Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks to confirm on Friday they are boycotting the Rugby Championship - reports

(Photo by Steve Haag/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

SA Rugby are remaining tightlipped on whether or not the Springboks will play in next month’s Rugby Championship in Australia following a New Zeland Herald report claiming they will be pulling out and boycotting the event.    

ADVERTISEMENT

A statement from SA Rugby read: “An SA Rugby spokesperson said that speculation in the media that the Springboks were to be withdrawn from the Rugby Championship had been noted. 

“However, it would make no comment on the reports until SANZAAR had updated all stakeholders through official channels, which was expected to be on Friday.”

Video Spacer

The Aotearoa Rugby Pod nominates its performance of the week

Video Spacer

The Aotearoa Rugby Pod nominates its performance of the week

Fears that the world champions Springboks would not be defending their Rugby Championship title accelerated last weekend when SA Rugby said they would be taking their time to consider all the protocols involved in travelling to the tournament where they are supposed to face Argentina in Brisbane on November 7. 

That concern deepened when it emerged on Tuesday that SANZAAR have given SA Rugby a 48-hour ultimatum to decide for definite whether or not they would participate in the six-round tournament that will run until early December. 

There is anxiety in South African rugby circles about the disadvantage the Springboks would face at the tournament. While players in New Zealand and Australia were back in action by June and July respectively, the restart has taken much longer to happen in South Africa.

There have been only three rounds of matches so far, two weekends with the Super Rugby sides and the other as part of a Springboks trial. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The SA Rugby statement on Tuesday following the 48-hour deadline read: “SANZAAR announced overnight that following a chief executives’ teleconference call on Tuesday, October 13, the SANZAAR member unions have agreed to provide SA Rugby with an additional 48 hours to finalise its internal stakeholder discussions on participation. 

“This will now delay the scheduled departure of the Springboks from South Africa to Australia. SANZAAR said it would provide an update on the resolution of these discussions and a timetable for the Springboks participation in The Rugby Championship when available in the coming days.”

The South African refusal to take part will cost each of the four nations millions of dollars in lost broadcast revenue. SANZAAR had reportedly even revised the original match schedule to allow the Springboks players to get in more club games at home before departure but even that hasn’t pacified them.

The South Africans instead officially notified SANZAAR of their decision on Thursday not to take part and an official announcement is expected on Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 1 day ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Don’t tell my wife!' – Slade’s cheeky take on Exeter’s big win 'Don’t tell my wife!' – Slade’s cheeky take on Exeter’s big win
Search