Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

State of Play: Women’s Rugby in New Zealand in 2024

DUNEDIN, NEW ZEALAND - OCTOBER 28: Renee Holmes of New Zealand looks on during the WXV1 match between New Zealand Black Ferns and Wales at Forsyth Barr Stadium on October 28, 2023 in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

It didn’t take long for a big announcement to come in the world of women’s rugby this year. A British & Irish Lions (Lionesses?) women’s side will tour New Zealand in 2027, although the reaction to the news down in these parts has been somewhat mixed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Which feels in line with the general reaction overall, given that it’s hard to see a Lions side being anything other than England playing in a different uniform right now. But while that’s a challenge for Scotland, Wales and Ireland to face, there’s also the ones in the upcoming host country that need to be addressed too.

The Black Ferns, Super Rugby Aupiki and women’s rugby in general in New Zealand is in a unique space right now. A lot of the future is looking very bright, however there are going to be some serious obstacles to overcome in the next few years as well.

Someone who knows that acutely is NZ Rugby’s head of women’s rugby, Claire Beard.

“We do need a better feeder system,” Beard admits, bringing up the most obvious issue hindering development at a high-performance level. Currently there are 3,800 registered senior women’s players, a figure that can only sustain four Aupiki sides.

“We need more senior women’s rugby players, we need more female coaches and referees, we need more female volunteers, we need more diversity on our boards.”

The real clash of ideologies with a Lions tour is that is, fundamentally, at odds with the direction NZR is taking. Last year saw the release of their ground-breaking women and girls strategy, the main focus of which is to increase the amount of female players to 50,000 over the next decade.

“We are very confident of that target,” says Beard.

“We’ve already seen registrations double what they were four years ago, so that momentum that we generated from the World Cup…we have an opportunity to think differently about the women’s game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We can’t offer rugby the same way it’s offered to boys, so it’s made us think about the constraints and environments we’re delivering it in – because women are different. That could open up a conversation about where we take the game as a whole in the future.”

While a Lions tour certainly wouldn’t hurt promoting the women’s game here, the more pressing concern is getting people interested in the third season of Aupiki. Professionalism is ever so slightly shifting women’s rugby into being its own unique entity, drawing a new generation of fans. That’s something Beard wants to maintain.

“I think that you still have to be incredibly intentional about change,” says Beard.

“People have choices around the consumption of anything, any leisure activity and any content activity is a choice. So, the opportunity to ensure that what we’re doing and how we’re doing it, we can’t just make it available and install it and think, yeah, the job’s done.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s not going to be easy. The irony is that the same engagement challenges that face women’s rugby in its new era have been eating away at the interest in the men’s game for quite a while now – so it’s not as straightforward as simply repackaging rugby with eye-catching scrunchies and Ruby Tui.

New Zealand is a shifting society, with the full integration of women into one of the longest-standing bastions of heteronormative patriarchy sometimes feeling like an inevitable assimilation rather than bold new creation.

“I think the big thing is making sure we are learning,” Beard said.

“When stuff isn’t working, we stop it. And when we try things, we’re really intentional about trying things. We’ve been to a lot of venues over the last two years. We’ve introduced fans a lot of new formats and a lot of new brands…so I think simplifying the product offering for the fan is definitely a big learning.”

One obvious example of how men’s and women’s rugby is still very much tied at the hip in New Zealand was the recent WXV 1 series, played over three weeks in October/November 2023. It was at the same time the men’s Rugby World Cup, meaning that already stretched sports media resource to get the tournament’s very existence in front of fans wasn’t even in the country at the time.

Not that the situation was anyone’s fault, more an unfortunate reality of timings. There was no other time to hold WXV 1 to fit in with the way that the northern and southern hemisphere seasons work – meaning it was at a time in New Zealand when the posts have been well and truly packed up for the season, with rugby consumption a purely televised event because that’s when the All Blacks are usually touring Europe.

“We felt we had no option other than to get it off the ground as fast as we could, using the momentum of the World Cup last year,” World Rugby director of women’s rugby Sally Horrox said in November.

“We were always aware of the fact that there would be a clash, which is not ideal. In an ideal world, you would have some clear water between the two.”

It was, unfortunately, in stark contrast to the women’s World Cup held a year beforehand. The final at a sold-out Eden Park will go down as one of the greatest games ever played in New Zealand, men’s or women’s, and seemed to signify a change in the air. The Black Ferns still were able to draw an impressive 11,000 to a test against Australia in Hamilton in September, but only a month later the WXV 1 crowds were down on what was expected.

It also didn’t help that the Black Ferns just weren’t very good last season. It was the first time they’d ever lost to France at home, and the first time they’d dropped two tests on NZ soil in a season as well.

Kiwis are unsurprisingly extremely perceptive with the inner workings and undoings of their rugby teams: while the Black Ferns won the World Cup not many in New Zealand fooled themselves into thinking that it wasn’t a massively fortuitous upset of the dominant English, by the time WXV 1 rolled around it was obvious that the side was in a serious rebuild phase.

That same public attitude is one that Aupiki needs to overcome too, although the signs by the end of the 2023 season were that it was a seriously viable product. Again, the biggest stage provided the best rugby when Matatu beat Chiefs Manawa 33-31 in a thrilling final.

“I think that the women’s rugby opportunities that we’re offering are good for those solid fans. I mean, I don’t know how many conversations I’ve had with those kind of avid male fans that are like, ‘I’m loving watching women’s rugby. It’s back to the good old classic rugby’” says Beard.

“They (traditional rugby fans) are an incredibly valuable asset to our rugby family because they’re such massive advocates. Feeling better about being an advocate, a salesperson, a promoter of women’s rugby is absolutely integral to us and the game and listening to them is really important.”

Which is why NZR’s plans are more about the ground up, because the goals of the women and girls strategy is to make sure there is a sustainable playing base in 10 years’ time. Most of the players who will pull on Black Ferns jerseys by that time may not have even picked a ball up yet.

Some of the fledgling players may well find themselves lining up against the Lions in 2027. There’s a lot of water to go under the bridge between now and then, including the rumoured 2025 arrival of a Warriors women’s side in the rapidly expanding NRLW competition, which will test the already shallow women’s talent pool that union and league very much share in New Zealand.

“We have nothing to be fear,” Beard said. “We’re so proud that they are getting a Warriors women’s team underway, there is no competition if everyone’s successful.”

That’s fair, especially since it would be tricky to reverse the ‘live and let live’ policy towards code swapping players so far. Just having young girls with a ball in their hands helps the ultimate goal of upping the participation rate, which is ultimately much more important than a Lions tour that will, admittedly, be an experiment.

Then again, given the success of women’s Rugby World Cup and the FIFA Women’s World Cup in the country last year, the blueprint is there to make it work. So as long as things are done currently, every goal can be achieved by the time the tour happens.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kubota Spears vs Saitama Wild Knights | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The gruelling reality behind one of the fastest sports in the world | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

Perry Baker in the house | HSBC Life on Tour | Los Angeles

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 6 | Le Crunch

The Unexpected Journey to USA 7s Glory | Aaron Cummings | Sevens Wonders

USA vs Japan | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
P
Pecos 477 days ago

Very good.


The sooner the Aupiki & the SRW competitions can be joined the better. Four teams in a comp quickly wears thin.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BC 2 hours ago
Black Ferns reward 18-year-old's form in team to face Wallaroos

Yes, I think that NZ have to work on their forward play if they are going to go the whole way again. I don’t know too much about your forwards but there do seem to be some familiar names still being selected that have come up short in the past. You have considerable talent in the backs but you will need the ball. There is much truth in the saying “forwards win matches and the backs decide by how many”. I would agree with your comment about Leti-I’iga and Woodman has a lot to assimilate in very few matches as a possible 13, perhaps the hardest position to play. I shall watch your match on Saturday with much interest, though not in the middle of our night.


Unfortunately two of Ireland’s top forwards have been ruled out by injury. I’m not sure they have enough depth to cope with that in the latter stages of the WC.


The performance of France at Twickenham was a surprise, you never know which French team will turn up. Having said that, for most of the match they were second best, but some slack tackling, complacency?, and their Gallic pride got them close on the scoreboard. I was there and whilst eventually grateful for the final whistle, we never felt their late flourish would prevail. When the Mexican wave starts after 25 minutes, you know the crowd thinks it’s already all over. You are right though, do not write off the French, they have strong forwards and flair in the backs. Give them an inch and they will take a mile. On their day they are a real handful for any team.

4 Go to comments
B
BigGabe 2 hours ago
'Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking.'

Fair commentary. I am not sure it would probably work against him though, since his temmates have come out and said that they enjoy it. Similarly, Irish fans seem to enjoy Lowe’s celebrating and English fans their “plastic energy” players.


Oof, that Stormers comment..as a Stormers fan, it hurts to be a Stormers fan. We can be so good, but also we can collapse like a house of cards. I do think that there is a line, I would agree with you. But I also very much think that the rugby public blows it out of proportion when someone gets exuberant (Lowe annoys the daylights out of me, but that’s his game and he is good at it. I am sure plenty of people find Faf annoying too). I’m not sure rugby will go the way of the NFL though, I do think that on a cultural level rugby playing nations (and the cultural demographics that go into playing rugby) differ vastly from the US. The US as a nation is very much about bravado. Similarly, the argument about rugby devolving into football, it is a sport that rewards theatrics so naturally theatrics enter into the culture. I don’t see rugby going that way, there is something different about rugby and the people that it attracts. Perhaps it is the gladiatorial aspect, or the lack of insultingly large paychecks. I am not sure, it would be interesting to conduct a study on this to be honest.


Yes, my examples go back quite far and are sporadic inbetween. But this makes me wonder - does rugby not have so many showboats because it doesn’t attract showboats or because it doesn’t allow showboats?

13 Go to comments
W
Werner 3 hours ago
URC teams aren't proving Stephen Donald wrong

3 things:


1) I don't think you have an understanding of what sort of politics goes on in SA, you are assuming it's very competitive and performance focused same as NZ, I can tell you it's a lot greyer and more ambiguous but green and gold goes along way in greasing wheels. Often revenue at the state and national level are prized more by some in the SARU despite the impact of accepting it, but you will never heard them own it.


2) While we're comparing national teams performance to gauge the ‘domestic’ comps, you do realise that both Ireland and Scotland are higher in rankings and have better recent record than Fiji and Australia who are in the SRP right? And when was the last time either of them made a final in SR? 2014! But here's the thing…. I never said URC is better than SRP, imo they are about the same each with their benefits and different style. Where as you harp on about how crap URC teams are but not why SRP is better. Have SRP teams faired better against European teams? No? So how do you know and ‘demonstrate’ this inferiority? both have a range of good and bad countries competing (URC has slightly more higher ranked teams). Both are dominated historically by one country and team (Leinster/crusaders). So what is this demonstrable fact I'm missing? What's the point of difference other than subjective opinion


3) let me understand this, the only decent team in the URC is Leinster as they are good enough to make Eurochamps finals but not good enough to make the finals of the URC the last 2 years. So they despite beating Leinster (the EC finalists and good team) the other URC teams are still crap?

50 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING British and Irish Lions squad 2025: 10 losers from Andy Farrell's selection British and Irish Lions squad 2025: 10 losers
Search