Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks expected to 'revert to type' against All Blacks

South Africa Director of Rugby Rassie Erasmus looks on during the pre match warm up ahead of the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between South Africa and Ireland at Stade de France on September 23, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Craig Mercer/MB Media/Getty Images)

A new era of Springbok rugby is upon us, one with a more ambitious style of play with the ball in hand, however, when push comes to shove, it’s expected pragmatism will still reign supreme for the world champs.

ADVERTISEMENT

A proven world-beating recipe of set-piece dominance and aggressive line speed has seen the South Africans crowned back-to-back world champions, but with this new World Cup cycle has come new assistants under charismatic head coach Rassie Erasmus.

Notably, former All Black Tony Brown has assumed the reigns as attack coach, lending a more liberal voice to what is one of rugby’s more conservative, territory-based attacking philosophies.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

That hasn’t gone unnoticed by Kiwi analysts, including former Stormers and Chiefs assistant coach Paul Feeney, who offered his thoughts on how the Springboks might look to play against the All Blacks.

“I’ve seen that South Africa’s keen to attack, I still question under the pump whether they’ll revert to type,” he told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

“I know Rassie’s a very smart man and he’s just going to bring it in slowly, so, over the next three years. Once they hit the World Cup they’ll be up and running and good to go because he obviously realises that they’ve got to do a little bit more than they have to win the last two World Cups.

“Game one against Australia, I saw the intent to move the ball in places they wouldn’t previously; around halfway for example. At least when they see they’ve got a five-on-three just playing heads-up football and calling for the ball out the back of the pod and looking to have a bit of a crack, whereas previously they’d just look to kick for territory and play their territory/pressure game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So there were two or three instances I saw they are looking to use the ball where possible. They’d do it obviously after they win scrum penalties or when they dominate a set-piece.”

Related

While the Tests in Australia offered the defending world champs one challenge, hosting the All Blacks in Johannesburg offers something very different.

“I think at Ellis Park, at altitude, with the team that Rassie can put on the park, they’ll just look to bash the All Blacks,” Feeney added.

“They’re going to first and foremost revert back to their set-piece, their pressure game with territory and their harsh line speed which the All Blacks have always struggled to play against.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think we’ll definitely see that and if they get one or two opportunities, if the All Blacks get a bit tight defensively defending the big boys, trying to get some doubles, I’m sure under Tony Brown the Springboks will be looking for a few opportunities to play where possible.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
T
Terry24 115 days ago

The first Irish match at Loftus was the template: for what South Africa won't do.

The expansive game that they employed with PSDT and Kolisi often steaming down the tramlines put Ireland majorly on the back foot initially. But at altititude SAs big players were goosed by half time. At 65mins the match was only 13-8 and SA were extremely vulnerable.

As a result of these lessons and lessons since: SA will keep it tight and tough, contestable kicks, talking opportunities as they arrive but giving NZ nothing and no room to breathe. It wont be unlike the RWC final except with SA less fatigued, far more dominant and being more expansive when its on.

D
DA 113 days ago

what a load of rubbish you always seem to put out there about the Bok big players being goosed. The irish forwards were just as big and I think a few kilos heavier than the Boks. Altitude is a myth. Glasgow and Munster both beat the Bulls in Pretoria. Most of the Bok players live at the coast. Preparation by team doctors is what gets players through. I suppose next time the Boks play in mud and wet conditions you are going to say the playing fields were levelled and the Boks were goosed

S
SK 115 days ago

South Africa have not changed that much, they are just using the front foot ball they generate alot better and have just worked on their decision making, option taking, attacking shape with more players running in the trams, passing more, building more rucks and also constantly trying to exploit counterattacking opportunities. Oh wait that is a lot of change.

r
rs 115 days ago

The Boks will surprise everyone and come out with all guns blazing. Run, run and run. If wheels come off then bomb squad will just subdue. Going to be a cracker.

F
Flankly 115 days ago

It's not a matter of "reverting to type". They have not changed their type, just added a better offloading game to what they were doing.


They will not over-emphasize that offloading game early in the match, and they will generally steer away from some of the more speculative offloads that we have seen to date. The ABs are good at punishing errors and loose ball in open play.


But the Bok game will of course be rooted in physicality, aggressive defense, and abrasive forward play. That's not reverting to type. It's just doing what they always do.

R
RugCs 115 days ago

I wonder who these people are that write these editorials, it’s like they do not watch the game or even understand the game.


I’m just going to book mark Nic Bishop’s bio so that when I open the link all I see is quality. I’m tired of the rugbypass trolls masquerading as writers and the worthless opinion writers.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search