Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South African franchises face tough future in Super Rugby

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

South Africa will have no sides in the semi-finals of Super Rugby for only the second time in 16 years, but it could be just the start of the country’s declining fortunes in the competition as teams are decimated by player departures.

ADVERTISEMENT

There have been mitigating circumstances to the failures in 2019 with the Lions, Sharks and Stormers in particular being hit by injuries to key players.

The rise of the Jaguares as a force meant the Argentine side finished top of the South African Conference and bagged the precious home-ground advantage in the knockout stages that the Lions had used to reach the three previous finals.

It is fair to say that the South African teams deserved little more, however, with all four proving too inconsistent, home and away, and at times lacking the skill and street-smarts to go with their traditional brawn.

The highlight of the season was an emerging Bulls team that ran the Hurricanes close in their quarter-final in Wellington on Saturday before losing 35-28 but is now also the perfect illustration of the challenges facing South African rugby.

Given time to develop, this could potentially be a championship team in a few years’ time but it will have the guts ripped out of it going into 2020.

Springboks flyhalf Handre Pollard, powerful number eight Duane Vermeulen, locks RG Snyman, Lood de Jager and Jason Jenkins, and centre Jesse Kriel, have all signed for overseas teams.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even promising youngsters Eli Snyman, Hanro Liebenberg and Hendre Stassen will be lost as the lure of the pound, euro and Yen trump the rand and the challenge of Super Rugby.

“Ten of the guys are leaving us, so we’re going to struggle next year I think,” Bulls coach Pote Human told reporters in the wake of their quarter-final loss.

“It’s very disappointing because it’s my first year as head coach of the Bulls and I really thought if we could keep this team for another two years it would be great, but unfortunately that’s not the case.”

The Bulls are not alone; all four South African franchises will face the same challenge and will have to rebuild with new talent in what will be a massive test of rugby depth in the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

But it does not end there. Whatever outstanding talent emerges next year is likely to be an immediate target for overseas clubs, and so the cycle continues.

AAP

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search