Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South Africa player ratings vs Wales | 1st Test July 2022

South Africa's lock Eben Etzebeth gestures during an international rugby union match between South Africa and Wales at Loftus Versfeld in Pretoria on July 2, 2022. (Photo by Christiaan KOTZE / AFP) (Photo by CHRISTIAAN KOTZE/AFP via Getty Images)

Damian Willemse slotted a penalty to secure a fortuitous 32-29 win for South Africa over Wales at Loftus Versfeld on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, it was the famous BOMB SQUAD that saved the Springboks their blushes and prevented the Welsh from getting the first-ever win on South African soil.

Trailing 3-18 at the half-time break, the Boks made good use of their replacement bench – scoring four second-half tries to salvage a win in the opening match of the three-Test series.

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber on Damian Willemse

Video Spacer

Jacques Nienaber on Damian Willemse

Jan de Koning rates the South African players!

15 Damian Willemse – 6
Chased out of line and got it wrong in the opening try for Wales. Made plenty of carries, for 128 metres, but was at times too selfish and too often ran up a blind ally. His options were better than Jantjies when coming in at first-receiver and took over goal-kicking in the second half, with mixed results. Kept his nerve to slot the match-winning kick.

14 Cheslin Kolbe – 7
Some great kick-chasing and tackles. Then showed his attacking skill in the second half and scored a crucial try in a match of limited opportunities. The pocket rocket is back!

13 Lukhanyo Am – 6
Great penalty turnover early in second half and more effective on attack after the break – with some great metres gained. Conceded a couple of turnovers, but settled for a decent all round game.

12 Damian de Allende – 8
Powerful carries and an immense work rate . Showed some great vision in Kolbe try.

ADVERTISEMENT

11 Makazole Mapimpi – 6
Not a day when the game flowed his way. Very few opportunities on attack, but did his job.

Related

10 Elton Jantjies – 2
Didn’t get into his rhythm in the opening half. His first kick hit the uprights from a relatively easy position and then missed another sitter. He then kicked a penalty out behind the corner flag and displayed some very poor options. Was replaced at half-time.

9 Francois de Klerk – 3
His service was not accurate as it should have been, not crisp enough. Took over touch-kicks in the second half and was even more erratic and had far too many shockers.

8 Jasper Wiese – 8
Started with a knock-on from an up-and-under and then penalised for a no-arms tackle. Made plenty of strong carries – his 19 runs earning him 54 metres. His work rate was up there and he made amends for some of those early blunders.

ADVERTISEMENT

7 Franco Mostert – 6
Worked hard off the ball, attended plenty of rucks and made all of his tackles. Not flash, but efficient.

6 Siya Kolisi – 5
Showed some great spirit and defended his teammates against Welsh niggle – getting more involved in off-the-ball chatter. However, generally a quiet day by his standards.

Related

5 Lood de Jager – 6
Penalised for an off-the-ball tackle and his first-half carries were not very effective. Also conceded some penalties, but made an impressive 13 tackles.

4 Eben Etzebeth – 7
Great early line-out steal and kick-charge down inside Wales 22. His tackles count was also into double digits, but like De Jager ge struggled to get over the advantage line with his carries.

3 Frans Malherbe – 5
Was a quiet day at the office and struggled to impose himself in the scrums. Also quiet in general; play.

2 Mbongeni Mbonambi – 6
After a slow start, his work rate increased, making some good ground with strong carries. Scored the Boks’ first try to start the comeback.

1 Ox Nché – 5
No real impact from his four carries, made a handful of tackles and was solid in the scrums.

Replacements:

16 Malcolm Marx – 7
Brought some much-needed power and energy to the forward pack and was part of the massive effort in the last half-hour that got the Boks back in the game.

17 Steven Kitshoff – 5
His scrumming power helped the Boks get the edge in the set pieces, but missed as many tackles as he made and not very effective with ball in hand.

18 Vincent Koch – 6
Solid in the scrums, busy at the breakdowns and missed just one tackle. Good value off the bench.

19 Salmaan Moerat – NA
Not enough time to be rated.

20 Elrigh Louw – 6
Had one very good carry, won a turnover and made his tackles.

21 Kwagga Smith – 8
Brought some much-needed energy to a pedantic pack. Got plenty of metres with his evasive running and made his tackles.

22 Herschel Jantjies – NA
Not enough time to be rated.

23 Willie le Roux – 8
Showed his creative value to the Boks – setting up Kolbe’s try with a crucial play and making plenty of metres when the Bok game screamed for an attacking spark.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
Joseph 897 days ago

The comment re Kolisi reeks of political correctness. Call it as it is - he was rubbish. At best a not very industrious club player; never a top tier international.

Faf, about whom the whole thing revolves, was equally poor. Between the time he telegraphs that he's going to kick and when he finally puts boot to ball, you could make a cup of tea and warm up some toast. He needs a swift kick up the rear or be banished to playing only for his club.

A
Ace 902 days ago

How interesting. On the rugby365 site Kwagga is Albertus, Siya is Siyamthanda, Lood is Lodewyk and, lo, Ox is Retshegofaditswe (I kid you not. Retshegofaditswe).

Why?

The word "pretentious" comes to mind.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search