Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks will rue benching the man who single-handedly dismantled the All Blacks

Malcolm Marx. (Original photo by Dirk Kotze/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

In the wake of the Springboks’ 26-10 win over the All Blacks at Mbombela Stadium – their largest over the New Zealand outfit since 1928 – much has been made of how comprehensively the home side outplayed the down-on-their-luck visitors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dig a little deeper, however, and it’s apparent that for the first time in an All Blacks match this year, the score didn’t really reflect the contest.

Make no mistake – this is an All Blacks side lacking structure, strategy and confidence – but there’s good reason to believe that this weekend’s fixture at Ellis Park might not finish in the Springboks’ favour.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

There isn’t a player in New Zealand – or perhaps the world – that could reignite the All Blacks’ faltering attack right now. Whatever team Ian Foster rolls out for the fixture, most changes in personnel are likely to have little to no impact on how well the team performs in open play in Johannesburg.

There is, however, a personnel change on South Africa’s side of the ledger that could lead to a significant change in fortunes.

After a world-class performance in Mbombela in what was his 50th Test, the indomitable Malcolm Marx has been relegated back to the bench for this weekend’s rematch.

After staking a claim as one of the top hookers in the game throughout the formative stages of his Test career, Marx found himself redeployed at the final stages of the 2019 Rugby World Cup as a bench specialist for the Springboks.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a role that Marx has taken well to and the one-two punch that South Africa have been able to call upon between him and Bongi Mbonambi in the crucial hooker position will go down in history as one of the best the game has ever seen.

Marx and Mbonambi are two very different players with vastly different skill sets, however, and Marx’s ability over the ball at the tackle was on full display in Mbombela.

On four occasions, Marx was able to force turnovers at the breakdown. In two instances, the Springboks were awarded penalties while the other occasions simply resulted in a change of possession.

Related

“That’s one of the keys to the Test match, our inability to get enough momentum going,” said All Blacks captain Sam Cane following the defeat.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Malcolm Marx is particularly [good] getting over the ball. Normally it comes down to the ball carrier winning the collision and then snapping the ball back, long placement, but particularly the cleaners were almost half a second off and he was winning that race. Once he gets in a strong position over that ball, he’s probably one of the toughest in the world to move.”

While the All Blacks have looked devoid of any incisive attacking structure over the better part of the last year, they have managed to hold onto possession long enough to create half opportunities for their more dangerous ball players. The likes of Rieko Ioane, Sevu Reece, Will Jordan, Beauden Barrett and Ardie Savea have all profited from taking advantage of the smallest of opportunities to create scoring chances for their side. It’s not an ideal tactic, but it’s one that does pay dividends simply thanks to the individual abilities of some of those players.

On Saturday, however, long strings of possession were few and far between for the men in black – and Marx was a key factor in disrupting New Zealand ball, even when he wasn’t directly producing turnovers or penalties.

The Springboks are a side that play best from in front, when they can apply scoreboard pressure, force errors and encourage their opposition to overplay their hand, and Malcolm Marx gave them the perfect platform to work from last weekend.

This Saturday, Joseph Dweba will step into the No 2 jersey after Mbonambi was initially named in the role but succumbed to injury during the week. Marx will provide his breakdown work off the bench but undoubtedly in a smaller capacity than the 55 minutes he managed at Mbombela.

It’s a curious move from Jacques Nienaber, shifting Marx back to the reserves. Some will suggest that Marx’s stint in the No 2 jersey was a way of rewarding him for hitting the 50-cap mark but there’s little room for sentiment in Test rugby. If Nienaber had already identified that the All Blacks lacked security at the breakdown and elevated Marx on that basis, it paid off in a big way. Why, then, would he drop the turnover tyro to the bench after such a strong showing?

Marx may have reinvented himself as a bench specialist in recent years but past preconceptions that his best work comes when the opposition are tired and worn down should not dictate his place in the 23 when he’s just performed a one-man destruction derby on the All Blacks’ possession stats.

It’s a decision that could come back to haunt a Springboks side that – like their opposition – couldn’t really construct a try to save themselves.

Both of South Africa’s scores came off the back of All Blacks errors, with the first a product of Beauden Barrett coughing up a high ball and the second thanks to a drop from Shannon Frizell just outside his 22. The All Blacks’ one try came from similarly freakish circumstances – a Caleb Clarke tackle bust and linebreak with Frizell following up to dot down from the breakdown.

Related

Neither team was actually able to put together the phases and put enough pressure on their opposition to break through the defensive line. For all the talk of the Springboks’ destructive ball-carriers, they managed just 88 metres with ball in hand – only six more than the All Blacks. The Springboks didn’t struggle to get into the All Blacks’ 22, but they did struggle to convert that territory into points, and it’s really down to their work at the breakdown and at scrum time that they were able to build some ascendency and put scoreboard pressure on NZ.

In that vein, there are two changes that the All Blacks could make for this weekend that would give them a better chance at victory, and that’s in the front row. Neither George Bower nor Angus Ta’avao are known for their scrummaging ability and three penalties at the set-piece on Saturday affirmed that they were perhaps not the best men to suit up against the Springboks.

Once Ethan de Groot and Tyrel Lomax entered the fray in the second half, the scrum shored up considerably and after both players were omitted from the July squad, they may well have earned themselves starting roles this weekend. If Foster really wants to gain parity, however, he’ll throw uncapped 22-year-old Fletcher Newell into the deep end on the tighthead side of the scrum and probably also afford loosehead Aidan Ross a spot in the 23 to support De Groot and Lomax.

With greater consistency at scrum time and Malcolm Marx off the pitch, the All Blacks would have been able to almost half their penalty count from the first Test, and seriously limited the Springboks’ ability to tick over the scoreboard and exert pressure.

It might be far too much to ask for the All Blacks’ attack to suddenly click at Ellis Park on Saturday evening but if last weekend’s fixture is anything to go by, they actually don’t need their attack to click to beat the Springboks. The home team will rightfully go into the match as favourites – especially with the braying South African fans giving the All Blacks hell from the stands – but the Springboks aren’t a side that are 16 points better than their opposition; the most recent result was an anomaly, not a yardstick for where the two teams sit.

Remember it was only last month that the Springboks struggled to put away a Welsh side that had somewhat embarrassingly lost their prior match, ending Italy’s run of 36 defeats in the Six Nations – a Welsh side that was also categorically thumped by 38 points in their more recent match with the All Blacks last October.

The Springboks have a slew of world-class players at their disposal and a game plan that suits their strengths but if the All Blacks can tighten up their game in the opening 20 minutes – which starts by holding onto the ball and not coughing up possession at the breakdown and the scrum – they’ll be able to give the home side a run for their money.

A win at Ellis Park likely won’t change coach Foster’s fate – and it won’t necessarily indicate that the All Blacks have made any massive gains since last weekend’s almost-historic defeat – but with the X-factor and talent at their disposal, a lucky bounce of the ball could be enough to swing the result in their favour.

It might be too much to ask for the All Blacks to turn their season around completely against the Springboks on Saturday and rebirth themselves as a fresh new side with the structure and poise to beat the best in the business, but a win certainly isn’t out of the question. Based on last weekend’s clash, it should not even come as a surprise.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

20 Comments
G
GrahamVF 859 days ago

Tom you were right. But it has underlined a bigger problem. When the top four or five sides have to face each other two weeks in a row intensity levels cannot be constant. The bio rythms and physiological reasons for energy levels cannot stay the same week after week. There are answers and the top coaches will have to find them soon or this is going to be the norm for top teams. A big win followed by a let down. Starting with England in the WC track the pattern.

B
Bryan 860 days ago

Well that all worked out for the best. MM should've been there from the kick-off.

G
Geoff 862 days ago

If the writer is lamenting that the Boks didn't score their tries from setpiece play, he will again be in for disappointment. Defence is that good that very few test tries arise this way today. The AB's execution was poor because of playing players out of position, selections and an Inability to break the Bok defence and the Boks feasted on it. They were deserving of a bigger than 16 point winning. margin!

B
Bryan 863 days ago

There will be fewer errors from the ABs this week and benching Marx will give them an opportunity to build some scoreboard pressure of their own.
While it takes a whole team effort, Marx was responsible for at least half of the AB turnovers and penalties last week.
Bringing him on later, when lungs have emptied of the thin air, will certainly have a big impact but if the ABs have the better of the scoreboard, it might be too late.
Mo'unga having been given the starting role, will use his savvy kicking game to obtain better field position than last week (we saw the difference there when he came on) and we all know the ABs will keep the score ticking over if you let them play in your half.
The outcome of this match is by no means a fait accompli and I have $10 on the ABs at 13+ because when they're down, history has shown us, it's not for long. When they click and the bounce-back comes, so will the tries flow, in floods.

S
Silk 863 days ago

The writer of this article has not done his homework. NZ is renowned for speeding up the play and throwing the ball around in the last 20 minutes at specifically Ellis Park. The All Blacks have had several famous last 20 min comebacks vs the Springboks at Ellis Park.
How do you counter that? Win the breakdown in the last quarter = Marx.
I think it is a masterstroke by Nienaber.
Thor is starting at 8 and he is just as good at the breakdown.
I must have watched a different test match to this writer last Saturday. The Springboks demolished the All Blacks and the Boks should have won by 40+
The All Blacks will be better at Ellis Park, but so will the Springboks. This time around the Boks will use their opportunities better.
Boks by 20+ at Ellis Park.

D
Danie 863 days ago

One man does not win a rugby test match, especially between SA and NZ. MM made a big impact and pretty much always does, whether he starts or comes off the bench. NZ has been out of sorts this season however even when they were on form in previous seasons and came under pressure they made mistakes that affected their continuity. The difference being that when they are on form they find ways to up the tempo and squeeze out a win. The Bokke put the AB's under huge defensive pressure on Saturday (across all 15 men not just MM). the AB's made mistakes but because they are not on form they were unable to come back from it. The Bok tries came from AB errors but in both cases the Bokke where on attack and the errors came from good SA pressure and the aerial battle. The Bokke deserve the scoreline they got as they slowly choked the AB's out of the match. Starting MM this Saturday would be a mistake as SA has an inexperienced player coming in for Mbonambi. If MM starts and Dweba comes on later and struggles to the extent that he is a liability MM cannot come back on to replace him whereas if Dweba starts Nienaber has that option available at any time during the match. As for the Wales tests, I think SA was lucky to win the first test (bounce of the ball and some favourable ref calls) but that was their first test of the year and they were rusty. The 2nd test was always a gamble and Nienaber used it to blood some new players. SA lost that match in the dying seconds. The 3rd test with a '1st choice' Bok team and some of the cob webs gone, Wales barely threatened the Boks. I agree though that SA did not have anything on attack on Saturday other than the high ball and playing off NZ errors created by Bok pressure. That's a concern that needs to be addressed. Having said all that, the AB's are a class side going through a bit of a slump and have hugely talented players. A victory over them is never a sure thing and I don't think it would surprise anyone if they manage a win on Saturday. No need to grasp at straws to find silly reasons like MM not starting as a reason why the AB's might win.

G
Greg 863 days ago

I think this article has missed a key point! I feel the reason Nienaber is happy to put MM back on the bench/bomb squad is because of Thor's return to the starting 15. Everyone forgets that Thor's turnover at the breakdown stats might actually exceed MM's! Eighty minutes of Thor (suspect Wiese will come on in the last 20/30min perhaps) and later MM in the last 20/30 when the AB's are tired and struggling to breathe will cause complete & utter mayhem within the AB breakdown and nullify all attack!

s
spady 863 days ago

You are in for a big shock. You have missed one critical element. Springbok's game management determines the selection.. boks dont have starting 15, they have playing 23.

G
Graham 864 days ago

Could not agree more, have been saying that scoreboard pressure in the last test was what won the Boks that game with such a margin.
From most pundits the argument is that Marx is colossal in the latter part of the game and sure its true, if you want to grind out a win after trailing, for most the match (just look at the wales series as the perfect example). I would prefer getting ahead early and putting the pressure on the opposition to come back. Many of the Bok games are way too close for comfort and its because teams gain confidence when leading at half time or at least being close and then having belief that they can win in the 2nd half. Dont allow teams that bit of a sniff, kill them off early, apply pressure on defence as well as the scoreboard...make it feel like its a mountain to climb just to get close,kill the confidence, force them to play and make mistakes and capitalize on those errors that will come.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 33 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search