Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

South America's first professional rugby league will kick off at the end of February

Mateus Estrela Tavares of Brazil fights for the ball with Juan Manuel Etcheverry during a friendly between Brazil and Uruguay in 2014. (Photo by Buda Mendes/Getty Images)

It’s been a long time coming, but South America will finally have a fully professional rugby league from 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Súper Liga will kick off on February 28th and bring together teams from across the continent to vie for South American supremacy.

Argentina and Uruguay both competed at the 2019 World Cup and are without a doubt the strongest two sides in South America, but a total of six nations will compete in the inaugural competition with one team based in each nation.

Joining Argentina and Uruguay are Brazil, Paraguay, Chile and Colombia, as confirmed earlier this week by South American media outlet El Ciudadano.

It’s the first time that we’ve received any sort of clarity over the competition’s make-up, with a number of potential teams and nations touted over the past year.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Argentina, as comfortably the strongest rugby nation in the Americas, will likely provide players to a number of the teams. Their top players, however, will all be tied up with Super Rugby. Players from other non-South American nations may also prop up some of the clubs with a number of Namibian and Portuguese players expected to be revealed in the near-future.

Despite just one team existing for each nation, the clubs aren’t national sides and there’s potential for further teams to be added in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

The six sides are: Los Ceibos (Argentina), Peñarol (Uruguay), Corinthians (Brazil), Olimpia (Paraguay), Selknam (Chile) and Cafeteros (Colombia).

https://www.instagram.com/p/B5WTrucgzqD/

The Súper Liga will run from late February to late May and will see the top five sides compete in a home-and-away round-robin league with semis and a final.

In a somewhat strange twist, Colombia, the weakest nation, will play home-and-away fixtures against the bottom-placed side in the final weeks of the competition to determine 5th and 6th placings.

Colombia simply haven’t got the players to compete week-in and week-out over three months, which has likely determined the unusual competition format.

ADVERTISEMENT

Strength across the board has evidently been a concern for the tournament organisers as the competition has been stripped down to five regular competitors when up to eight were touted at one point.

Regardless, it’s a step in the right direction for the region – however long-term sustainability will be the ultimate judge of success. A number of professional national competitions have been launched over the last ten years that have crumbled after just a few seasons.

Expect further information in the coming weeks with an official press conference to be held next Friday.

England attack coach Scott Wisemantel has departed the England national set-up and is expected to link up with Dave Rennie at the Wallabies:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search