Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Shots fired: Steve Hansen's hypocritical beef with Pat Lam

Will Steve Hansen make the call to stay on after the World Cup?

The All Blacks coach has taken a swipe at “ex-New Zealander” Pat Lam over Bristol’s signing of Steven Luatua – but he’s being a bit of a hypocrite, writes Jamie Wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steven Luatua seems like a pretty quiet guy, but his departure from New Zealand rugby has been making some noise – though none of it has come from him.

It was announced this week that the loose forward is heading to Bristol, the recently-promoted Aviva Premiership side coached by Pat Lam. He takes with him a massive amount of talent, which most Kiwi pundits would feel like he never really showed the full potential of during his 15 tests for the All Blacks.

Luatua’s departure is part of a somewhat worrying trend of All Blacks heading offshore with more than a few miles left on their odometers as far as services to New Zealand rugby is concerned.

One of the main reasons for him signing with bottom-of-the-table Bristol was the influence of his former coach at the Blues Pat Lam. Here’s what All Blacks coach Steve Hansen had to say about that:

He spoke briefly to the contracts team, and he’s been tapped on the shoulder by Pat Lam which is disappointing too. If you’re an ex-New Zealander you should be a bit mindful about players’ careers.

That’s the same Pat Lam who was the Blues best coach (record-wise) in the last decade. The same Pat Lam who the Blues fired and virtually sent into exile. And the same Pat Lam who has since guided Connacht from the ‘other guys’ in Irish rugby to a Pro12 title.

ADVERTISEMENT

Oh, and the same Pat Lam who was sent a racist text message from a former Auckland coach in the final days of his coaching tenure at the Blues.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1485479950″]

So the coach of the All Blacks calling a guy who was born and raised in Auckland, played for the Crusaders and one tour match for the All Blacks, and then had to put up with Mark Anscombe texting him an “ex-New Zealander” is… kind of stupid.

Hansen gets a pretty sweet ride from the New Zealand rugby media, mainly because he doesn’t really say much. When he does, it’s in such a laconic, Kiwi-bloke-who-reminds-us-of-the-good-old-days way that we can all have a laugh about it and not realise it’s more or less a stream of non-information.

But this time ‘Shag’ is being a grade-A hypocrite.

Suggesting Lam is trying to damage New Zealand rugby is a bit rich coming from someone who used to coach Wales. Especially since Wales in the pro era have always been quite reliant on convincing players born elsewhere to come and suddenly discover their Welsh heritage (including, most ironically, Mark Anscombe’s son).

ADVERTISEMENT

For his part, Lam has responded strongly, saying:

I believe many New Zealanders would also be offended to be labelled an ‘ex-New Zealander’ by the All Black coach … he has great influence because of his position of privilege and responsibility in representing New Zealand worldwide. Who determines and judges who is a New Zealander and who isn’t? I don’t believe that has ever been the role of the All Black head coach.

You don’t need a magnifying glass to read the serious beef lingering between those lines.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search