Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Star players back on deck for Wallabies as Springboks loom

(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

A confident Andrew Kellaway admits he’ll be envious of the punters drinking beers on the Adelaide Oval hill on Saturday but says he’s ready to put on a show for them.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies back injured his hamstring seven weeks ago, costing him a start in the hotly-contested No 15 jersey in the recent series against England.

Jordan Petaia – filling the role of injured fullback Tom Banks – lasted just minutes in the position in the second Test against England before being concussed, and has since returned on the wing with Tom Wright preferred at fullback.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Petaia and Wright had days to forget in a record 48-17 mauling from Argentina in their most recent outing, leaving the position up for grabs in the side’s Rugby Championship return to home soil.

It begins in Adelaide on Saturday against world champions South Africa, who have lost their past seven Tests in Australia in a drought dating back to 2013.

Kellaway was coy about his positional movements, saying he’s been training at the Wallabies’ Gold Coast base as a winger and fullback, but made it clear he’s ready to roll.

“Yeah [the timing of the injury] was a tough pill to swallow; I was looking forward to playing fullback and it doesn’t come by often in this team with the depth we have there now,” he told reporters on Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was a slow process, at least it felt like that for me, but I ripped into it and here we are hopefully – touch wood – no complications. I’m ready to go and if I get the call-up, how good.

“I’m pumped. Adelaide Oval, what a place; would love to be on the hill having a beer … (it’s) one of the great cricket venues.”

Prop Allan Alaalatoa will also return after missing the last Test for personal reasons.

Related

He said there had been “an edge” to Australia’s training this week after the poor showing in Argentina that came a week after an impressive first-up win there.

“The boys have been pretty gutted after that last game,” he said. “There were some tough conversations yesterday in review and it’s all for us to get better this weekend. We had a sour taste in our mouth.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Alaalatoa said the set piece battle remained a focal point of the Springboks’ plan.

“All the games that I’ve been part of (against South Africa), we say the forward pack has to take it to them,” he said.

“It’s something they’ll try and go to a lot on Saturday.”

– Murray Wenzel

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh Why Freddy Douglas has played for Scotland before Edinburgh
Search