Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South Africa Rugby to centrally contract players with new league

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND - OCTOBER 23: South Africa leave the field after the Pool C Rugby World Cup 2021 match between England and South Africa at Waitakere Stadium on October 23, 2022 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

South Africa Rugby have announced that they will be launching Women’s Super League Rugby, an elite competition involving centrally contracted players, in 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

They plan to contract as many as 150 players with the “ambition of seeing the Springbok Women emulate their male counterparts by winning the Rugby World Cup.”

It is thought that there will be no more than four or five teams competing, depending on the quality of the submissions put forward by the provincial rugby unions.

Video Spacer

Abbie Ward: Bump in the Road | trailer

Bump in the Road explores the challenges faced by professional female athletes and all working mothers, featuring England lock, Abbie Ward. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Abbie Ward: Bump in the Road | trailer

Bump in the Road explores the challenges faced by professional female athletes and all working mothers, featuring England lock, Abbie Ward. Watch the full documentary on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

SA Rugby have committed to covering the costs of flights and accommodation as well as other expenses for the competing franchises, who will join on a three-year basis.

Contracted players, who will be identified by the SA Rugby High Performance department, will be divided among the teams. The successful franchises are to be announced in October this year.

Those bidding for a place will be required to provide sufficient responses related to minimum standards for: “Governance and funding; player development; coaching; medical and support services such as strength and conditioning, analysis and nutrition; the training and match-day environment; marketing and communications and commercial activities.”

The Bulls Daisies are currently the only contracted full-time squad in their existing league, and it is hoped that the WSLR will be a significant step in levelling the playing field.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springbok Women participated in their first Rugby World Cup in eight years in 2022 after not entering in 2017. They finished fourth in their pool having not won a match.

They secured their qualification for Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 with their Rugby Africa Women’s Cup victory, beating Madagascar 46-17 in the final match.

For a second year, they will compete in WXV 2 on home soil, with three rounds taking place at Cape Town’s DHL and Athlone Sports stadiums this September and October. They will face Japan, Australia, and Italy from 27th September – 12th October with Scotland and Wales also competing in the cross-pool format.

Speaking on the announcement, which was confirmed on South Africa’s National Women’s Day, president of SA Rugby Mark Alexander said: “This is a momentous day for women’s rugby in South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The women’s game is making amazing strides across the world and in South Africa and we want to match that growth by providing an appropriate aspirational, high-performance platform for South African women.

“There is work to be done but the plans we are making will meet the needs of women rugby players and provide the quality of domestic competition that is needed to raise our international playing standards.

Related

“Making this announcement on Women’s Day was done to underline SA Rugby’s commitment to the women’s game.

“We saw the impact of the women’s Sevens event at the Olympics and every measurement available points only to the growth of women’s sport and women’s rugby around the world.

“It has been a priority of ours for several years and this announcement marks a watershed moment for women’s rugby in South Africa.”

SA Rugby CEO Rian Oberholzer said: “The only professionalised women’s leagues in the world are in England and New Zealand and they have only been in operation for half a dozen years or so.

“They are not yet fully professional in the sense that we understand men’s rugby to be. Similarly, our South African model is for a professionalised WSLR with high standards of preparation, training and competition with players who have 12-month-a-year contracts but may also be in tertiary education or in full or part-time employment.

“This is a critical staging post on the ultimate goal of a fully professional women’s game around the world and it is investment for the exponential growth of rugby in South Africa.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
H
Hellhound 134 days ago

That is good to hear. I would prefer like a super 10 series against Aussie and NZ teams like before with the men's teams until NZ thought they going to get clever. They lost out big time there, and the Northern Hemisphere really scored in that regard. However, unlike the men's teams, SA women rugby is not strong. We could really benefit from playing in a league like that. It would also grow the game more because with an international competition like that, it would attract a lot of funding and also enable a lot of younger women to make it a professional career and sport. As long as women have to work and only practice now and then, they won't become better and grow. It's why the Bulls Daisies is so much better and there is no team in SA that can match them. They have professional contracts like the men. It's their job to play and that is it. They deserve to get that chance to become professional players and make it a career.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 27 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search