Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sharpshooters: Super Rugby's goal-kicking top-dogs

(Photo / Getty Images)

Although there may be teams that can buck the tend from time to time, it’s a safe claim to suggest that it’s considerably more difficult to win a game of rugby if your kickers aren’t on form.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last weekend, Curwin Bosch kicked seven penalties to earn the Sharks an unlikely draw against the Crusaders. The Crusaders may have outscored the Sharks three tries to zero, but Bosch’s accurate kicking kept the Sharks in the game.

Contrast that to the first round of the season where the Chiefs lined up against the Highlanders with no recognised goal-kicker on the field. Between Brad Weber and Shaun Stevenson, the Chiefs only succeeded in two of their five attempts on goal while the Highlander’s Josh Ioane was successful in five of his six attempts. The Highlanders came out trumps in that game, 30 – 27, even though the Chiefs outscored the Highlanders four tries to three.

Goal kicking wins matches, there’s no disputing it. So how have Super Rugby’s goal-kickers been performing in 2019?

Hayden Parker, of the Sunwolves, is once again leading the pack. Parker has missed only twice this season – one conversion and one penalty – which lands him a 95% kick accuracy. The average accuracy for the regular goal-kickers sits at about 77% in 2019, which puts Parker way above the norm.

Next in line are the Kiwi pair of Josh Ioane and Damian McKenzie who are both on 86%. The Highlanders obviously won the kicking duel in round one of the season, with Ioane’s accuracy cementing his team the win. McKenzie was notably absent from that match. The young first-five-cum-fullback has a number of strings to his bow, but his under-appreciated goal-kicking could well have been enough on its own to sway the match in the Chiefs favour.

With McKenzie out for the rest of the season due to a ruptured ACL, the goalkicking duties in the Waikato have fallen to his older brother, Marty (who also missed the match against the Highlanders). Marty’s strike-rate of 57% is the lowest of the current first-choice goal-kickers and could prove problematic for the Chiefs moving forward. Coincidentally or not, the Chiefs are also attempting fewer penalty shots at goals now that the younger McKenzie is out, suggesting that a less favourable game-plan has had to be adopted.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Red’s Bryce Hegarty is the most accurate goal-kicker in Australia at present with an 85% return rate. Hegarty was scarcely used by the Waratahs in 2018, prompting the transfer to Queensland. This relocation has evidently done Hegarty a world of good and has given him the opportunity for regular game time.

Hegarty’s fellow Australians aren’t performing particularly well on the goal-kicking front this season. Both Incumbent Wallaby first-five Bernard Foley and the man many hope will take that berth, Quade Cooper, are sitting on 75%.

Foley has been known to have bad days off the tee – usually at the least opportune times for Waratahs and Wallabies fans – while Quade Cooper is more known for his creativity on the field than his goal-kicking precision. Less than amazing accuracy in the past has never hampered either player’s selection at the top level and probably won’t have an impact in 2019 either.

South Africa has the fifth and sixth best goal-kickers in 2019’s edition of Super Rugby, in the forms of Handre Pollard and Curwin Bosch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pollard’s 82% accuracy has played a significant role in the Bulls’ successes this season, with the Pretorians always comfortable taking any penalty opportunities on offer. With 39 shots to his name, Pollard has attempted more than twice as many penalties as any player in the competition. He is easily the top points scorer this season, sitting on 136. Parker is next best and he’s yet to crack the 100-mark.

Bosch’s usefulness has already been documented, but it’s interesting to note that he was not used as a regular goal-kicker at all last year, only attempting eight shots at goal. Instead, Robert du Preez was the first-choice for the Sharks and he’s only hitting the ball over at a 71% accuracy in 2019.

The Jaguares have utilised both Domingo Miotti and Joaquín Díaz Bonilla at 10 this season since regular first-five Nicolas Sanchez departed at the end of 2018. The younger Miotti has wrestled the jersey off Díaz Bonilla in recent weeks and is kicking at just under 80% – though Díaz Bonilla’s 75% accuracy is not terrible either.

The Crusaders, who are comfortably top of the table, are the one team who have performed to a consistently high standard in all facets of the game except one: goal-kicking. Although it is so often the downfall for a team, goal-kicking has not hindered the Crusader’s march towards Super Rugby supremacy.

Playmaker Richie Mo’unga, who many believe deserves to be starting at first-five for the All Blacks, is the main culprit for the Crusaders’ poor kicking performance. His 69% accuracy is well below what should be expected for a Super Rugby player – let alone an international 10. Last year’s 78% was a considerably better return for the young Cantabrian but is still a little below what you would hope for from your primary goal-kicker.

As a whole, the current crop of goal-kickers are performing slightly worse in 2019 compared to previous years. This season’s kickers who were also operating last year are hitting at 77% this season compared to 81% last year. This difference may be small, but in a competition as close as what’s being served up in 2019, small numbers can make all the difference.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search