Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks player ratings vs England | Rugby World Cup 2023

South Africa's lock RG Snyman (L) celebrates with teammates after scoring a try during the France 2023 Rugby World Cup semi-final match between England and South Africa at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, on the outskirts of Paris, on October 21, 2023. (Photo by FRANCK FIFE / AFP) (Photo by FRANCK FIFE/AFP via Getty Images)

Springboks player ratings: How on earth did they do that? So many of them were terrible. Truly terrible. And yet they found a way. That is the sign of a champion side. Just remarkable.

ADVERTISEMENT

15  – Damian Willemse – 3
Made the ball look like a bar of soap which is not ideal for a fullback in a game littered with kicks. Covered the ground when asked to field raking English kicks but couldn’t control it once he got there. Also cost his team three points when he threw a reckless pass to Manie Libbok under pressure in his own half which led to a penalty fort England. Replaced by Wille le Roux on 44 minutes.

14 – Kurt-Lee Arendse – 4
Anonymous but chased with great heart throughout. Not a game for wingers. 

Video Spacer

Big Jim Show – RWC Semi Finals

Dan Carter will join Big Jim on Saturday, watch live before and after the game! 19:20 BST & 12 mins after FT.

Join Us

Video Spacer

Big Jim Show – RWC Semi Finals

Dan Carter will join Big Jim on Saturday, watch live before and after the game! 19:20 BST & 12 mins after FT.

Join Us

13 – Jesse Kriel – 5
Tackled when required but if this was not a game for wingers then it definitely was not a game for outside centres.

12 – Damian de Allende  – 5
Did anyone notice him on the field? Of course it wasn’t his fault he might as well have been a spectator. This was never going to be a game for hard carrying centres. Did however get stuck into a driving maul that fizzled to nothing.

11 – Cheslin Kolbe – 5
See Arendse’s report. Zipped about in the wet like a Jack Russell retrieving a ball from a lake.

10 – Manie Libbok – 2
It was impossible not to feel anything but sympathy for the maverick 10 who got the shepherd’s crook after just half an hour. It was hardly his fault the team around him served up absolute dross, or that his tight five was dominated. This meant he barely got any front-foot ball to unfurl his attacking flair, though the wet conditions didn’t help either. His brief performance was encapsulated by his final act, a poor kick out of hand after Franco Mostert stole a line-out. Made way for Handre Pollard.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ruck Speed

0-3 secs
29%
38%
3-6 secs
25%
35%
6+ secs
43%
24%
67
Rucks Won
52

9 – Cobus Reinach – 3
Just like Libbok, his last act was a poor high kick that ignited a chain reaction that led to an England penalty. He hurried and hustled, but couldn’t exert any influence on the match. Hard to think of a single play that he performed at a high level. Replaced by Faf de Klerk two minutes after the break.

1 – Steven Kitshoff  – 5
Gave away a needless penalty when he went in early and skew at the scrum inside England’s red zone and was otherwise unreliable when carrying into contact. Got his hefty frame about but failed to make much of an impact. Subbed for Ox Nche on 49 minutes.,

2 – Bongi Mbonambi – 4
Fair play to him, he found his target from the line-out before RG Snyma’s try, but mostly made a dog’s breakfast of the set-piece. Missed his jumper with his first throw and couldn’t put it in straight with his second. After South Africa’s scrum managed to gain the ascendancy and won a penalty, handing Mbonambi the feed up the field, he once again missed his jumper. To make things worse, he regularly botched the ball at the back of the maul.

3 – Frans Malherbe – 5
Not the only man in green to file one under ‘anonymous’. Would have hoped for more involvement in the scrum in such slippery conditions but was kept at arm’s length from the action.

ADVERTISEMENT

Set Plays

7
Scrums
8
43%
Scrum Win %
88%
10
Lineout
19
70%
Lineout Win %
79%
6
Restarts Received
6
100%
Restarts Received Win %
83%

4 – Eben Etzebeth – 2
Subbed after just five minutes into the second half. Quite possibly his worst game for his country in 118 Tests. Usually the sharpest man on the field, one who finds loopholes in the rulebook and bulldozes through them, he coughed up a needless penalty when he went early around the ruck just as the Boks were starting to pull back momentum in the first half. Switched for RG Snyman.

5 – Franco Mostert – 6
One of only a few players who at least delivered something close to a commendable show. Made 18 tackles, challenged England’s line-out and carried well around the fringe. Still, he knocked on on several occasions in the tackle, proving that even the shining lights for South Africa in the Paris rain were little more than damp squibs.

6 – Siya Kolisi – 4
Lost the love of referee Ben O’Keefe early on. His contributions with ball in hand and in the tackle were fine, but he failed in one of his primary tasks which was winning over the man with the whistle. That’s not to say Kolisi could, or should have convinced O’Keefe to call it differently. But one wonders if Kolisi’s charm

7 – Pieter-Steph du Toit – 4
Lacked his usual zip and menace around the fringe. Couldn’t get anywhere near England’s kickers. Was on the wrong side of the law on a few occasions and was perhaps unlucky at times. After consuming George Ford in the final four years ago, he left this one with an empty stomach.

8 – Duane Vermeulen – 5
Some big carries and meaty tackles, but stood firm when asked. Replaced by Kwagga Smith on 51 minutes.

16 – Deon Fourie – 7
A thundering carry to set up RG Snyman’s try. Made an error when he opted to dart round the blindside from a line-out earlier in the game, but exploded out of a maul with 12 minutes left and hammered the English line.

17 – Ox Nche – 10
It was the scrum that clawed South African back into the contest and it was Nche’s introduction that made the difference. There’s not much to add other than salads don’t win scrums – a famous Nche tag-line – and one hopes he never touches a lettuce leaf for the rest of his life.

18 – Vincent Koch – 10
Similarly mighty in the scrum. A monstrous performance that carried the weight of his nation on his broad shoulders. If any South Africans deserved to win this match it was the two replacement props.

19 – RG Snyman – 8
They call him The Viking and he rampaged over the line to score a try like a berserker wielding enormous axes in both hands. Things seemed to get a bit better for the Springboks when he entered the scene and he deserved to come up with a decisive score

20 – Kwagga Smith – 7
Added sharpness around the breakdown. Definitely played a role.

21 – Faf de Klerk – 7
Brought control to a part of the pitch that was lacking it before him.

22 – Handre Pollard – 9
Build that man a statue and replicate it a thousand times. South Africa did not deserve to win this rugby match bit they did because Pollard’s right boot got them over the line. Wasn’t his most fluent or accurate with ball in hand, but his composure, control and rhythm was the difference. And that kick. Oh wow, that kick. They’ll be talking about for generations.

21 – Willie le Roux – 5
Was he an improvement on Willemse? Perhaps. Was still a touch ropey and struggled to get on top of the kick tennis.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

26 Comments
b
ben 426 days ago

Koch & Nche must be the best scrummaging props in the world right now. They won penalties against France and England that made a big difference. All Blacks choice for replacement tight head could be key.

M
M.T. Steyn 427 days ago

These and England's ratings are hilarious 😂😂😂

K
Katz 427 days ago

Harsh ratings but agreed. Nche and Pollard brilliant. Snyman, Faf, Koch and the other replacements in the 2nd half brought much-needed order and energy the boks lacked in the 1st half.

R
Riekert 427 days ago

I think the ratings are fair we here poor tonight, bokke looked tired, 7/1 split for Saturday with Faf, Pollard, Esterhuizen, Moddie, and the normal back three if we want and chance against AB.

B
Bryan 427 days ago

Sssh tough ratings you'd think they lost🤣

M
Martin 427 days ago

Tough ratings, but probably fair. Boks won’t beat the All Blacks playing like this. Ox you beauty!

R
Roy 427 days ago

Seriously? But seriously? England were magnificent but the reason why the different was 1 point was that these SA players stayed in touch and got themselves in a position to win the game. You can't give England players 9 and then SA players 3, it's criminal. It makes no sense. It could be a 6 performance, or a 7 and.the odd player might have had a 5, but to score anything lower than that is just stupid frankly. And I say that as an Eng fan. Eng were great in the conditions but credit where it's due to SA, you ground out a result and made the difference when it really mattered. I'll support you in the final, that's a team of champions

U
Utiku Old Boy 427 days ago

While a bit harsh and also some questionable 10 scores, the Boks were put off their game by an aggressive English game plan played by those who had nothing to lose. Probably won’t see that discomfort in the next game but they might be low on gas by the Final. As an AB supporter, the Final now looms as a statement on two rugby power houses - not just in recent years but over the history of the game. Whoever wins will have bragging rights (for now) but this tournament has delivered quality games, passionate crowds and surprising results - and still ends up with a showdown of two of the best.

A
Ace 427 days ago

And here’s more proof that these ratings are clickbait in its purest form.

N
Neil 427 days ago

Won the game, but the Springbok’s much vaunted loose-forwards were completely owned by England today. The history books will correctly record a Springbok win, but hopefully, there will be an italicized footnote noting that Betty Etzebeth scored 2/10.

Enjoy your win and good luck in the final.

You’ll need it.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 41 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search