Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Shaun Edwards' 'sense of injustice' about French World Cup exit

Shaun Edwards at work with France (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

Shaun Edwards has revisited his frustration at seeing France knocked out at the quarter-final stage of their own Rugby World Cup. The French were hotly tipped as a favourite to win the tournament, but they were eliminated by eventual winners South Africa following a classic last-eight encounter that finished 29-28 for the Springboks in Paris.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just over 12 weeks on from that agonising October 15 defeat, Fabien Galthie and co are laying the groundwork for their upcoming Guinness Six Nations which commences with a February 2 meeting with Grand Slam champions Ireland in Marseille.

Squads for this tournament are set to named in the coming weeks ahead of the tournament’s January 22 media day in Dublin.

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber on evolution and why he left international rugby

Former Springbok coach Jacques Nienaber has given his first Leinster press conference and at it spoke about how big a role family played in his decision to leave Test rugby. He also spoke about evolution and how it will take a while to get things right at Leinster.

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber on evolution and why he left international rugby

Former Springbok coach Jacques Nienaber has given his first Leinster press conference and at it spoke about how big a role family played in his decision to leave Test rugby. He also spoke about evolution and how it will take a while to get things right at Leinster.

In the meantime, Edwards has reflected on France’s World Cup near-miss, outlining in the latest edition of the monthly Rugby World magazine his sense of injustice that his team were only quarter-finalists but also an acceptance that he wouldn’t change a thing about their preparations for France 2023.

“Sometimes you get a sense of injustice,” he admitted ahead of a Six Nations campaign that will conclude for the French with a March 16 home game in Lyon versus England, the World Cup’s best-placed European team as they finished third thanks to their bronze final win over Argentina in Paris.

“I thought we played some magnificent rugby, both in attack and defence throughout the competition. But South Africa, fair play to them, they found a way to win the game, which is not unusual for them.

“They continued in that vein, winning every game by one point. Due credit to South Africa. But we’re obviously aggrieved in some certain ways. It’s probably one of… a very, very difficult loss for us and for me.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our attackers caused a lot of problems for the defence. They posed a lot of problems for our defence with a different tactic, the up-and-under. There are many different ways to score tries in rugby and you only get the same points.”

Asked what would he change about the French World Cup preparations, Edwards added: “Nothing, I thought everything we did was aligned to winning. We beat New Zealand in the first game and I thought our performance against Italy was outstanding. You have to remember we only beat them by one score the last time we played them. I thought the real France turned up on the night.

“I don’t think we could have done anything more. The fitness in Monaco (at a pre-tournament camp) was a very high standard. The guys trained extremely hard and were in great shape. That was proven in the first game against New Zealand.

“It was played in unbelievable heat. It’s one of the hottest games I have ever been involved in. I’ve played in Papua New Guinea, in North Queensland, and that was boiling. So I don’t think I there is much more we could have done.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fair play to South Africa. In rugby, you get knocked down and you’ve got to get back up off the floor, shake your opponent’s hand and wish them luck. That’s what you have got to do.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
T
Turlough 345 days ago

Agree that France made costly selection error including playing Dupont in the second half against Namibia. South Africa needed a high try turnover off the new cross field up and under tactic and they got 2 tries out of 3 from that including Arendse’s pushing Fickou into two other French players for the first. A sub-par Dupont coughed up a try and a penalty.
France couldn’t come back after Etsebet’s try. Ramos kicking straight into touch showed that their habit of pulling games out of the fire could not survive the heat of a quarter final against South Africa. That was the highest standard of rugby that SA played in the knock outs by a mile and it was needed. Great win and the narrow scrape against England left them with just enough to take the cup.
France’s reliance on flair rather than game play and pressure to win tight matches is not up to RWC winning standard. SAs is.

P
Pecos 346 days ago

Using words like “sense of injustice” & “aggreived” is either sour grapes or denial. Either way, get over it. Also referencing beating NZ in a pool game shows a lack of insight. Pools are merely about qualifying for the quarters. Everything else is irrelevant at the knockout stage.

B
Bob 347 days ago

France vs the Boks was the best match of the RWC for me. Peato Mauvaka was a revelation and had an incredible match. MOTM for me.
The Etzebeth try was the nail in the coffin for the French - they could not lift after the try.
Pollard’s kicking in the second half had Bielle-Biarrey scurrying around and he was caught out of position on several occassions.
The injustice Edwards should be aggrieved about is that the Frech picked an inexperienced wing against the best kicking team / flyhalf in the world. That while they had Jaminet & Villiere at their disposal. In the end it was poor team selection that significantly impacted France’s chances of progressing to the semi-finals.

E
Euan 347 days ago

Unfortunately, you didn't teach your team how to clean take the high balls. As simple as that.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 29 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search