Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Stable Sharks can end drought - Super Rugby 2019 Preview

Settled. Stable. Successful. Those words sum up the Sharks to a tee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of all the South African franchises they have the most settled squad.

It is not meant as an insult to the players, but the departure of the likes of Garth April, Tristan Blewett, Michael Claassens (retired), Keegan Daniel (retired), Johan Deysel, Ross Geldenhuys, Stephan Lewies and Franco Marais will hardly register on the Richter scale.

The most significant loss, that of Lewies, has been offset by the signing of talented youngster Ruben van Heerden from the Bulls.

Throughout the squad they have players that have been in the system for a few years – plenty of experience and a good spread of youthful exuberance.

It is in the pack where they have the most depth.

There is a front row with players like Thomas du Toit, Coenie Oosthuizen, Tendai Mtawarira and Armand van der Merwe, backed by a second row that can draw on Hyron Andrews, Ruan Botha, Ruben van Heerden and Tyler Paul.

The back row can call on Paul (where he played most in 2018), Jacques Vermeulen, Dan du Preez, Jean-Luc du Preez and Philip van der Walt.

In the backline they have Springbok quality in Louis Schreuder (as captain), Robert du Preez, Lukhanyo Am, André Esterhuizen, Makazole Mapimpi and Sibusiso Nkosi.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is thus not surprising they believe they can finally end nearly three decades of Super Rugby drought – which has seen them lose in five finals (including 1994 Super 10 Final against Queensland), losing semifinalists four times and reaching the preliminary play-offs on three other occasions.

The last two years – in Super Rugby and Currie Cup – the Sharks reached the play-off stages every time.

They finally kicked on in the Currie Cup Final last year, beating Western Province at Newlands.

They are confident they can carry that form into Super Rugby in 2019.

And they know how to beat New Zealand teams.

ADVERTISEMENT

They beat the Chiefs, Highlanders and Blues (in Auckland). They lost to the Hurricanes (37-38 in Napier) and the Crusaders (in the quarterfinal in Christchurch).

The cherry on top for the Sharks is the acquisition of David Williams as the attack coach – a man who had considerable success with Bath and London Irish in England, as well as the Southern Kings and Cheetahs.

2019 Predictions

South African Conference Placing: First
Player of the Year: Armand van der Merwe
Rookie of the Year: Ruben van Heerden
Super Rugby Placing: Runners-up

Squad Movements

In: Ruben van Heerden (from the Bulls)

Out: Garth April (to Shining Arcs & Bulls), Tristan Blewett (New Orleans Gold), Michael Claassens (retired), Keegan Daniel (retired), Johan Deysel (Colomiers), Ross Geldenhuys (Bay of Plenty), Stephan Lewies (Lions), Franco Marais (Gloucester).

History

Best finish: Runners-up in 1994, 1996, 2001, 2007, 2012

Worst finish: Twelfth in 2000 and 2005

Squad (provisional): Thomas du Toit, Mzamo Majola, John-Hubert Meyer, Coenie Oosthuizen, Tendai Mtawarira, Armand van der Merwe, Mahlatse Ralepelle, Hyron Andrews, Ruan Botha, Jean Droste, Gideon Koegelenberg, Ruben van Heerden, Tyler Paul, Jacques Vermeulen, Wian Vosloo, Dan du Preez, Jean-Luc du Preez, Philip van der Walt, Louis Schreuder (captain), Cameron Wright, Curwin Bosch, Robert du Preez, Lukhanyo Am, André Esterhuizen, Marius Louw, Jeremy Ward, Makazole Mapimpi, Lwazi Mvovo, Sibusiso Nkosi, Kobus van Wyk, Leolin Zas, Rhyno Smith, Courtney Winnaar.

By Jan de Koning @rugby365

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Kumamoto:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search