Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks coach Nienaber on new scrumhalf Cobus Reinach

Cobus Reinach breaks to score for South Africa during the recent World Cup (Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

South Africa will be without key flanker Pieter-Steph du Toit and scrumhalf Faf de Klerk for the deciding Test against the British & Irish Lions on Saturday as coach Jacques Nienaber was forced into making three changes to his team.

ADVERTISEMENT

Franco Mostert moves from lock to the side of the scrum to replace Du Toit, who was injured inside the opening 20 minutes of Saturday’s 27-9 victory that levelled the series at 1-1.

Lood de Jager, who made a massive impact off the bench in that fixture, takes over from Mostert in the second row.

Video Spacer

Lood de Jager on ‘personal’ second test against the Lions

Video Spacer

Lood de Jager on ‘personal’ second test against the Lions

Cobus Reinach has not featured in the series yet but replaces De Klerk, with Herschel Jantjies again on the bench despite coming on for De Klerk in the first two games.

Reinach’s greater experience of having played in England likely got him the nod from the start.

South Africa have deviated from their preferred 6-2 split on the bench between forwards and backs and this time will have three backline players among the replacements, including flyhalf Morne Steyn who kicked the Boks to victory in the 2009 series against the Lions.

“This is a massive Test for us with the series on the line, so it was important for us to maintain consistency in selection following on last week’s performance,” Nienaber said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Cobus is an experienced player with a calm head and who can handle pressure and we believe he will be able to dictate play well alongside Handre Pollard.

“I am delighted for Morne – he is a world class player and his work ethic and positive attitude on and off the field since joining the team in (a training camp in) Bloemfontein has been impressive.

“He can also perform under extreme pressure, as he shown for the Springboks and the Bulls, and that skill will be invaluable in such a vital Test.”

The tempestuous series has involved plenty of needle and Nienaber is expecting the same on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are preparing for a physical encounter and we know that every small battle will count if we want to win the series,” he said.

“This match is as important to us as it is for the Lions, so we know it is going to be tight and we will have to capitalise on every opportunity we have to score points and be effective in every area of our game.”

Team: Willie le Roux, Cheslin Kolbe, Lukhanyo Am, Damian de Allende, Makazole Mapimpi, Handré Pollard, Cobus Reinach, Jasper Wiese, Franco Mostert, Siya Kolisi, Lood de Jager, Eben Etzebeth, Frans Malherbe, Bongi Mbonambi, Steven Kitshoff. Replacements: Malcolm Marx, Trevor Nyakane, Vincent Koch, Marco van Staden, Kwagga Smith, Herschel Jantjies, Morne Steyn, Damian Willemse.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search