Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Some may say I turned my back to Fiji, but it isn't the full story... I wanted to give our local players a chance'

Taqele Naiyaravoro has taken to social media to explain his thoughts on his Test rugby status (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Former Wallaby Taqele Naiyaravoro has made it clear his international future is with Fiji despite being unable to join their sevens squad for the final two legs of the HSBC World Rugby Sevens Series in London and Paris.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fijian 15s coach John McKee put forward the idea of adding Naiyaravoro to the sevens squad to try and get the Fijian-born Northampton winger qualified for the World Cup squad in Japan, but this will not be happening.

Gareth Baber, the Fiji sevens coach, said it wouldn’t be possible to parachute the try-scoring back into a squad that is just three points behind series leaders USA.

In a bid to explain why he opted to play for Australia, where he won two caps, and now wants to represent Fiji, Naiyaravoro took to Facebook and told fans: “It’s mere impossible for me to make the cut for sevens at this stage. Yes, like some of you said, it’s too late and the sevens team has to win the title. A lot is riding on the last two tournaments, so for that I believe God’s timing is the best timing.

“For representing the Wallabies I don’t regret it. Honestly, because as a teenager I’ve always had a dream of playing for Fiji. Never have I thought that I would get interest from the Wallabies. It was a dream I never had. So I pursued it and I’m glad that I have actually got to be part of that team.

“Yes, some may say that I turned my back to Fiji, but it isn’t the full story because my first thought to not play for Fiji was because I wanted to give our local players a chance. And it wasn’t easy – it hurt me in a way because there is no other feeling like representing your country of birth.

ADVERTISEMENT

“My intentions for representing Fiji never died and three years ago I made that decision to play for Fiji, so please don’t think it’s a last minute thing because I had to follow the World Rugby rule of a three-year stand down from international games in order to be able to even be eligible for Fiji.

“This whole process wasn’t built overnight. I’m not seeking for approval from any of you. I’m just making it clear that decision in the past I have made was for a reason and the last thing I wanted was to be labelled as someone who turned their back on their country or chased the money.

“Money can’t buy happiness nor replace that feeling of donning the Fiji jersey. Yes, I understand that there is so much quality players already in the Flying Fijians, but it would be an honour to be able to share the field with them.”

WATCH: Part five of The Academy, the RugbyPass documentary on the Leicester Tigers

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search