Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The 'obvious choice' to oversee Eddie Jones as England DoR

England Head Coach, Eddie Jones looks on during the Guinness Six Nations match between Scotland and England at BT Murrayfield Stadium (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Former England utility back Austin Healey is demanding change at the top within the England setup as yet another Guinness Six Nations campaign looks to have passed Eddie Jones’ side by.

ADVERTISEMENT

If England lose to France tomorrow, as many people predict they will, they could once again finish in fifth on the table. Within English rugby, such a placing would be viewed as an unacceptable scenario, not least given the union’s financial clout.

Healey- aka The Leicester Lip – has had enough after two lacklustre years under Jones and believes some form of significant change must come.

Video Spacer

Jamie Noon previews the final round of the Six Nations | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 25

Video Spacer

Jamie Noon previews the final round of the Six Nations | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 25

“The last two years have not been anywhere near good enough. If England lose on Saturday, something has to change,” wrote Healey in his Telegraph column.

“One of the major problems is that Jones is always coming up with good excuses. There has always been a complaint, a theme, a change of staff.

“I cannot see Eddie working for anyone else. So, if you said you wanted to put someone above him in a director of rugby role, he would pull the plug himself. Even though in that scenario you could have someone there to control selection, the media and enable Eddie just to coach – and he is undoubtedly a good coach, as we have seen many times.”

Both British & Irish Lions boss Warren Gatland and current Springboks Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus have been linked with the role in recent months, but Healey has tipped former England head coach Stuart Lancaster as “the obvious person” for such a role, despite his disastrous 2015 Rugby World Cup campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Then you might be in a better position. The names that come to mind are Stuart Lancaster, Mark McCall or Rob Baxter – although I could never see Baxter leaving Exeter. Does Warren Gatland want the job? Could you tempt him back from the Chiefs in New Zealand to come and take over before the All Blacks consider appointing him in 2023?

“Nobody else in World Rugby has the financial might of England. That can be a factor.”

“What is clear is that there needs to be some change. Whether that’s personnel, or Jones changing himself.

“He has to be more amenable. He has been very defensive with the media, almost to the extent where nobody else’s opinion matters but his. ‘I don’t read the papers – oh by the way, don’t say that about me.’ Either you read them, or you don’t.

“Put some fun back into the job. Every press conference there is a dig at something, or a wry smile. It’s time for the excuses to end and for someone else to start a new journey – win, lose, or draw against France.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That French side are just too good and England are just not good enough. Which leaves Eddie’s job in a perilous position. Either he changes – again! – or his job is changed.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
p
peter 1008 days ago

Anybody but Rassie please Suggest Lancaster Sure to allow NZ and Boks a crack at WWcup 4

s
second 1008 days ago

There’s another common theme and that is that wherever Shaun Edwards goes success follows

t
tom 1009 days ago

Not one to just agree, however, Healey is right there does always seem to be a theme ............. the common denominator is one person in all of this. Not sure who the right person is, if we want attack maybe Wayne Smith? However, cant see him leaving his role in Japan.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search