Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks' hopes of defending World Cup rest on getting Am call right

Lukhanyo Am passes during a South Africa Springboks Captain's Run at Mount Smart Stadium on July 14, 2023 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Fiona Goodall/Getty Images)

Let’s work under the assumption that Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber wouldn’t waste around £3,000 (or R70,000) of SA Rugby’s money on a needless business class flight from Johannesburg to Paris.

ADVERTISEMENT

There must be a reason they called upon the services of Lukhanyo Am to replace the injured Makazole Mapimpi. Well, only two reasons, really. Either he has made the 11 hour trip to carry tackle bags and water bottles, provide moral support and offer his services on the training pitch. Or the Springboks coaches are planning on shoehorning him into the match-day 23 as the defending champions gear up for a quarterfinal against France in Paris.

Only the former makes sense. The second could be disastrous for South Africa’s World Cup title aspirations.

A quick caveat before we continue. At his best, Am is one of the game’s best players. Not just one of the game’s best midfielders but one of the best anywhere on the park. His reading of space on both attack and defence is almost telepathic. He marshals a backline with Napoleonic control and combines natural athleticism with the softest of hands and the most delicate touches. They could replace rugby balls with quail eggs and Am would would go the whole 80 minutes without breaking one.

That is Am at his best but we he hasn’t been anywhere near that for some time. Between 2018 and 2022, he was making a serious claim to being the greatest outside centre in South Africa’s post-isolation period. No-look passes, behind-the-back-offloads, try-assists and a highlight reel bursting with wonder plays became his forte.

But two knee injuries – the first in September 2022 and the second in August this year during a World Cup warm-up match against Argentina in Buenos Aires – curtailed his progress. He wasn’t a spent force, but there was a clear lack of sharpness in both action and thought.

In a way he is a victim of his own success. It is only against his own ridiculous standards that we judge him. But elite sport is a cruel business, and taking a gamble on him now would be folly.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

“Anyone who is in the squad will put their hand up for contention,” said Felix Jones, the Springboks assistant coach who pulled a play from the RassNaber book by keeping all eventualities open.

“We’ll see how he rocks up and how he performs in training over the next two weeks. He’s been doing a graduated return from his injury. We’ve been in contact with the Sharks’ medical staff about strength and conditioning in terms of the amount of rugby he’s been getting through at training. He’s been tracking very well and that’s why we’ve selected him.”

Jones continued: “Lukhanyo is quite an experienced player and he’s been part of the group for many years now. I think we can agree that when Lukhanyo’s at his best, he can slot into any team, and we will be banking on his experience and ability.”

There’s that caveat again and the word ‘if’ is doing a lot of heavy lifting. The truth is the Springboks can’t afford to gamble on a player even a fraction off the pace in the crucial slot at outside centre. Their defence is built around a frenetic blitz that is often ignited by the man at 13. Jesse Kriel has become the leader of this rush in Am’s absence and the stats show that when Kriel starts, the Springboks concede fewer line-breaks, make more tackles, concede fewer entries into their own 22, concede fewer points per the opposition’s entry into their 22 and they win more turnovers, a consequence of their tackle dominance and ability to isolate ball carriers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whether or not Antoine Dupont plays in that quarterfinal, France will look to cut their way through or work their way around the onrushing men in green. Canan Moodie is one of the most gifted and exciting young talents in the world, but he was twice exposed by Tonga when tasked with the job of defending the outside centre channel – by all accounts one of the toughest assignments on a rugby pitch.

Kriel has to start against France. With a 6-2 bench split being the most likely approach the Boks’ coaches will take, there is simply no room for Am. One of those backs has to be a scrum-half with Cobus Reinach in the driver’s seat given his extra pace and ability to cover wing. And the other member on the bench has to either have a turn of pace or possess the attributes to run a backline. Even if the Boks go 5-3 to better accommodate both Manie Libbok and Handre Pollard in the match-day 23, they would still have to start Kriel at 13.

Related

So, where does this leave Am? And, more to the point, why exactly was he included in the squad when selecting a hooker might have made more sense?

Now we’re getting into intangibles. The Springboks are a team that runs on vibes and narrative. Am’s inclusion, and indeed his own arc, from world-beater to injured outcast to returning hero, is worthy of an episode in a documentary series.

There’s already a video doing the rounds on social media of Siya Kolisi greeting Am on the training pitch. South Africa’s captain wears the look of someone stumbling upon a long-lost mate on a deserted beach somewhere. He can barely contain his joy and the pair embrace like Morgan Freeman and Tim Robbins at the end of Shawshank Redemption.

Selecting a player for the gees – Afrikaans for spirit – has been done before and to good effect. Bobby Skinstad’s contributions off the field during the triumphant World Cup of 2007 were more important than anything he did on the pitch in France. The same is true of Schalk Brits and his role in 2019.

Besides carrying tackle bags and replicating the attacking patterns of the French midfield, Am could play that role over the next fortnight. If he does, South Africa might get the energy boost needed to beat the hosts on their own patch. Anything more, though, and Am’s 11 hour return flight might come sooner than was hoped.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

18 Comments
J
Jaco 442 days ago

The arrival of Lukhanyo simply means Nienaber is going to play Moodie on the wing for the rest of the tournament. Then there is no cover for Kriel. If disaster strikes and Jesse is injured, Am would be the best option as replacement.

C
Charlie 443 days ago

There’s something which l certainly can’t get it around my head, Scotland Vs Ireland can’t both win the game& have 5points each, one has to be a winner & the other loser, now where does Springbok stands on that? Surely Springbok could be in Position 2 or 1, which could pave a way to qualifications

B
Brett 444 days ago

Am is world class and if for, should start

T
Toddy 444 days ago

Mapimpi, Am and Moodie, just wow. All 3 are generational players with insane talent, would be awesome to see them all on the field playing

J
Justin 444 days ago

My 2 cents. Play a 6:2, but at the expense of Arendse, play Grant Williams on the wing. Then we can have both Am and Pollard on the bench or Manie and Jessie...I'd love to see what Manie and Am can do, but it's no time for trials. May want to continue with Manie and Jessie, and bring Pollard and Am on with 30 to play.. A nice problem to have. Pity we didn't have one more pool game to trial things.

T
Turlough 444 days ago

A lot of dice rolling by Erasmus. If you're confident with what you have you being in cover. If you're not you bring in Pollard. Am etc.

SA massively worried about the likely match against France in Paris. If SA thought beating Ireland in Paris was hard.....

That's why the SA-IRE match felt like a knockout match. It de facto was one. FRANCE-ENGLAND semi from that side.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 37 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search