Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks player ratings vs Wales | 3rd Test July 2022

Eben Etzebeth of South Africa during the 3rd Castle Lager Incoming Series test match between South Africa and Wales at DHL Stadium on July 16, 2022 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

It was not perfect and it was perhaps more of a slog than most pundits would have expected. However, South Africa wrapped up their three-Test series against Wales with a 30-14 win in Cape Town on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were some promising signs that the Springboks are improving, but it was the famous Bomb Squad that secured this win.

Jan de Koning rates the South African players:

15 Damian Willemse – 8
Great chasing and beating player in the air. Was moved to inside centre after Kolbe left the field. Produced a big hit on defence under pressure deep inside Bok territory. Made great calls on defence and some impressive carries.

Video Spacer

Sam Cane lost for answers as Ian Foster’s job questioned by media after series loss to Ireland | All Blacks press conference

Video Spacer

Sam Cane lost for answers as Ian Foster’s job questioned by media after series loss to Ireland | All Blacks press conference

14 Cheslin Kolbe – 5
Was exposed on defence a few times and left the field with a suspected jaw fracture after just 20 minutes.

13 Lukhanyo Am – 5
Sublime chip for Mapimpi, who just put a foot into touch. He struggled when he moved to the wing and made some errors in judgement.

12 Damian de Allende – 5
Had a couple of powerful carries. However, conceded a few penalties and mistimed as many tackles as he made.

11 Makazole Mapimpi – 5
Chased hard and tackled well. Was penalised for head contact late in first half and lost his contest with George North.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

10 Handre Pollard – 6
His kicking was far more clinical and ran into the gap between two forwards for the opening try. However, made some poor decisions and while better, still not up to his World Cup standard.

9 Jaden Hendrikse – 6
Showed a great turn of pace down the right wing, but unfortunately, the pass to Am was forward. Did the basics well, but conceded a few turnovers.

8 Jasper Wiese – 6
Impressive with the ball in hand, with 11 carries in the first half. Made his tackles and worked hard at the breakdown, but conceded two turnovers. Subbed just before half-time.

7 Pieter-Steph du Toit – 6
His work on defence and wi ball in hand is improving. He clearly enjoys the additional game time at this level. However, he conceded a soft penalty after a warning as well as a couple of turnovers.

ADVERTISEMENT

6 Siyamthanda Kolisi – 7
His best game of the season. Some really powerful carries and crucial try. It was not flawless, but his work rate was impressive.

5 Lodewyk de Jager – 6
Was powerful with ball in hand, making some decent metres with a couple of his runs. Did his work in the set pieces and slipped just one tackle.

Related

4 Eben Etzebeth – 8
Showed great endeavour and had plenty of carries. Showed good turn of pace and made all his tackles. Some great pressure at the breakdown and a crucial charge down early in the second half when Wales looked to be having the momentum.

3 Frans Malherbe – 6
Unfortunately his work rate outside of the set pieces – where he was impressive – remains a concern.

2 Mbongeni Mbonambi – 6
Great in the set pieces and good value for his try. Didn’t get many metres for his five carries, but made all his tackles.

1 Trevor Nyakane – 6
Powerful scrumming – again showed he is comfortable on both the tighthead and (in this case) loosehead side. However, he also penalised at a couple of scrums. His work rate outside the set pieces also still a concerns.

Replacements:

16 Malcolm Marx – 7
Brought the power game, with some very impressive carries – especially in the final 10 minutes. Also won a crucial turnover penalty.

17 Steven Kitshoff – 5
Not his usual self, making no impact with ball in hand. Another player who needs to improve his work rate.

18 Vincent Koch – 6
Some impressive carrying and a high work rate, with his only downside the two missed tackles.

19 Franco Mostert – 5
Brought some energy, but a penalty at a maul late in the second half and a missed the let-downs.

20 Kwagga Smith – 9
His first action was winning a turnover inside his own 22 and then another crucial turnover close to his line n the final 10 minutes. Plenty of energy and made good ground with ball in hand. Add in his seven tackles and he was the most productive player for the Boks.

21 Elrigh Louw – NA
Not enough time to be rated.

22 Francois de Klerk – 6
Did the basics well and was a menace on defence.

23 Willie le Roux – 7
Solid at the back and brought some much-needed energy on attack. His vision added a real threat to the Bok attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
S
Shaune 889 days ago

Wiese made 11 caries in 35 minutes before taken off injured. Clearly you never watched the game. You also don’t concede a turnover you make one mate. Poor article

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

202 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search