Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

State of South African franchises under the spotlight

Josh Navidi (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The British & Irish Lions second tour win, another 50-point battering of a South African club franchise, has put the spotlight on the competitiveness of their opponents.

ADVERTISEMENT

When the Lions toured to New Zealand in 2017, most of New Zealand’s Super franchises were competitive against the Lions, who were often filled with test-calibre players.

Only the Chiefs ended up on the wrong side of a lopsided score, with the Blues and Highlanders winning while the Hurricanes had a draw. The Crusaders lost in a tryless fixture 12-3, which was played at test intensity.

Video Spacer

Gatland talks about the chances of the test series going ahead

Video Spacer

Gatland talks about the chances of the test series going ahead

After two games in South Africa, the Lions have had a cakewalk so far against the Sigma Lions and the Cell C Sharks, winning by 56-14 and 54-7.

The Springboks have pulled all of their squad members out of their franchises, leaving the domestic teams short of firepower to match it with the British & Irish Lions.Combined with a playing base that is largely offshore, the local teams are ‘as weak as they have ever been’.

South African rugby fans were brutally honest about the state of the domestic game, calling it ’embarassing’ and ‘weak’.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bulls, who won the South African conference of the Rainbow Cup, were labelled ‘still pretty weak’. They are expected to put up the most resistance to the best of the home nations.

The final between Benneton and the Bulls last month showed the gap between the European Pro14 sides and the South African franchises. Against the Lions without any Springbok players, they have become ‘cannon fodder’ leaving the fans without a spectacle.

With little question over who will win the remaining warm-up games, the discussion has leaned into who will be better prepared for the test series with the Lions failing to get a real challenge before the Springboks.

The Springboks themselves, who were unconvincing in their first test against Georgia, have had their second test cancelled after a wave of Covid cases across both teams and could head into the series with just one game under their belt.

ADVERTISEMENT

South African journalist Mark Keohane, who predicted a 3-0 series win to the Springboks, is confident the cakewalk games the Lions are playing will leave them underprepared for the tests.

Writing for the Daily Maverick, South African rugby writer Craig Ray wrote the mood in the Springboks camp is becoming increasingly ‘pessimistic’.

“Word from inside that the camp is that the mood is becoming more pessimistic as the reality that they will be hopelessly undercooked when, and if, they face a British & Lions, crystallises for the Bok squad,” he wrote.

The Springboks are unable to train together while key members are isolating, further delaying the squad from getting into test-match form.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 42 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

4 Go to comments
J
JW 57 minutes ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search