Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sir Steve Hansen sheds light on how he used to pick All Blacks squads

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Sir Steve Hansen has opened up on how he and his colleagues selected All Blacks squads during his time at the helm of the New Zealand national side.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regarded as one of the greatest coaches of all-time, Hansen was part of the All Blacks set-up as an assistant coach from 2004 to 2011 before succeeding Sir Graham Henry as head coach from 2012 to 2019.

During his time on New Zealand’s coaching staff, Hansen won back-to-back World Cup titles in 2011 and 2015 and enjoyed an unprecedented 92.6 percent win rate from 68 test matches between 2012 and 2016.

Video Spacer

Was Roger Tuivasa-Sheck’s Blues debut the greatest cross-code debut of all-time? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Was Roger Tuivasa-Sheck’s Blues debut the greatest cross-code debut of all-time? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

As such, Hansen was crowned World Rugby Coach of the Year four times, the second-most successful recipient of that award behind five-time winner Henry, cementing his status as one of the greatest coaches in the history of the game.

Much of Hansen’s success with the All Blacks can be attributed to his selection of players, many of whom he handed international debuts to and went on to become the best in the world in their respective positions.

Those players include Conrad Smith, Jerome Kaino, Kieran Read, Owen Franks, Ben Smith, Israel Dagg, Sam Whitelock, Sonny Bill Williams, Brodie Retallick, Julian Savea, Aaron Smith, Sam Cane, Beauden Barrett, Dane Coles, Ardie Savea and Rieko Ioane.

The selection aspect of his coaching role is one that Hansen has now shed some light on in a recent interview in which he detailed the processes that go into how an All Blacks squad is picked.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to the New Zealand Herald, Hansen outlined that “80 percent of the [coaching] job is done if you’ve picked the right players”, and stipulated that “95 percent of New Zealanders who follow rugby could pick 95 percent of the [All Blacks] team.”

According to the 62-year-old, it is the remaining five percent of the All Blacks squad that requires due consideration and debate among the selectors, a process that he said “could take a couple of days, even a couple of weeks.”

“You pick yours, I’ll pick mine. It’s only a paper team,” Hansen told the New Zealand Herald of the method he and his fellow selectors used to pick All Blacks squads.

“When the nitty gritty comes, what we used to do was write your own team up, and all the players we agree on, they’re in. Where there’s uncertainty, we keep having conversations until there’s no uncertainty.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Unlike the general public, though, Hansen said he and his colleagues had far greater access to wide-ranging and in-depth information about those competing for All Blacks selection.

Related

“We’re totally informed about all the things that we’re looking for,” he told the New Zealand Herald.

“Whether it’s fitness data, skill data, home life, injuries. A lot of players are playing with niggles from injuries. Some are playing with something in the background in their lives that could have an effect on form.”

However, in spite of all the information available to All Blacks selectors, Hansen said there were times that he still picked players based on intuition and faith in their ability rather than recent form and data.

An example of that was his continual selection of Ma’a Nonu, who, as an established All Black, often struggled to perform in Super Rugby, but remained a constant figure in Hansen’s squads despite public opposition to his inclusion in the national set-up.

“Ma’a Nonu was a unique sort of individual who sometimes struggled at Super Rugby, but he certainly never struggled at test rugby,” Hansen said.

“The pundits who said, ‘You can’t pick Ma’a Nonu, he’s playing poorly,’ they weren’t taking into account that we had all the confidence in the world that when it comes to test rugby, he would get it right.

“So, when you’re getting down to the final call you’ve got guys who you know have the mental fortitude and the skill level to play at that level, because they’ve proved it.

“Whereas a guy that hasn’t been in that arena, you have to look into the future. You want to know what his mental fortitude is like, and you’re watching later in the Super competition when the pressure’s on whether he’s coping okay.”

Hansen’s comments come days after New Zealand Rugby [NZR] chief executive Mark Robinson confirmed Hansen’s former assistant Ian Foster will retain his place as All Blacks head coach following a “rigorous and robust” end-of-season review.

Foster’s reign at the helm of the All Blacks has been heavily scrutinised since he took over from Hansen as head coach of the New Zealand national side.

A shortened 2020 campaign ended with a win rate of just 50 percent and included a first-ever loss to Argentina, while last year’s extended season saw the All Blacks fall to defeats against the Springboks, Ireland and France.

Those three losses were the most the All Blacks since suffered in one year since 2009, but, speaking at a press conference on Thursday, Robinson said NZR were happy with Foster’s efforts.

“There had been a full look at all aspects of the campaign last year and in all aspects we’re very comfortable with Ian’s performance through that time and the level of work he’s undertaking at the moment. There’s strong support there.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search