Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Skivington's Gloucester promise: 'That's not the route we go down'

(Photo by Bob Bradford/CameraSport via Getty Images)

Gloucester boss George Skivington has admitted he won’t be following local rivals Bath and recruiting a raft of new players from crisis-hit Worcester. Ahead of this Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership derby at The Rec, Johann van Grann bolstered his 13th and bottom-placed squad by bringing in Ted Hill, Ollie Lawrence, Fergus Lee-Warner and Valeriy Morozov from the financially ruined Warriors.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Worcester facing a High Court winding-up petition on Wednesday, the expectation is that the club will be liquidated and it will result in the termination of all player contracts, leaving them free agents for other clubs to peruse over.

Gloucester boss Skivington, though, has given support to his existing squad, explaining at his media briefing on Tuesday that his preference would be back the players he already has at Kingsholm rather than potentially hinder their development by recruiting from the Worcester firesale.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“I really like this group we have got and if I keep them all in the building I will,” he said following a start to the season where his team have played just two Premiership matches so far due to a bye week and the cancellation of last weekend’s game with Worcester.

“We all get the chance, we all get to look at the players who are out there and that sort of thing and all the clubs will have the same agents ringing them saying listen, so and so is on offer. But from my point of view I like the squad we have got, I like backing young players like you see with Harry Taylor and Cam Jordan and these lads.

Related

“I think from my point of view, I’m not saying nothing would ever happen if there was a good fit but I am also very keen to develop the young players and invest in the long term. If a player was going to block someone’s development, that is not the route we go down.”

That said, Skivington admitted that the current Gloucester academy set-up isn’t yet as strong as he would like. “We have got Carl Hogg in to run the academy now which is a really positive step and the goal of the club is to have a really good academy feeding into the first team more than going hunting for players, but it takes time to work out where your best identification is.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Ultimately you want an academy where you are two, three players deep in every position, pushing hard to come through, and if one does come through in each position every couple of years you are in a good spot. We’re not quite there with that and our academy probably had a few poor results last season that we are addressing.

“There is some good stuff going on in the background but it is more about making sure we get the system right and then start identifying positions that maybe haven’t just come forward and we have to go and find them.”

The contracting market in England has changed in recent times with renewals and new signings for the following season now being announced much earlier than before. An example was Gloucester last week announcing that Freddie Clarke has extended beyond this season and Skivington reckoned that this earlier announcement of deals will likely become a trend across the Premiership.

“Going forward people can speak to other players earlier than they used to and things like that and the (salary) cap has really squeezed teams now and there are not monster salaries for players anymore and all that sort of stuff,” he explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

“People have to make genuine rugby decisions which if you are happy in a good rugby environment, you feel like you are going to get better and better and the money is fair, I don’t think you would necessarily want to leave. A lot of lads feel like that about where they are and yes, it makes sense in a sort of rugby landscape that is a bit unstable and all the rest of it. You get stability when you can and make strong decisions.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search