Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks player ratings vs Wallabies | 1st Test Rugby Championship

South African players gather after their defeat to Australia after the Rugby Championship match between Australia and South Africa at Adelaide Oval on August 27, 2022, in Adelaide. (Photo by BRENTON EDWARDS/AFP via Getty Images)

South Africa continued their dramatic slide in the Rugby Championship, as they lost 17-25 to a motivated Australia in Adelaide on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The margin flatters the Springboks, who scored both the consolation tries in the last 15 minutes, the second in the 80th minute – when the game was well-and-truly over as a contest.

Out-thought and outplayed by their hosts the visitors trailed 3-25 going into the final quarter.

The Boks got off to a horror start, conceding a try in the first minute and then going 0-10 down minutes later.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

From there on it was all downhill in what must rank as the worst performance after winning the 2019 World Cup.

15 Damian Willemse – 6
He had a kick charged down as a result of sloppy execution and conceded another turnover, when he lost the ball in contact. However, he made a number of promising runs, which yielded 60 metres.

14 Warrick Gelant – 4
No value (metres) from his three carries, with a wild pass that conceded possession and other turnovers, meant his contribution was in the negative.

13 Lukhanyo Am – 8
His reading of the game and tactical appreciation is on another level. He rescued Boks on more than one occasion and was South Africa’s most productive player.

ADVERTISEMENT

12 Damian de Allende – 5
Massive early tackle miss and turned over the ball on occasion. Got into the game in the final quarter and was good value in the late rally.

11 Makazole Mapimpi – 5
His finishing is not at his usual standards and had limited success with the ball in hand. Didn’t deal well with Wallaby high bombs. Also kicked away possession on attack.

10 Handre Pollard – 4
His first kick at goal was a real shocker and missed the second one as well. his game management also not the best, missed a tackle for Koroibete’s try and conceded a turnover.

9 Faf de Klerk – 4
Got yellow carded for poor execution of an attempt to smack Nic White’s arm and hitting his face. However, he generally looked out of sorts and is in poor form.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

8 Duane Vermeulen – 6
Won a crucial turnover early in first half when Australia had all the momentum and generally a much-improved performance – looking like he is regaining some form.

7 Pieter-Steph du Toit – 5
Lots of energy, but execution often letting him down – conceding a couple of turnovers. Two decent carries and made most of his tackles.

6 Siy Kolisi – 7
Won a crucial turnover in the first half and kept working hard – with a handful of decent carries and his tackle count into double digits. Won a turnover that resulted in the consolation try for the Boks.

5 Lood de Jager – 6
Great work rate and stealing a couple of line-outs. His tackle count was also into double digits and he had some strong carries, although he conceded a couple of turnovers

4 Eben Etzebeth – 5
Got very little reward for his half-a-dozen carries, with his best work on defence.

3 Frans Malherbe – 5
Offered nothing outside of the scrums – with one carry and four tackles,.

2 Joseph Dweba – 5
His line-out throws remain a major concern and only made a handful of tackles.

1 Ox Nche – 5
Much-improve scrum showing and a hand full of tackles, but overall his work rate remains a concern.

REPLACEMENTS:

16 Malcolm Marx – 6
Provided energy and physicality, with some strong carries. Missed one tackle and was flawless in the line-outs.

17 Steven Kitshoff – 6
Carried well and looked full of energy, but missed a couple of tackles.

18 Vincent Koch – 5
Had a couple of decent carries and made all his tackles. Did not get the scrum dominance that was expected.

Related

19 Franco Mostert – 4
Conceded silly penalty soon after coming on and failed to make an impact.

20 Kwagga Smith – 7
Tried to inject himself into the game, with some promising moments – including some strong carries and two consolation tries.

21 Jaden Hendrikse – 6
Did the basics well and cleared quickly, helping te Bok backs get some front foot ball.

22 Elton Jantjies – 6
His first contribution was conceding a penalty, but settled to create some momentum with good game management.

23 Francois Steyn – 5
Looked well short of a gallop and out of shape. Also lost the ball in contact close to the Wallaby line, although there was one decent run.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 24 minutes ago
Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

“A succession of recent ex-players going straight back into the game as coaches in their early 40’s would prob be enough to kill it stone-dead. Innovation would die a death.”

Would it? I do think one of the major differences between rugby and most other sports - which we’ve been overlooking - is the degree to which players are expected to lead team meetings & analysis sessions and the like. Someone like Owen Farrell has basically been an assistant coach already for ten years - and he’s been so under a variety of different head coaches with different expectations and playing styles.


“The most interesting ppl I have met in the game have all coached well into their sixties and they value the time and opportunity they have had to reflect and therefore innovate in the game. That’s based on their ability to compare and contrast between multiple eras.”

I don’t doubt that that’s true. But having interesting insights doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll be the best able to inspire a team, or the best at managing the backroom staff.


“Wayne Smith winning the WWC in his mid sixties three years ago prob means nothing to you but it meant a lot to him. It took him back to the roots of is own coaching journey.”

I don’t doubt that! But I don’t think coaches should be hired on the basis that it means a lot to them.


“The likes of Carlo Ancelotti and Wayne Bennett and Andy Reid all have a tale to tell. You should open your ears and listen to it!”

I agree! Never have I ever suggested otherwise!

176 Go to comments
J
JW 4 hours ago
French bid to poach 109kg 17-year-old dual-code Aussie prospect Heinz Lemoto

Yes that’s what WR needs to look at. Football had the same problem with european powerhouses getting all the latin talent then you’re gaurenteed to get the odd late bloomer (21/22 etc, all the best footballers can play for the country much younger to get locked) star changing his allegiance.


They used youth rep selection for locking national elifibilty at one point etc. Then later only counted residency after the age of 18 (make clubs/nations like in this case wait even longer).


That’s what I’m talking about, not changing allegiance in rugby (were it can only be captured by the senior side), where it is still the senior side. Oh yeah, good point about CJ, so in most cases we probably want kids to be able to switch allegiance, were say someone like Lemoto could rep Tonga (if he wasn’t so good) but still play for Australia’s seniors, while in someone like Kite’s (the last aussie kid to go to France) case he’ll be French qualified via 5 years residency at the age of 21, so France to lock him up before Aussie even get a chance to select him. But if we use footballs regulations, who I’m suggesting WR need to get their a into g replicating, he would only start his 5 years once he turns 18 or whatever, meaning 23 yo is as soon as anyone can switch, and when if they’re good enough teams like NZ and Aus can select them (France don’t give a f, they select anybody just to lock them).

9 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: 'Can we have our Champions Cup back, please?' Mick Cleary: 'Can we have our Champions Cup back, please?'
Search