Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'South Africa's second XV beat New Zealand's first XV': 101-cap veteran

Beauden Barrett of New Zealand looks on during The Rugby Championship & Bledisloe Cup match between New Zealand All Blacks and Australia Wallabies at Sky Stadium on September 28, 2024 in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

World champions South Africa have three teams that could possibly beat any other team in the world currently, former England scrum-half Danny Care has claimed.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 101-cap veteran, who retired from international rugby earlier this year, made this assertion on his podcast Hits Different alongside fellow host Mark Atkinson and current Harlequins coach, former All Black Nick Evans.

In the section of the show labelled ‘Debatable’, Care and Evans discussed whether South Africa now produce better rugby players than New Zealand. However, the conversation descended into whether the Springboks’ second XV could beat the All Blacks‘ first XV.

Video Spacer

Louis Rees-Zammit – Walk the Talk trailer | RPTV

Wales try-scoring wizard Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for an exclusive chat about life in the NFL. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Louis Rees-Zammit – Walk the Talk trailer | RPTV

Wales try-scoring wizard Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for an exclusive chat about life in the NFL. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

While both Care and Atkinson believe a second-string South Africa side would come out on top, Evans vehemently disagreed, saying they had “no chance”.

Of course, the sides have already met this year, with South Africa coming out on top in back-to-back Tests on their way to winning The Rugby Championship. Scorelines of 31-27 and 18-12 show how close both encounters were, but the Englishman believes the Springboks’ bench, plus seven more players could achieve the same feat.

Fixture
Internationals
Japan
19 - 64
Full-time
New Zealand
All Stats and Data

“You look at the strength in depth in South Africa right now and think they could put three different XVs against any other team in the world and I think they might win or be very, very close,” Care said.

“I think currently South Africa’s second XV would beat the current New Zealand first XV.

ADVERTISEMENT

Atkinson added: “I think they beat them. If you’re signing individuals, then Kiwis still seem like better rugby players as individuals, but at the moment it’s hard to argue that South Africa aren’t producing better teams.

The Quins legend cited former team-mate Andre Esterhuizen, who left the Stoop this summer, as an example of the depth that the Springboks currently have following a Rugby Championship where the centre did not see a minute of action.

“Look at the players that can’t even get in the South Africa team,” the scrum-half added. “Andre Esterhuizen, one of the best players that’s ever worn a Harlequins shirt, currently can’t get a game for South Africa. He would be in the second team. I think they beat New Zealand’s first team.

Related

Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for the latest episode of Walk the Talk to discuss his move to the NFL. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

26 Comments
B
BP 27 days ago

Even as big Bok Supporter, I think that's a stupid statement.

L
LB 27 days ago

The Springboks did play a B team against the pumas and lost.


When the springboks started a B team against the No 10 ranked wallabies, they only led 11-9 until the bomb squad came on.

J
JH 27 days ago

If NZ selected their overseas players, and could have kept the ones that have now been lost to other nations as a result of their outdated policy, they'd have more than enough depth and firepower to match the Boks. The playing field isn't exactly even in this regard.

H
HA 27 days ago

Having read Wayne Smith's observations after recently being with the All Blacks for a week or so, I think there are far more interesting debates to be had about that team's place in world rugby going forward, than hypothetical first and second teams beating other hypothetical first and second teams.

So, having said that, I shall go and look for them.

B
BA 28 days ago

I would not bet money on that

G
GM 28 days ago

Silly, circuitous debate, highlighted by the fact that the All Blacks could also pick a 'Second XV' which on its day could beat the AB 'First XV' - particularly if the same Saffer eligibility rules applied re overseas players (maybe even an AB Third XV could do the job!) SA getting a lot of kudos re depth but ABs are rapidly building depth too.

I
Icefarrow 29 days ago

Define a second XV, because there are multiple definitions. Is it a mixture of experienced and inexperienced players? A team solely comprised of inexperienced players? A development team like your As and XVs? Pretty broad and pointless claim if you leave it ambiguous.

H
HW 29 days ago

The All Blacks are picked from in country. We don't select from overseas players. If all countries picked from in Country playing group how would everyone stack up. Anyway The Sprinboks are playing awesome rugby and have an amazing Coaching group with team strategies that everyone is chasing, good luck to them for many years to come. Die hard All Black Fanatic.

G
GG 28 days ago

HE, would be interesting? Might also be interesting for each country to only pick guys born in their country? Argies will be good.

J
JK 29 days ago

ABs would be better but still behind RSA IRL and possibly FRA

L
Lulu 29 days ago

Picking only local players for SA does not work. Allister Coetsee results show 57-0.

No ways a bok 2nd team can beat AB. With a so called average team they pushed the Boks in both away games.

AB will always remain a dominant team. Simply to much talent at their disposal.

J
JW 29 days ago

Depends how many cards they're asking to be given.


Also sounds like they're suggesting the Springboks’ second XV would beat the Springboks’ first XV.


Fair.

R
RedWarrior 30 days ago

South Africa's A team couldn't beat Ireland's B Team.


Discuss.... (hides under table)

B
BP 27 days ago

Stop taking drugs - you just embracing yourself.

M
MakeOllieMathisAnAB 30 days ago

Yeah nah stick to doing drugs mate.

F
Forward pass 30 days ago

And an NZXV would beat SAs top side. Providing they got a neutral ref and TMO. Perhaps wait until SA is actually the world no 1 before starting this stuff.

J
JD 30 days ago

Care might be right, but as a South African I don't like any form of triumphalism. Success is fleeting and never lasts forever. I prefer to be humble.

G
GG 28 days ago

JD, agree 100 %. For me the benchmark always is the ABs. Beating them for us Saffas is the ultimate as we know how good they are. Trying to compare sides from NH and SH difficult between WC cycles as sides are either ending or starting seasons, and often don’t have all players available due to injury or rest. The best point to measure sides is at WC as then all sides have similar preparation and all available

N
Ninjin 30 days ago

The Springboks are in a good place atm regarding player depht. Just waiting for all the new systems to click and then Care might just be right.

J
Jmann 30 days ago

whatevs...

G
GrahamVF 30 days ago

Be scared - be very scared 👻

U
Utiku Old Boy 30 days ago

Danny Care?! LOL

T
Tom 30 days ago

It'd certainly be a close match. SA strength in depth is ridiculous.

H
Head high tackle 29 days ago

Is that why Arg beat them in the first test? Their depth?

F
Forward pass 30 days ago

As proven v Arg... But the Top side couldnt beat Ireland and needed TMO help to beat NZ.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode The appointment I would make to save Steve Borthwick – Andy Goode
Search