Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks left to sweat on Siya Kolisi injury

Siya Kolisi of the Sharks looks on in the warm up during the Heineken Champions Cup match between Toulouse and Sharks at Stade Ernest Wallon on April 08, 2023 in Toulouse, France. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The Sharks Director of Rugby Neil Powell says his team’s quarterfinal trip to Dublin is not mission impossible despite some major injury concerns.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sharks captain Siya Kolisi and flyhalf Curwin Bosch both left prematurely during the 22-22 draw to Munster on Saturday.

The Springbok captain Kolisi had to replace in the opening 10 minutes of the match after he sustained a knee injury, incurred during a tackle by Calvin Nash.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

He tried to play on but struggled to shake off the niggle.

Flyhalf Bosch left the field just short of the half-time break when the Sharks were leading 19-3.

Speaking to reporters after the match Sharks Director of Rugby Neil Powell revealed the severity of the injuries will be confirmed on Monday.

“We will have to wait for the doctor to do a proper assessment on Siya’s knee,” Powell said.

“I think [Bosch] has a rib injury. We will also assess him and get feedback from the doctor. We should know by Monday what the extent of those two injuries are.”

Despite the anxious wait, Powell is confident the Sharks have enough quality to fill the void should Kolisi be ruled out of the play-offs phase in two weeks’ time.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have enough quality to stand in for him,” Powell said.

“Phepsi [Buthelezi] is a really good player. It was unfortunate that we lost Siya so early in the game. He is influential as a captain and player. But, like I say, there is still enough quality in our squad to fill his boots.”

Monday’s news will have a major impact on the Springboks.

Should the scans reveal that the Bok captain has torn cruciate ligaments then he will face a race against time for the 2023 World Cup in France in September.

The Sharks’ final round-robin league match was literally a game of two halves.

The Durban side took a 19-3 lead at half-time and within four minutes of the second half made it 22-3. The Sharks looked well on their way to a famous victory.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, a Munster penalty try instigated the Sharks’ implosion. They conceded two additional tries and had to hold on for a draw.

The result means, the Sharks secured the eighth spot on the overall log and will travel to Dublin to face Leinster in the quarterfinals.

“We all know that Leinster is a quality side, they play a good brand of rugby,” Powell said.

“To beat them at home its obviously going to be a massive challenge. But we showed glimpses of what this team is capable of in the first 40 minutes of [the draw against Munster].

“If we can manage to put in an 80-minute performance it will give us an opportunity to beat a quality side like Leinster.

“The Bulls showed us last year when they beat them in the semifinal of the URC.

“So it’s not going to be easy but it is possible.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search