Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks-All Blacks tours agreed to place Rugby Championship in doubt

The All Blacks perform the Haka as South African players look on ahead of the Rugby Championship international rugby match between South Africa and New Zealand at the Mbombela Stadium in Mbombela on August 6, 2022. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)

A new touring proposal between South Africa and New Zealand has been agreed between the two unions according to a report by The Telegraph, with contract talks at the final stages.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand will tour South Africa in 2026 with eight games proposed, including three Tests between the All Blacks and Springboks, before New Zealand host South Africa four years later in 2030.

South African publication The Daily Maverick reported representatives met in the lead-up to the Ellis Park Test last weekend, won by the Springboks 31-27.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The proposed tour, which will require sign off from World Rugby, is set to drastically change the Southern Hemisphere calendar in those years with The Rugby Championship model surely in doubt.

“I just spent two days with the New Zealand leadership in what we are calling the greatest rugby rivalry,” said Rian Oberholzer, chief executive of the South African Rugby Union.

“It’s a working title, although some people might say it is arrogant to say that.

“We have signed a memorandum of understanding and we are in the planning phases now. We have a draft schedule that must still be agreed.

“It is a collaboration of two unions that have agreed to work together off the field. We believe we have to be closer – and we have never been close.

“Let’s fight on the field and let’s work off the field to the betterment of both of the unions.”

Oberholzer confirmed that discussions with Australia and Argentina were underway with SARU tabling an amended version of the Rugby Championship.

“If it is not going to happen, we as SARU did say to Argentina and Australia that we will play one-off Test matches against them,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

16 Comments
T
Terry24 108 days ago

Not much loyalty being shown to Australian or Argentinian Rugby here. Used to be a time when test matches involved more honour. Now at the altar of the RWC, honour/right/wrong are out the window. The only considerations are $ and what helps NZ/SA win a RWC.

R
RugCs 108 days ago

So Ben copied and pasted everything from a proper journalist trying to pass this off as his work. It’s called plagiarism. Can he not come up with an original thought other than gutter trolling…

D
DP 108 days ago

actually good point - he's the editor in chief and he's copying and pasting.. goes to show how lax the standards at World Rugby are..

D
DP 108 days ago

Ben Smith clearly doubling down for this weekends result before he gives us Bok supporters both barrels.. watch this space...

F
Forward pass 108 days ago

it says nothing as to why it will effect the RC.

W
Wayneo 108 days ago

Will be played in the same test window as the RC & the money from the next RC broadcast agreement will be a lot less for Australia than it is now.

T
TT 108 days ago

Great stuff.


3 test series always the best competition.

A 4th test a bit of over kill but it is only 1/ 4 years.


Next best is the World Rugby Nation's Cup, ie or at least the only thing it actually adds ie a World best team final biennially between the 2 champions of 6N & RC.


Much better championship than the 4 yearly RWC. The RWC is a dated concept ie the idea that the winner is the best team or 'champion' for 4 years.

But winning a RWC that specific tournament every 4years. Which is fine but it should be named so ie Champion of World Series.

The new biennial World Rugby Test championship will be actual measure of ' current best team '.

RWC can continue as a big & great Rugby spectacle & $ spinner. Great stuff.

B
Bull Shark 108 days ago

The current best measures of who are the world’s best tests teams are well established and effective.


RWC winners. RC winners. 6N winners. World Rankings. The only fans who need another or more competitions are teams who haven’t been able to win the largest tournament of them all, that literally involves every rugby playing nation in the world.


And on a separate note - it would appear as though Bongi’s try was legit. So the Boks didn’t ONLY WIN because of a ref. And we won’t deep dive the double bank maul try and Sam cane high hit on Kolisi. All inconvenient.


Good luck to you on Saturday. I suspect the ABs can pull off a win there - because they’re a great team. Try and be a better fan if they do.

N
Ninjin 108 days ago

This will be better than the RC imho.

S
SteveD 108 days ago

Much much better. The E-W travelling has always been ridiculous, for both internationals and so-called 'Super Rugby' and this is why the RWC has been the only real test of any team, as the visitors have time to get over jetlag and acclimatise as well. Fair enough there's always home town advantage but at least it's minimized.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search