Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks 'quite happy' with refereeing in aftermath of Rassie rant

Ben O'Keefe /PA

Assistant coach Deon Davids described the Springboks as being “happy” with how the second test was controlled by referee Ben O’Keefe and his team of officials.

ADVERTISEMENT

This comment came days after director of rugby Rassie Erasmus issued a 62-minute video identifying areas where the hosts were dissatisfied with Nic Berry’s display during the series opener.

Erasmus went on to criticise World Rugby’s approach and the timeliness with which his team received responses to their post-match officiating queries.

Video Spacer

Warren Gatland has said emotion will play a key role in the third Lions test.

Video Spacer

Warren Gatland has said emotion will play a key role in the third Lions test.

When questioned South Africa’s forwards coach declined to comment on whether his boss’s headline-grabbing reaction was behind this shift.

“I can’t comment on whether it was a direct result,” he said.

“All I can say is that we are quite happy with the way in which certain areas of the game that we highlighted were refereed this week.

“There was good communication between the referee and the players and the referee and the captains throughout the game.

“And at the end of the game we were able to express ourselves in the way we want to.

“Nothing has changed in my view; the things listed (in the video) referred to incidents in that specific game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was also always a policy of looking at incidents fairly to give us a complete understanding of where we can improve.

“We still have the same outlook in terms of being critical about our game and seeing how we can perform and execute better onfield and how we can improve our communication with the referee and assistants during the game.

“Whatever happens in a game there is a thorough process that goes with that and that is the same this week as last.

“Whatever calls have been made in this game will be dealt with in the right spirit to get the right outcome.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Davids also confirmed that the Springboks have no complaints with the post-match citing process from which only Lions replacement prop Kyle Sinckler is required to answer a charge.

“We are quite satisfied with the process that has been followed,” he said.

“There was good interaction with the coaching staff according to the processes of World Rugby and whatever decision they make we will abide with.”

de Jager Springboks
(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

South Africa’s Sale Sharks lock Lood de Jager, who arrived on the field in the second half, put the second test’s high levels of physical confrontation down to what was at stake.

“I would say there was a little bit more than the usual amount of niggle due to the magnitude of the game,” he said.

“The players are playing for their countries and are very proud. It was a massive game for them as if they won that game they won the series and for us it was even bigger as if we lost we were done.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

119 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search