Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sir Steve Hansen on Super Rugby's issues: South Africa, ego and U21 talent

Lions flanker Kwagga Smith in action in 2018's Super Rugby final. (Photo by Martin Hunter / Getty Images )

The Wallabies and All Blacks have both suffered historic losses at the Rugby World Cup, fueling criticism over the state of Super Rugby and its ability to develop and ready players for the international level.

ADVERTISEMENT

Legendary All Blacks coach Sir Steve Hansen has thrown his experienced two cents to the mix, highlighting the loss of South African teams from the competition, Australia’s stance on dropping to four teams and the lack of U21 competition as key areas to address as soon as possible.

The 2015 World Cup winning coach told The Platform “there’s a few issues going on in southern hemisphere rugby” and pointed to the success of the northern hemisphere, and how the European teams are developing their young talent as a reference for what needs to change.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Also highlighted were the successful Super Rugby models of the past, and while a return to those models signals big change, they’re changes that Hansen believes would benefit the competitiveness of the southern hemisphere nations moving forward.

“A maximum of four (Australian teams) would make it better and that’s when Australian rugby was really strong,” he said. “They had three sides that were really competitive every weekend in Super Rugby. It was forcing us to get better ourselves.

“We are missing having South Africa in there, that style of game and maybe bringing back the Argentinians, finding a way to get them back into the competition will be good too.”

Related

In recent decades Super Rugby has provided the platform for players to develop into international stars, Hansen says “there’s no reason” why the competition can’t replicate that success in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But I think we’d all agree, at the moment it’s not the competition we need it to be and we have to find a willingness to work together within the country and across the countries to come up with some solutions. That’s been the stumbling block so far.

“There’s one or two things that get in the way; one is our ego of not wanting to give up a team. We saw Australia try to do that and the Western Force dug their toes in and they had nowhere to go.

“So internally, at some point, we have to say to ourselves ‘this is what’s best for our game’ and when you’re hearing the likes of (Stephen) Hoiles, the ex-Wallaby player, coming and saying the same thing then you know that that’s the obvious thing to do.

“But we have to break down the barriers that are stopping us from doing that and within Australian sport, their biggest problem is state vs state, no one wants to give an inch and if we’re not prepared to give an inch then we’re going to lose a mile at the top end.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Look, I’m not saying for Eddie (Jones) and the players, there’s no fault of theirs in this World Cup. They’ll reflect on it and say yes, we could have done some things better.

“But Rugby Australia has a problem because it’s not producing players or coaches that can play and coach at that level, not enough of them to create competition. So, they have to do something different and they have to be prepared to challenge themselves around that. As do we.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

4
Wins
3
1
Streak
1
20
Tries Scored
15
74
Points Difference
3
3/5
First Try
2/5
0/5
First Points
4/5
4/5
Race To 10 Points
2/5

“Now that we don’t have South Africa playing, how do we find that competition? What are we doing with our under-21s and how do we get them more games and start making that team more important because one of the things the Northern Hemisphere have done, they’ve done really well in developing their under-21 players.

‘They’re winning World Cups and so forth, they play a Six Nations, they’re mirroring what they do at a higher level so that’s giving young guys a whole lot of experience. Our guys aren’t getting that and I know that New Zealand Rugby’s looking at certain things they want to do but we just need to get on with it.

“But all this costs money and that’s another big stumbling block. Australia don’t have any and we don’t have an awesome amount of it either but we’ve got to prioritise what’s really, really going to get to that level that we need to be at to be number one.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
S
Silk 449 days ago

What has changed since the 2019 WC?
South Africa were "forced" out of Super Rugby and joined the URC. NZ and Australian scribes laughed at this.
Be honest and admit that Australian rugby has gone seriously South. Are the All Blacks of 2023 better than the All Blacks of 2019?
No.
Is the Boks of 2023 better than the Boks if 2019? Yes.
Since our franchise teams joined the URC, the skill level and quality of South African players have improved dramatically.
That has rolled over to the Bok team.
I agree with Hansen about u/21 rugby.
In South Africa we have the Varsity Cup with about 15 universities competing. The quality of rugby is superb. Those youngsters then progress to senior rugby.
To me as an outsider the biggest problem with NZ rugby is arrogance.
You shall reap what you sow....

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search