Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South Africa concede their first ever World Cup final try

Beauden Barrett of New Zealand scores his team's first try during the Rugby World Cup Final match between New Zealand and South Africa at Stade de France on October 28, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

After 320 minutes across over three-and-a-half matches of action, South Africa have conceded their first ever World Cup final try.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks tried in 1995 and failed even with extra time, then England had two bites of the cherry in 2007 and 2019 and came up short both times. It has taken four matches for a side to finally cross the Springboks’ whitewash in a final, with the All Blacks’ fullback Beauden Barrett doing the honours at the Stade de France.

Even then the All Blacks made hard work of scoring the try, and barely came close to breaching the Boks’ defence throughout the entirety of the first-half as the reigning champions came out the blocks flying with the energy and aggression that they lacked the week before against England.

Video Spacer

Tendai Mtawarira previews the Springbok versus All Blacks World Cup Final

Video Spacer

Tendai Mtawarira previews the Springbok versus All Blacks World Cup Final

Barrett was in support to collect an offload from winger Mark Telea to dot down in the corner on 58 minutes following a period of sustained pressure on South Africa’s line for what was the first try of the match following an hour of penalties. The try made the score 12-11 to South Africa after Richie Mo’unga failed to convert the try.

The All Blacks thought they had scored their first try a few minutes before when Aaron Smith was on the end of a Mo’unga break, but the try was ruled out for a knock on at a maul beforehand.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

20 Comments
H
Hein 388 days ago

let’s be honest… Who was the best team on the day…? Probable the AB’s… But did they close it out? No. Did they make poor on-field decisions? Yes. Did anybody look at their respective stats…? SA played 17 tests in the last year winning 13. NZ played 16 winning 13. The penalty count was 5 to 10 in favour of the AB’s, but SA kicked 4/5 for posts and the AB’s only 3/10. Take the points on hand, guys. SA carried the ball 83 times. Savea and Telea carried the ball more that 30 times, just between the 2 of them. With Telea notching up 9 solid line breaks. The AB’s had the ball 50% or 23mins24secs more than SA. But did they use it profitably? No. Even territory, the AB’s dominated at 53%. But did they convert territory into points? No. But then “Why not?”… SA defended their own like crazy. SA made 209 tackles in 80mins against NZ’s 93… All these stats show that NZ should have won. But didn’t… Why not, you ask… Poor decision making on-field. Take the points on hand, guys. Kick at goal, guys. O, yes. Just a final comment. SA’s fourth penalty (and last kickable penalty) was in the 34th minute, following Cane’s yellow. SA defended that 12-6 lead for the next 46 minutes. During those 46 minutes, they were handed 2 yellow cards and penalized 6 times. Only, after 72mins, did Savea decided to go for posts again, following 5 preceding kickable penalties. You all cry about Cane’s yellow/red card… NZ racked up 5 yellows and 2 reds during the tournament. SA only 3 yellows, of which 2 came in the final. Rugby is a game of chances and SA took theirs. When SA lost to Ireland, we did not blame O’Keefe. We blamed Rassie and Libbok. We blamed our own poor performance. Look at the facts… The top 2 countries in the world have claimed the RWC 70% of the time. And when they face each other there will always be a winner/loser. Let’s keep it real and admit that no other country really has the ability to stop the ‘Boks or the AB’s. Only they can stop the other one.

s
strachan 388 days ago

Boks won by a point, they won the semi by a point, the quarter`s by one point, they just wanted to PROVE ONE POINT, We are the greatest rugby team of all time.

D
David 388 days ago

Did they though? Maybe it was gifted to avoid awarding a penalty try which would have been a straight 7 pointer, but whatever the reasoning the try was not a try. A gift from the ref perhaps but 100% not a valid or legal try. I wonder what the TMO was doing at that point? Busy trying to find a fault somewhere else? Trying to card Siya for a no head contact tackle that is then adjudged to be a head contact tackle…

None of which actually matters. Two sides went to war and one of them walked of the field of battle with a win - go Bokke, and well played ABs.

For us South Africans it is special. We have seen a divisive sport become inclusive and a symbol of apartheid become a symbol of unity.

J
Jon 389 days ago

in other news, South Africa becomes the 1st 4-time champion and the second team to win back-to-back

G
GrahamVF 389 days ago

It’s actually 340 minutes.

J
Jaks 389 days ago

What a non story…

J
James 389 days ago

Off a forward pass to boot! Barnes owed NZ one from 2007 so all square now.

M
Michael Röbbins (academic and writer extraordinair 389 days ago

Wow, just wow.

s
strachan 389 days ago

That is making history 🤣🤣🤣

M
Manie 389 days ago

I have to say congrats to Josh and his boss for publishing this article, capturing the absolute essence of the events that transpired tonight.

Tjom, if this is your key takeaway and what you spend intellectual time on to write and publish, I sincerely hope for your sake that Rugbypass will be there for another 30 years because no one else would pay for the garbage you spit out.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search