Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springbok Player Ratings - vs Pumas

Faf de Klerk

The Springboks got their Rugby Championship campaign off to a winning start when they beat Argentina 34-21 in Durban.

ADVERTISEMENT

Warren Fortune rates the South African players.

15 Willie le Roux:
A constant threat on attack and a better flyhalf than Handre Pollard. His pin-point kick for Aphiwe Dyantyi’s first try was outstanding.
8/10

14 Makazole Mapimpi:
He made great use of the space he was given out wide and he scored two tries in the win. He notched up more running metres than anyone else in his team.
8/10

13 Lukhanyo Am:
He defended well and showed his strength in the tackle, especially for his try. However, he is just a bit predictable in his channel on attack.
6/10

12 André Esterhuizen:
He was tasked with absorbing as much defenders as possible when he crashed the ball up and he felt comfortable with his Sharks teammate outside him.
6.5/10

11 Aphiwe Dyantyi:
His finishing was impeccable, and he just showed some great awareness for the play around him. Another two tries for the speedster as well.
8.5/10

10 Handré Pollard:
He has a very poor game. He looked predictable with ball in hand and his kicking game was not up to standard. His distribution was shocking at times.
4/10

ADVERTISEMENT

9 Faf de Klerk:
He improved tremendously as the game went on. He kept Argentina’s defence guessing and he had a hand in two of his team’s tries and he scored one himself.
8/10

8 Warren Whiteley:
It was a bit of a mix bag from the No.8. He could have helped a bit more at the breakdowns, but his defence was good.
5/10

7 Siyamthanda Kolisi (captain):
He seemed to go missing for large periods. However, he was aggressive on defence and he got his team over the gain line with some nice carries.
6/10

6 Francois Louw:
He looked a bit lethargic on the field, but he was a threat at the breakdowns and he did his part on defence.
6/10

ADVERTISEMENT

5 Pieter-Steph du Toit:
An absolute monster on defence. He made more tackles than anyone else on the field and never missed one.
7.5/10

4 Eben Etzebeth:
It was his first game back from a long injury lay-off and he was immense in open play. He carried the ball more than anyone else in his team and he made some serious metres.
9/10

3 Frans Malherbe:
He was strong in the scrums, but we didn’t see too much of him in open play.
6/10

2 Malcolm Marx:
He was outstanding at the breakdowns where he won several turnovers. However, his line-out throwing was shocking on a few occasions in the strike zone.
7/10

1 Tendai Mtawarira:
He was a Beast in the scrums and showed incredible power in the tackle.
7/10

Replacements:

16 Bongi Mbonambi (On for Malcolm Marx, 65th min)
Not enough time to be rated.

17 Steven Kitshoff (On for Tendai Mtawarira, 52nd min)
He had some good carries and he gave his pack a bit of power up front.
6/10

18 Thomas du Toit (On for Frans Malherbe, 58th min)
He brought some great energy up front. He put in a few good tackles and won a turnover.
6/10

19 Marvin Orie
Not used.

20 Marco van Staden (On for Francios Louw, 60th min)
It was a good cameo from the new cap and he ended the match with a nice turnover.
5/10

21 Embrose Papier (On for Aphiwe Dyantyi, 74th min)
Not enough time to be rated.

22 Lionel Mapoe (On for Lukhanyo Am, 73rd min)
Not enough time to be rated.

23 Damian Willemse (On for Andre Esterhuizen, 63rd min)
He didn’t get much opportunity to show what he can do.
5/10

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 2 hours ago
Brett Robinson looks forward to 'monumental' year in 2025

I'm not very hopeful of a better change to the sport. Putting an Aussie in charge after they failed for two decades is just disgusting. What else will be brought in to weaken the game? What new rule changes will be made? How will the game be grown?


Nothing of value in this letter. There is no definitive drive towards something better. Just more of the same as usual. The most successful WC team is getting snubbed again and again for WC's hosting rights. What will make other competitions any different?


My beloved rugby is already a global sport. Why is there no SH team chosen between the Boks, AB's, Wallabies and Fiji? Like a B&I Lions team to tour Europe and America? A team that could face not only countries but also the B&I Lions? Wouldn't that make for a great spectacle that will also bring lots of eyeballs to the sport?


Instead with an Aussie in charge, rugby will become more like rugby league. Rugby will most likely become less global if we look at what have become of rugby in Australia. He can't save rugby in Australia, how will he improve the global footprint of rugby world wide?


I hope to be proven wrong and that he will raise up the sport to new heights, but I am very much in doubt. It's like hiring a gardener to a CEO position in a global company expecting great results. It just won't happen. Call me negative or call me whatever you'd like, Robinson is the wrong man for the job.

3 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

The question that pops into my mind with Fergus Burke, and a few other high profile players in his boots right now, and also many from the past to be fair, is can the club scene start to take over this sentimentality of test footy being the highest level? Take for a moment a current, modern day scenario of Toulouse having a hiccup and failing to make this years Top 14 Final, we could end up seeing the strongest French side in History touring New Zealand next year. Why? Because at any one time they could make up over half the French side, but although that is largely avoided, it is very likely at the national teams detriment with the understanding these players have of playing together likely being stronger than the sum of the best players throughout France selected on marginal calls.


Would the pinnacle of the game really not be reached in the very near future by playing for a team like Toulouse? Burke might have put himself in a position where holding down a starting spot for any nation, but he could be putting himself in the hotbed of a new scene. Clearly he is a player that cherishes International footy as the highest level, and is possibly underselling himself, but really he might just be underselling these other nations he thinks he could represent.

Burke’s decision to test the waters with either England or Scotland has been thrown head-first into the spotlight by the relative lack of competition for the New Zealand 10 shirt.

This is the most illogical statement I've ever read in one of your articles Nick. Burke is behind 3 All Stars of All Black rugby, it might be a indictment of New Zealand rugby but it is abosolutely apparent (he might have even said so himself) why he decided to test the waters.

He mattered because he is the kind of first five-eighth New Zealand finds it most difficult to produce from its domestic set-up: the strategic schemer, the man who sees all the angles and all the bigger potential pictures with the detail of a single play.

Was it not one of your own articles that highlighted the recent All Black nature to select a running, direct threat, first five over the last decade? There are plenty of current players of Burke's caliber and style that simply don't fit the in vogue mode of what Dan Carter was in peoples minds, the five eight that ran at the slightest hole and started out as a second five. The interesting thing I find with that statement though is that I think he is firmly keeping his options open for a return to NZ.

A Kiwi product no longer belongs to New Zealand, and that is the way it is. Great credo or greater con it may be, but the free market is here to stay.

A very shortsighted and simplistic way to end a great article. You simply aren't going to find these circumstances in the future. The migration to New Zealand ended in 1975, and as that generation phases out, so too will the majority of these ancestry ties (in a rugby context) will end. It would be more accurate to say that Fergus Burke thought of himself as the last to be able to ride this wave, so why not jump on it? It is dying, and not just in the interests or Scottish of English fans.

47 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market
Search