Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springbok player ratings: South Africa vs England 3rd Test

Faf de Klerk during the third test match between South Africa and England at Newlands Stadium

South Africa failed to complete a clean sweep over England at Newlands in Cape Town on Saturday – report Rugby 365.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead, courtesy of some brilliant goal-kicking by Owen Farrell and a Jonny May try, the Springboks went down 10-25 to England in the final June Test series match.

A win for the hosts would have been amazing especially with the news that the encounter could be the last Test match ever played at Newlands.

The result means South Africa win the Series 2-1.

Leezil Hendricks rates the South African players!

15 Warrick Gelant
Showed maturity under the high ball. Not only did he impress with his side-steps but the fullback also displayed great strength with a hand-off on Owen Farrell in the first half. In the second half, the fullback’s grubber was instrumental in Jesse Kriel’s try. But with the switch to wing, his performance faded in the last 20 minutes and conceded two silly penalties.
7

14 Sibusiso Nkosi
Looked keen to get involved, had a couple of great runs and showed vision when he put in a vital grubber which could have resulted in a try at the closing stages of the first half.
6

13 Jesse Kriel
Had a quiet first half but gradually worked himself in the match. He had a valid try-scoring opportunity, along with Sibusiso Nkosi, in the first half, but the Jonny May’s crucial defence came up on tops. However, the centre’s second-half performance was much better and scored the Springboks’ only try in the 45th minute.
6

ADVERTISEMENT

12 André Esterhuizen
Good test, but not a great one. Had some good runs in the second half but struggled to find space. He did put in a noteworthy defensive performance.
5

11 Aphiwe Dyantyi
Less involved than the other wing Nkosi, his first real moment was in the second half with an impressive line break. However, failed to make an impact.
4

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

10 Elton Jantjies
Had a horrendous performance, which included a missed penalty kick in the opening minutes. Also had two catastrophic moments under the high ball.
4

ADVERTISEMENT

9 Faf de Klerk
His box kicks weren’t as accurate as last week. Made some silly errors but put in a few huge tackles – which include the massive hit on No.8 Nathan Hughes.
7

8 Duane Vermeulen
The No.8 bit farewell to the Series with yet another a solid performance. Wasn’t that spectacular as last week but instrumental at the breakdown battle, vital on attack and managed to steal a line-out!
7

7 Pieter-Steph du Toit
Whether at flank or at the lock, Du Toit’s work rate is impeccable. His cover defence in the opening minutes nullified Johnny May’s opportunity to score points. He made some strong carries with ball in hand and was solid in defence.
8

6 Siya Kolisi (captain)
Seems like the breakdown battle kept him busy. He was absent as a captain and failed to lead the team as well as he did in the two previous matches. Subbed after 65 minutes.
5

5 Franco Mostert
Did the basics well, had some carries and set up the Boks try. Was also solid in defence and at line-outs.
5

4 RG Snyman
Similar to his lock partner, Snyman did the basics well, he had a noteworthy run but didn’t bring anything extra.
5

3 Frans Malherbe
Solid shift but failed to make an impact especially in terms of scrummaging. He put in five tackles before he was subbed after 55 minutes.
4

2 Chiliboy Ralepelle
The hooker’s line-out throws were solid, however, he was too over-enthusiastic and conceded silly penalties which handed England a 6-0 lead.
3

1 Tendai Mtawarira
Failed to produce effective carries and struggled to gain the upper hand over England’s prop Kyle Sinckler.
4

Replacements:

16 Schalk Brits (On for Ralepelle, 44th minute)
First touch was a line-out throw which was a perfect platform for the first try of the match. His mobility did not quite suit the wet conditions but a notable impact when he came on.
6

17 Steven Kitshoff (on for Mtawarira, 44th minutes)
Made his presence felt immediately with some huge tackles. He did concede a questionable scrum penalty but other than that the prop proved to be a great replacement.
6

18 Thomas du Toit (on for Malherbe, 44th minutes)
Didn’t make a massive impact, but made a few tackles in open play
5

19 Jean-Luc du Preez (On for Snyman, 58th minutes)
Showed great work rate with a couple of runs and solid tackles.
5

20 Sikhumbuzo Notshe (on for Kolisi, 65th minute)
Not enough time to be rated.

21 Embrose Papier (on for De Klerk, 75th minutes)
Not enough time to be rated.

22 Handré Pollard (on for Jantjies, 58th minute)
The crowd erupted when the flyhalf entered the field. Struggled with his first touches but eventually found his feet and added some value.
5

23 Willie le Roux (On for Nkosi, 50th Minute)
Not perfect but was showed real intent in terms of his attack. Unfortunately his knock-on aided the Jonny May try.
6

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 52 minutes ago
All Blacks player ratings vs Australia | Bledisloe Cup I

Yes I know little of South Africa's past teams I'm afraid, theyve obviously had great teams throughout their history.


You raise a tricky dilemma. Any team is a sum of their parts. To make a point, lets say that South Africa aren't a team that has been able to take advantage, or use all if it's 'parts', to a maximum before, were as you could say that 2015 AB did use all of it's parts and become the 'most complete' team in history. Now a) that might not be exactly true of either team, and b) even if it was true one could argue that doesn't mean the result is going to go one way or the other. SA "limited" style could win out again ABs "complete" style etc.


I'm of the belief that attack trumps defence, that the ball will always beat the man.. that the AB's having been so good because they played the best style of rugby and won against all the odds. They have not had the best players, they make the best of their players. That's what I see clicking in this current side, theyre becoming 'complete' again. I don't know why they've not been able to do it all game. You can point to their discipline but it could easily be a drop in physical conditioning. They've all got bigger, it's been a big area of change in the NZ game. They've also lost cohesion


So yes and no. I think Sacha is someone to enable a complete game, but SA are going to also lose some key 'parts' to there game when the vets retire. Like how NZ still had some 'parts' post 2015, they had no one to link them, hence how I think this team now trumps those because they do look to have someone who can make them complete, despite the individual parts (read "players"). The parts will still matter though, England have some great props coming through, France look to have the best trajectory, will there be enough pieces for Sacha to put together? Your forwards will play a big factor, I really like the idea of BJD offload game adding to that completeness. That certainly doesn't take away from what theyve done, they might indeed have beat that opposite idea, or this new team. Certainly the chance is there to do it, and this current team hasn't been doing it. It will be hard to think of a 'great' team that is actually 'two' teams over a 4 year period!

58 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Rassie Erasmus should cull some Boks veterans for 2027 Why Rassie Erasmus should cull some Boks veterans for 2027
Search