t function as smoothly as the Springboks hooker would have liked in his 60 minutes. Also had his frustrations elsewhere. For instance, in the 28th-minute phase where he latched onto a maul near the Leinster line that failed to go anywhere and when he did loop off and went solo, he was quickly mown down on the carry.

3. Thomas du Toit – 6.5 (Carlu Sadie – 5)
The Bath-bound tighthead won a penalty at the first Leinster scrum against Michael Milne, but he couldn’t prevent the prop from scoring with a 21st-minute carry. Du Toit’s gallant attempt left him requiring shoulder treatment and although he played on for one more period of play, he was hooked three minutes later for Carlu Sadie. The sub had a positive start, winning a scrum penalty, but struggled with his bulk around the park. His failure to take a pass on 46 minutes highlighted this but he did soon win another scrum penalty.

4. Corne Rahl – 5.5
Had it tough as the man wearing Etzebeth’s shoes. An early lineout fumble was an indicator of that onerous challenge for a lock making just his second start at this level, but he went on to play the entire match, an exposure that should greatly assist the rookie’s development.

5. Gerbrandt Grobler – 5.5
The lock had an unsavoury time at Munster some years ago and this return to elsewhere in Ireland won’t be fondly remembered. A ruck carry, which tempted an infringement for a shot at goal that was missed just before the break, was his most evident contribution.

6. James Venter – 6
Very busy on the tackling front but slow off the back of the scrum to shut down the attack for Leinster’s first score. Simple things blotted his copy. An example was the penalty-conceding extra roll he took on the floor near the Leinster line in the first half. Then there was also the late second-half yellow for his needless clearout on Andrew Porter which resulted in a Sharks try getting cancelled.

7. Vincent Tshituka – 6.5
His game ended in the frustration of not having the gas to stop the countering Jamison Gibson-Park from scoring Leinster’s fifth try but the solace was that he was his team’s best back row throughout a lopsided contest they were never going to win.

8. Sikhumbuzo Notshe – 5.5
A regular starter in recent weeks, he came up against the wrecking ball that was Doris whose try cancelled out the early Sharks lead. Was then caught dawdling by the Hugo Keenan break that laid the platform for the third Leinster score. Did what he could during his 58 minutes, but this was an outing where Doris very much eclipsed him.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search