Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'South Africa's second XV beat New Zealand's first XV': 101-cap veteran

Beauden Barrett of New Zealand looks on during The Rugby Championship & Bledisloe Cup match between New Zealand All Blacks and Australia Wallabies at Sky Stadium on September 28, 2024 in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

World champions South Africa have three teams that could possibly beat any other team in the world currently, former England scrum-half Danny Care has claimed.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 101-cap veteran, who retired from international rugby earlier this year, made this assertion on his podcast Hits Different alongside fellow host Mark Atkinson and current Harlequins coach, former All Black Nick Evans.

In the section of the show labelled ‘Debatable’, Care and Evans discussed whether South Africa now produce better rugby players than New Zealand. However, the conversation descended into whether the Springboks’ second XV could beat the All Blacks‘ first XV.

Video Spacer

Louis Rees-Zammit – Walk the Talk trailer | RPTV

Wales try-scoring wizard Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for an exclusive chat about life in the NFL. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Louis Rees-Zammit – Walk the Talk trailer | RPTV

Wales try-scoring wizard Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for an exclusive chat about life in the NFL. Watch the full show on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

While both Care and Atkinson believe a second-string South Africa side would come out on top, Evans vehemently disagreed, saying they had “no chance”.

Of course, the sides have already met this year, with South Africa coming out on top in back-to-back Tests on their way to winning The Rugby Championship. Scorelines of 31-27 and 18-12 show how close both encounters were, but the Englishman believes the Springboks’ bench, plus seven more players could achieve the same feat.

Fixture
Internationals
Japan
19 - 64
Full-time
New Zealand
All Stats and Data

“You look at the strength in depth in South Africa right now and think they could put three different XVs against any other team in the world and I think they might win or be very, very close,” Care said.

“I think currently South Africa’s second XV would beat the current New Zealand first XV.

ADVERTISEMENT

Atkinson added: “I think they beat them. If you’re signing individuals, then Kiwis still seem like better rugby players as individuals, but at the moment it’s hard to argue that South Africa aren’t producing better teams.

The Quins legend cited former team-mate Andre Esterhuizen, who left the Stoop this summer, as an example of the depth that the Springboks currently have following a Rugby Championship where the centre did not see a minute of action.

“Look at the players that can’t even get in the South Africa team,” the scrum-half added. “Andre Esterhuizen, one of the best players that’s ever worn a Harlequins shirt, currently can’t get a game for South Africa. He would be in the second team. I think they beat New Zealand’s first team.

Related

Louis Rees-Zammit joins Jim Hamilton for the latest episode of Walk the Talk to discuss his move to the NFL. Watch now on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

26 Comments
B
BP 57 days ago

Even as big Bok Supporter, I think that's a stupid statement.

L
LB 57 days ago

The Springboks did play a B team against the pumas and lost.


When the springboks started a B team against the No 10 ranked wallabies, they only led 11-9 until the bomb squad came on.

J
JH 57 days ago

If NZ selected their overseas players, and could have kept the ones that have now been lost to other nations as a result of their outdated policy, they'd have more than enough depth and firepower to match the Boks. The playing field isn't exactly even in this regard.

H
HA 57 days ago

Having read Wayne Smith's observations after recently being with the All Blacks for a week or so, I think there are far more interesting debates to be had about that team's place in world rugby going forward, than hypothetical first and second teams beating other hypothetical first and second teams.

So, having said that, I shall go and look for them.

B
BA 58 days ago

I would not bet money on that

G
GM 58 days ago

Silly, circuitous debate, highlighted by the fact that the All Blacks could also pick a 'Second XV' which on its day could beat the AB 'First XV' - particularly if the same Saffer eligibility rules applied re overseas players (maybe even an AB Third XV could do the job!) SA getting a lot of kudos re depth but ABs are rapidly building depth too.

I
Icefarrow 59 days ago

Define a second XV, because there are multiple definitions. Is it a mixture of experienced and inexperienced players? A team solely comprised of inexperienced players? A development team like your As and XVs? Pretty broad and pointless claim if you leave it ambiguous.

H
HW 59 days ago

The All Blacks are picked from in country. We don't select from overseas players. If all countries picked from in Country playing group how would everyone stack up. Anyway The Sprinboks are playing awesome rugby and have an amazing Coaching group with team strategies that everyone is chasing, good luck to them for many years to come. Die hard All Black Fanatic.

G
GG 59 days ago

HE, would be interesting? Might also be interesting for each country to only pick guys born in their country? Argies will be good.

J
JK 59 days ago

ABs would be better but still behind RSA IRL and possibly FRA

L
Lulu 59 days ago

Picking only local players for SA does not work. Allister Coetsee results show 57-0.

No ways a bok 2nd team can beat AB. With a so called average team they pushed the Boks in both away games.

AB will always remain a dominant team. Simply to much talent at their disposal.

J
JW 59 days ago

Depends how many cards they're asking to be given.


Also sounds like they're suggesting the Springboks’ second XV would beat the Springboks’ first XV.


Fair.

R
RedWarrior 60 days ago

South Africa's A team couldn't beat Ireland's B Team.


Discuss.... (hides under table)

B
BP 57 days ago

Stop taking drugs - you just embracing yourself.

M
MakeOllieMathisAnAB 60 days ago

Yeah nah stick to doing drugs mate.

F
Forward pass 60 days ago

And an NZXV would beat SAs top side. Providing they got a neutral ref and TMO. Perhaps wait until SA is actually the world no 1 before starting this stuff.

J
JD 60 days ago

Care might be right, but as a South African I don't like any form of triumphalism. Success is fleeting and never lasts forever. I prefer to be humble.

G
GG 59 days ago

JD, agree 100 %. For me the benchmark always is the ABs. Beating them for us Saffas is the ultimate as we know how good they are. Trying to compare sides from NH and SH difficult between WC cycles as sides are either ending or starting seasons, and often don’t have all players available due to injury or rest. The best point to measure sides is at WC as then all sides have similar preparation and all available

N
Ninjin 60 days ago

The Springboks are in a good place atm regarding player depht. Just waiting for all the new systems to click and then Care might just be right.

J
Jmann 60 days ago

whatevs...

G
GrahamVF 60 days ago

Be scared - be very scared 👻

U
Utiku Old Boy 60 days ago

Danny Care?! LOL

T
Tom 61 days ago

It'd certainly be a close match. SA strength in depth is ridiculous.

H
Head high tackle 59 days ago

Is that why Arg beat them in the first test? Their depth?

F
Forward pass 60 days ago

As proven v Arg... But the Top side couldnt beat Ireland and needed TMO help to beat NZ.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

All you can do is hate on SA. Jealousy makes you nasty and it's never a good look. Those who actually knows rugby is all talking about the depth and standards of the SA players. They don't wear blinders like you. The NH had many years to build the depth and players for multiple competition the SA teams didn't. There will be growing pains. Not least travel issues. The NH teams barely have to travel to play an opponent opposed to the SA teams. That is just one issue. There is many more issues, hence the "growing pains". The CC isn't yet a priority and this is what most people have a problem with. Saying SA is disrespecting that competition which isn't true. SA don't have the funds yet to go big and get the players needed for 3 competitions. It all costs a lot of money. It's over using players and get them injured or prioritising what they can deliver with what are available. To qualify for CC, they need to perform well in the URC, so that is where the main priorities is currently. In time that will change with sponsors coming in fast. They are at a distinct disadvantage currently compared to the rest. Be happy about that, because they already are the best international team. You would have hated it if they kept winning the club competitions like the URC and CC every year too. Don't be such a sourmouth loser. See the complete picture and judge accordingly. There is many factors you aren't even aware of at play that you completely ignore just to sound relevant. Instead of being an positive influence and spread the game and help it grow, we have to read nonsense like this from haters. Just grow up and stop hating on the game. Go watch soccer or something that loves people like you.

129 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search