Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks' 'most enjoyable' tour verdict is warning to the world

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Watch out world was the reading between the lines takeaway after Springboks head coach Jacques Nienaber described the past four weeks in charge of the team as one of the most enjoyable periods ever. It was quite the claim.

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa only won two of their four matches, copping an amount of flak from their fans at home in the earlier part of the tour. There was also a hugely distracting controversy over the Rassie Erasmus, which ended in a two-game match day ban for the director of rugby.

And then there was the frequent card trouble, reds for the unrelated du Toits, Pieter-Steph and Thomas, for their respectively bruising contact with an opposition head and also a yellow that on another day could have been red for Cheslin Kolbe.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

They were the sort of headaches that should have deeply pained the Springboks head coach and yet there was Nienaber, a picture of serenity at his post-game media conference and signing off on the European tour as if it had been a thing of beauty.

If these are the type of punches that the Springboks can capably roll with on a November jaunt that took them to Dublin, Marseille, Genoa and London, then the warning to the world ten months out for their World Cup title defence is that they are ready for everything and anything that might get thrown their way in France.

Related

Asked to sum up the tour, Nienaber enthused in the wake of the Springboks’ 27-13 win over England: “I said it to the team afterwards, it was probably one of the most enjoyable four weeks that I have had. Although we only won 50 per cent of our games, I thought in terms of the working relationship between the coaching staff, between the staff, between the performance staff, between the players, our game drivers, I thought there was clarity.

“I thought we really gelled well so although we didn’t get the result in the first two games on tour, I thought we were in a with a chance and so yeah, it was enjoyable. We were creative in terms of the plans we made and we stuck with it and yeah, we gave it a good go in terms of that.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There were a lot of other enjoyable times but I thought this group, these four games, they really came up with great ownership from a players’ point of view, from a management point of view and that was quite pleasing.”

Incredibly, Nienaber even admitted to not knowing the full-time Twickenham score. “It was a stern challenge. I mean, we needed to get out stuff right on the day. It was definitely if you look, I don’t even know what the scoreline was, I mean it was a humdinger for me up to the end. We all saw what England is capable of last weekend, they came back (against the All Blacks).

“From our side, from the coaching box, we knew they had the ability in them like they did last week. You are never comfortable. We pushed hard to try and get territory, to try and get another score because we felt it was a little bit too close but yeah, happy for the guys sticking and pulling it off at the end.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
F
Flankly 755 days ago

Roughly at parity with the first and second ranked teams, controlled dominance against Italy, and a convincing defeat of a strong England team. Much of this was achieved in the absence of many first choice players, and with a numeric disadvantage due to cards. Also some real evidence of incisive attacking patterns. Of course Nienaber would have wanted the Ireland and France games to have ended with wins on the scoreboard, but he has a lot to smile about.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search