Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Shocker': Confusion among fans as Jordie Barrett's conversion controversially ruled out

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

Fans have taken to social media to express their confusion at a controversial call by the assistant referees that denied Jordie Barrett a conversion that appeared to be successful.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett was attempting to convert Asafo Aumua’s second try that brought the Hurricanes to within five points of the Blues with just over 15 minutes to play.

Lining the kick up from the left-hand touchline, Barrett nudged the ball towards the right-hand post before it seemingly curled back in through the uprights.

Video Spacer

Highlanders vs Crusaders | Super Rugby Aotearoa | Round One

Video Spacer

Highlanders vs Crusaders | Super Rugby Aotearoa | Round One

However, neither of the assistant referees, Mike Fraser and James Doleman, nor referee Paul Williams or TMO Brendon Pickerill picked up on the oversight, much to the dismay of Barrett, the commentators and the crowd at Wellington’s Sky Stadium.

Numerous fans have taken to Twitter to express their outrage at the decision, with some describing it as “shocking” and “disgusting”.

One fans joked that it “seems appropriate the touch judges are sponsored by spec savers”, while others argued the officials got it right as the ball sailed over the top of the upright, which they believed meant it would have hit the post if it was lower.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another Twitter user wondered if Hurricanes skipper Ardie Savea could have used his captain’s call on the decision.

Respected rugby journalist and broadcaster Nigel Yalden, meanwhile, said the conversion should be awarded after the fact as the resulting play – a re-start back at halfway – is the same regardless of whether the conversion is successful or not.

In the end, though, the conversion wouldn’t have made a difference, as the Blues ended up running out 31-16 winners after Rieko Ioane and Otere Black combined to score 10 points in the final five minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett was thrust into the limelight earlier in the match after he landed two monstrous penalty goals from near halfway to give the Hurricanes an 11-7 lead at half-time.

However, the Wellington franchise find themselves at the bottom of the standings, trailing the fourth-placed Highlanders on points difference.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cape Town | Leg 1 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 2 hours ago
Late try spares Ireland from further ignominy in world rankings

I wouldn’t rely on that alone.

Top 6 will get you a 1#ranking draw.

That’s fine. The draw for the 1/8; 1/4; 1/2 finals can then be worked out two ways.


So you will have 6 winners, 6 runners up, and 4 best third place to be in the 1/8 finals,

The soccer World Cup way is to base this solely on what happens in the Pools. So best 4 Pool winners will play best 4 third place and assuming the top 4 pool winners progress, they will avoid eachother until the semi. The problems with this is that Big teams will be encouraged to absolutely trash minnows raking up huge scores. Also, another one. Lets use the top 4 now. What if Australia and England don’t make the top 6 and they end up in Pools say with New Zealand and South Africa.

Lets assume they win their group but hard match means they finish 5th and 6th best pool winners. That could be an eventual quarter final line up of Top4s France-South Africa and NZ-Ireland or similar. Will they risk that again?


The way that rugby has done it so far is that they have generally made the draw to the final in advance. This is hugely advantageous including for fans. For example you could have the Boks based in Perth etc.

How do they manage this? They reward the top 4 ranked nations as the teams that will play the best 4 third places. Thats the only way. You base the quarters and semis on this also. That way you are guaranteed that the top4 are apart until the SF (contentious last time). Fans/TV stations. journos etc. cities can all plan etc.


It might be the soccer way but I wouldnt trust WR. The scheduling will as usual be completely opaque. But Top 6 needed, and top4 to hedge bets.

10 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Crusaders vs Reds takes: Australia's version of Retallick, All Black bolter emerges Crusaders vs Reds takes: Australia's Retallick
Search