Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Six players on Fiji radar yet to make themselves available for Rugby World Cup

Had a move to Ireland and Connacht gone ahead, would we have seen Sevu Reece at the Rugby World Cup with Fiji? (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

It has always been a challenge in the professional era for the Pacific Island nations to make sure all their eligible players are available to them in international windows and it looks as if that could again be an issue for Fiji at the upcoming Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

World Rugby’s bylaws state that all players must be released by domestic clubs for international windows if selected, but that doesn’t protect against the more lucrative contracts which are handed out in return for premature international retirements or players fearing for how secure their future might be if they are regularly away from their club on international duty. With Fiji, Samoa and Tonga not even close to being able to offer, for example, the £22,000 match fees each England players receive per game, international careers do not offer their players the same kind of financial security.

Fiji head coach John McKee recently announced an extended 50-man training squad for the Pacific Nations Cup, with that group set to be cut down to 38 next week.

RugbyPass understands that, had they made themselves available, a further six players would have made that 50-man group, including Crusaders pair Sevu Reece and George Bower.

Chiefs back rower Pita Gus Sowakula and former Fiji U20 prop Alex Hodgman would have also made the cut, as would Japanese-based pair Semisi Masirewa and Junior Waqa.

With New Zealand Super Rugby sides only able to carry two foreign or non-New Zealand-eligible players, any decisions made by players at one of those five franchises to opt to represent Fiji – or Samoa or Tonga – can impact their leverage in future contract negotiations.

Fiji’s preparations for the tournament were also hampered earlier this year by the international retirements of Montpellier pair Nemani Nadolo and Timoci Nagusa, although thankfully for McKee, wing is a position where Fiji are well-stocked to survive their absences.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite that, players who opt to make the move to Europe and take up the bigger money contracts on offer tend to be more readily available, with clubs in general able to carry more ‘foreign’ players and not be dictated to by national eligibility. Of Fiji’s 50-man training squad, 36 are currently based in France, England or Scotland, with only 14 players from the southern hemisphere nations or Japan.

With no inclusion in Super Rugby and their eligible players in New Zealand, Australian and Japan often reluctant to commit their international futures, the Pacific Island nations continue to fight against the odds.

Watch: Fiji move on from their defence coach ahead of the RWC

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search