Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks dominate in 2024 despite ill-discipline

South Africa recieved 13 yellow cards in 2024. (Photo by Rodger Bosch / AFP) (Photo by RODGER BOSCH/AFP via Getty Images)

Getting on the right side of the referee has long been advocated as a quality all champion teams must possess but Opta data suggests the Springboks bucked the trend in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

Second-guessing how the referee will interpret the laws, and managing him or her throughout the game, can mean the difference between winning and losing.

However, the Springboks debunked this notion as they marched to The Rugby Championship title and completed their first European tour clean sweep in 11 years despite conceding the most yellow cards of the year.

South Africa incurred 13 sin-binnings at an average of exactly one per game, which was only ‘beaten’ by Georgia (a 1.1 average), who incidentally also overcame the handicap of being numerically challenged in most games to maintain their vice-like grip on the Rugby Europe Championship trophy.

yellow cards, 2024

In only four of their 13 Tests (11 wins and two defeats) did South Africa keep all 15 players on the field of play for the full 80 minutes: the second Test v Ireland, which they lost by a point,  and in wins against Australia and Argentina in The Rugby Championship (rounds two and six) and the final Test of the year against Wales.

Having never previously received three yellow cards in a match in 133 years of playing Test rugby, South Africa suffered that fate in back-to-back games in July and August, against Portugal and Australia. However, Andre Esterhuizen’s yellow against Os Lobos, in the Springboks’ final Rugby Championship warm-up fixture, was ultimately upgraded to a red.

ADVERTISEMENT

Interestingly, the finger of blame cannot be pointed to the big bruisers up front but rather to the back three contingent, who accounted for just over half of the tally of 13 yellow cards between them. Winger Kurt-Lee Arendse was the biggest culprit with three, while full-back options Willie le Roux and Aphelele Fassi accounted for two apiece.

Not that losing a man to the sin-bin was catastrophic for the Springboks, even with a new defensive system under Jerry Flannery. South Africa conceded an average of five points for every sin-bin period during The Rugby Championship, but in the Autumn Nations Series, the yellow cards to Makazole Mapimpi and Gerhard Steenekamp only cost them three points.

While they were not exactly whistled off the park, six teams conceded fewer penalties per match than the Springboks’ average of 10.1, with England leading the way on 9.25. Not that it did Steve Borthwick’s team much good.

South Africa’s biggest repeat offence was at the ruck, where their tally of 64 penalties was the second-highest of the year behind Scotland (69). One area where the Springboks reigned supreme, however, was at scrum time. The Springboks conceded a scrum penalty roughly every other game whereas the next-best team in that regard was New Zealand (1.07).

ADVERTISEMENT

As for the rest, if you combine the card count with penalties conceded, Fiji are the team with the most work to do going into 2025. Mick Byrne’s team conceded a 2024 high of 11.2 penalties per game, while also collecting nine yellow cards and two reds.

Fiji, red card, Waisea Nayacalevu
CARDIFF, WALES – NOVEMBER 10: Waisea Nayacalevu of Fiji reacts as Referee Luc Ramos shows a red card to Semi Radradra of Fiji (not pictured) following a Bunker Review (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images).

France and Japan had the best record in 2024 in terms of yellow cards, only losing a man to the sin-bin every three to four games (an average of 0.27). But their record was marred by two red cards and in the case of Les Bleus, disciplinary problems away from the field.

Eddie Jones’ decision to blood a load of uncapped front-row forwards will, hopefully, stand the Brave Blossoms in good stead for Men’s Rugby World Cup 2027, but it came at a cost in terms of scrum penalties conceded in 2024, with 26 given away in their 10 games. Argentina and Wales were the only other teams to average two scrum penalties or more per match in 2024.

Samoa and England, meanwhile, were the ‘cleanest’ teams when it came to overall discipline. England’s penalty average per match was among those lower than Samoa’s 10.33 (ranked first with 9.25) but they received four yellows and a red – Charlie Ewels v Japan, as opposed to Samoa’s three yellow cards and one red. Even so, discipline is one positive that Steve Borthwick’s team can take from an otherwise forgettable 2024.

Related

Go behind the scenes of both camps during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 2021. Binge watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV now 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
f
fl 3 hours ago

What these stats actually seem to show is that there isn't a massive about of variation in the number of cards/penalties conceded by the top teams.


South Africa received 13 yellow cards in 13 matches; Ireland received 11 in 12; New Zealand received 11 in 14. The difference is pretty immaterial.


In terms of penalties, SA conceded 131 in 13 matches; England conceded 111 in 12. Considering England had the best record of anyone, SA are hardly far off the pace.

J
Jon 2 hours ago

Yes I was surprised at how close the pen count was - the spread between best and worst being just 2. The number of yellow cards though will surely be something the Boks will look to address

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 3 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

3 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 12 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search