Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Six Nations statement: Why the Owen Farrell red card was rescinded

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The Six Nations have issued a statement explaining the decision by an independent disciplinary hearing to free the red-carded Owen Farrell to play again with immediate effect. There were grave fears that the England skipper could be banned for up to six matches following last Saturday’s incident with Wales’ Taine Basham at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

Farrell was initially given a yellow card but was soon told while sitting in the sin bin that the sanction was being upgraded to a red card following review by the TMO bunker.

However, rather than England having to deal with their captain being unavailable for the start of their Rugby World Cup campaign on September 9 versus Argentina in Marseille, he has instead been cleared to play and is available for selection for this Saturday’s Summer Nations Series game away to Ireland in Dublin.

Video Spacer

Kiwi pundits react to Owen Farrell’s red | The Breakdown

Video Spacer

Kiwi pundits react to Owen Farrell’s red | The Breakdown

A statement following the three-and-a-half hour judicial hearing read: “England fly-half Owen Farrell appeared before an independent judicial committee via video link having received a red card for an act of foul play contrary to law 9.13 (a player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously; dangerous tackling includes, but is not limited to, tackling or attempting to tackle an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders) in the Summer Nations Series match between England and Wales on Saturday, August 12.

“The independent judicial committee consisting of Adam Casselden (SC, chair), John Langford and David Croft (all from Australia) heard the case, considering all the available evidence and submissions from the player and his representative. The player acknowledged that whilst he had committed an act of foul play, he denied that the act was worthy of a red card.

Related

“After reviewing all the evidence, questioning the player in detail and hearing submissions from the player’s representative, the committee concluded that the foul play review officer was wrong on the balance of probabilities to upgrade the yellow card issued to the player to a red card.

“The committee determined, when applying World Rugby’s head contact process, that mitigation should be applied to the high degree of danger found by the foul play review officer. The committee found that a late change in dynamics due to England No2’s interaction [Jamie George] in the contact area brought about a sudden and significant change in direction from the ball carrier.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In the committee’s opinion, this mitigation was sufficient to bring the player’s act of foul play below the red card threshold. The committee believes it is important to record that no criticism is made of the foul play review officer nor would any be warranted.

“Unlike the foul play review officer, the committee had the luxury of time to deliberate and consider, in private, the incident and the proper application of the head contact process.

“The committee believes this is in contrast to the foul play review officer, who was required to make his decision in a matter of minutes without the benefit of all the additional material including hearing from the player and his legal representative.

“On that basis, the committee did not uphold the red card and the player is free to play again immediately.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

61 Comments
I
Isikeli 458 days ago

Well if you going to bring a KC can the minor nations use him too paid for by World Rugby? I say get rid of this red card fiasco and introduce a reporting regime post game and penalty of course.

E
Euan 458 days ago

It was the right decision, as he was merely defending himself from a sudden direction change. Red card was ridiculous.

G
Gee 458 days ago

Corruption. Need to get the leader of the corrupt pack to front up to the rugby public and explain how this was rescinded and he has 0 match bans. He keeps doing it and getting away with it. I guarantee in the world cup you will see a shoulder charge not as bad as Farrell's and the player involved will have a multiple match ban. Do yourself a favour and watch the Farrell's shoulder tackle against the Bok Andre Esterhuizen. I've never seen anything that bad in 20 years. Went unpunished. I hope someone puts that bastard in a wheelchair.

V
Viliami 458 days ago

And Tongas star centre George Moala gets 20 weeks suspension for his red card in Tongas match against Canada over the weekend. Totally Unbelievable!!

S
Steffen 459 days ago

Absolutely ridiculous and a demonstration of selective interpretation of the Law and subsequent decision making. 😡

T
TQ 459 days ago

The decision isn’t absurd. If there is mitigation, which there is here because of the change in direction, the foul play may be downgraded to a yellow card. What everything turns on is whether or not the mitigation is sufficient - which is an entirely subjective call. But for the change in direction, Farrell wouldn’t have hit is head - so was not unreasonable to make the call they did.
The three JOs on the panel are much more experienced and in a better placed to make that subjective call than anyone here / than the mob. The problem is the judicial framework, which WR try all the time to make more of a consistent and legally robust process, but which leads to more decisions like this that offend against rugby common sense!

B
Bernard 459 days ago

The panel must be the only people on the planet who thought that George's "push" on Basham was sufficient mitigation for their decision.

J
John 459 days ago

It's beyond outrageous this thug has a history of trying to seriously injure opposition players and his record shows this this is a decision that was bought and paid for it's that simple their is no other reason for such a blatantly crass decision as this. It's idiots like this panel who are destroying our game there is absolutely no excuse for this and there is no mitigation what so ever other than to ensure this thug can play in the world cup. This has destroyed any faith that fans of this game have in its ruling body they should be all sacked.

R
Robert 459 days ago

so world rugby set the standard for this RWC.
so each and every red card dished out has to be treated as per Farrel saga - this has opened a can of WTF if you asked me...sad and disappointing...

g
giorgi 459 days ago

Oh, yes- "England No2’s interaction". Well further it will be the rain, the snow, a muddy pitch, a bird even a mosquito affecting dynamics.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
France outwrestle All Blacks in titanic Test for one-point win

Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.


Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.


Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).


It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!


On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.

61 Go to comments
T
Tom 1 hour ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Interesting post. I realise that try was down to Marcus Smith not Slade, this is why I mentioned that England's attack is completely reliant on Smith working miracles. Just wanted to highlight that Slade's little touch was classy and most English players would have cocked it up. Earl has gas, he's very athletic but Underhill is nailed on at 7 in my eyes though. They both need to be on the pitch so we need a tall 6 or 8 to complement them which we have in CCS and potentially Ollie Chessum. We also have young Henry Pollock who may be the 7 by the world cup.


The whole attack needs an overhaul but Richard Wigglesworth our attack coach was a very limited scrum half who excelled at box kicking and had no running game. Spent most of his career with Saracens who mauled, defended and set pieced their way to victory.... Which might have been ok if Felix Jones hadn't quit and been replaced by a guy who coaches Oyonnax who have one of the worst defences in the French 2nd division. I'm not too emotionally invested in England right now because this coaching setup isn't capable of winning anything.


England had no attack when they were winning under Eddie either. They battered teams with huge dominant tackles and won from pressure. The last time England had any creativity in attack was the Stuart Lancaster/Mike Catt era. They played some fantastic attacking rugby but results were mediocre, lots of 2nd place finishes in the 6N although it felt like we were building something special until we got brutally dumped out of our home world cup in the pool stage.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

8 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Rassie Erasmus pinpoints what made the difference in tight Bok win Rassie Erasmus pinpoints what made the difference in tight Bok win
Search