Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Shaun Edwards wades in on Freddie Steward's rescinded red

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

French defence coach Shaun Edwards has expressed his bemusement over the decision to send off Freddie Steward in England’s final Six Nations match against Ireland in Dublin.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steward was shown a red card after he collided with Hugo Keenan as the Irish fullback collected a ball from the deck, but his suspension was overturned this week.

The Leicester fullback appeared before a virtual disciplinary hearing on Tuesday night, and it was decided that while the tackle was an act of foul play, there were sufficient mitigating circumstances to view it as a yellow card offence only. This means that Steward can play in Leicester’s next game.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

England’s frustration at the on-field decision by referee Jaco Peyper was evident, with Owen Farrell’s incredulous “Red card?!” response caught on camera. Despite being down to 14 men, England showed resilience in the face of Steward’s dismissal, but ultimately lost 29-16.

Writing in his Daily Mail column, Edwards, who previously coached Wales’ defence, said the decision was “an injustice”.

Related

“Freddie Steward’s red card on Saturday night – which was rescinded on Wednesday – was an injustice. It was an injustice to Steward himself and also to the England fans who had paid good money for their tickets. Referees need to be given more control and power to make their own decisions.

“In football, ultimately it comes down to the referee’s discretion if he is pulled over by the VAR for a penalty check. In rugby, it is like a village council meeting!

ADVERTISEMENT

“In my eyes, Steward’s actions barely warranted a penalty. I have no idea what he could have done to avoid contact. The problem we have is refereeing has become a box-ticking exercise. We have some brilliant referees but they don’t seem to have any discretion because the game is basically officiated by World Rugby checklists.”

The hearing noted in its statement that “match officials are required to make decisions under pressure and in the heat of a live match environment,” suggesting that they understood the difficulties faced by referees.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
D
David 642 days ago

We have some brilliant referees but they don’t seem to have any discretion because the game is basically officiated by World Rugby checklists.” - This just isn't true. The head protocol provides plenty of room for referee discretion (including whether it's foul play at all and whether there are mitigating factors). Referees just need to use that discretion wisely. Peyper & Co didn't.

B
Bernard 642 days ago

That was a Red card all the way, in the first match when Wayne Barnes didn’t send off a player for a similar tackle I thought he should have been banned from officiating for being so stupid! Thank God for Refs the calibre of Mr Peyper

E
Euan 642 days ago

Rescinding was the injustice.

J
John 643 days ago

And I suppose Antonio's hit on Herring shouldn't have been a penalty. Obviously worried about playing Ireland

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 7 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025? What should be on a rugby Christmas wish list for 2025?
Search