Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Stephen Donald's four picks to return to All Blacks squad for Rugby Championship

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

World Cup-winning former All Blacks first-five Stephen Donald his outlined the four players he believes should return to the New Zealand squad for the upcoming Rugby Championship campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks were scheduled to announce a 36-man squad for the Rugby Championship on Wednesday, but that has been delayed as selectors await medical updates for certain players.

The delay comes during the same week that the All Blacks find themselves under immense public pressure after falling to a historic home series defeat against Ireland.

Video Spacer

Ardie Savea and Dane Coles speak to media after All Blacks loss to Ireland

Video Spacer

Ardie Savea and Dane Coles speak to media after All Blacks loss to Ireland

With four losses in their last five test, head coach Ian Foster believed to have met with New Zealand Rugby chief executive Mark Robinson to discuss his future in the role on Tuesday.

It follows a statement issued by Robinson on Sunday in which he said recent results were “not acceptable” and that a review is being undertaken into the series defeat.

As such, changes – both within the coaching and playing ranks – are expected when the All Blacks eventually name their Rugby Championship squad.

Which exact changes will be made remains to be seen, but Donald has named four players who could earn themselves a recall into the national set-up.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking on SENZ, Donald said four-test loosehead prop Ethan de Groot, uncapped utility forward Tom Robinson, one-test utility forward Cullen Grace and 17-test halfback Brad Weber are all in the reckoning for inclusion.

After making his All Blacks debut last year, De Groot was a surprise omission from the All Blacks squad named to take on Ireland, as Foster and his assistants instead opted for France-bound Karl Tu’inukuafe and the uncapped Aidan Ross.

However, with Tu’inukuafe set to leave Kiwi shores at the end of the year, and Ross battling injury concerns, Donald said it makes sense to bring De Groot back into the fold.

“If [Tu’inukuafe] doesn’t get replaced by Ethan de Groot this time around… We got told the reasoning why he [De Groot] wasn’t the first time around – fitness and they wanted to make sure they won the Irish series,” Donald told SENZ.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It just doesn’t make sense now to not try and blood Ethan going forward. He’s shown enough to deserve that.”

Related

Elsewhere in the tight five, injuries to Brodie Retallick and Scott Barrett may force changes to the All Blacks’ stocks at lock.

Retallick has been ruled out for between six-to-eight weeks with a broken cheekbone after he endured a head clash with Ireland prop Andrew Porter during last week’s loss in Wellington.

Barrett, meanwhile, was a late omission from the match day team for that test after sustaining an Achilles injury earlier in the week.

The severity of Barrett’s injury is yet to be confirmed, but news of his injury comes after young second rower Josh Lord was sidelined for the rest of the year with a ruptured ACL before the Ireland series even kicked off.

That could leave the All Blacks with only three fit locks to pick from in Sam Whitelock, Tupou Vaa’i and Patrick Tuipulotu – the latter of whom was only made available to play from the second test onwards after being granted dispensation upon his sabbatical return in Japan.

Therefore, reinforcements in that positional group may be needed for the Rugby Championship, and Donald pinpointed Robinson and Grace as the two leading candidates to fill the voids left by Retallick and Barrett.

Both players are capable of playing throughout the forward pack, with Robinson – normally a blindside flanker – often used as a lock by the Blues in this year’s Super Rugby Pacific.

Grace, meanwhile, starred for the Crusaders and Maori All Blacks as a No 8, but has also played his fair share of first-class rugby as a blindside flanker and lock.

Donald believes that versatility could be valuable for the All Blacks, especially given Barrett was seemingly New Zealand’s first-choice No 6 despite normally playing lock.

Related

After starring at blindside flanker in the first test against Ireland, Barrett was only moved to lock for the second test due to the unavailability of Whitelock and Vaa’i, and was named to start at No 6 for the third test before injury struck.

Without him and Retallick, Donald said Robinson and Grace could come into the selection mix as he also made note of other contenders such as Highlanders pair Josh Dickson and Shannon Frizell.

“The Brodie Retallick, Scott Barrett potential double-whammy is an issue,” Donald said.

“Obviously Scott Barrett, under the current coaching regime… Is seen as a six as far as the top XV goes, which may change tomorrow, but we just have to presume he’s a six-lock.

“All of a sudden, does Tom Robinson – and I know this will be music to the ears of many a Blues fan – does he, all of a sudden, come into the consideration because he’s done the lock-six thing?

“You mentioned Josh Dickson, who’s already been in and around [the All Blacks squad], obviously Frizell’s been an All Black.

“Cullen Grace is the obvious one. The drums are just beating so loud. You’d imagine he comes in for someone.”

Donald went on to highlight that, without Barrett, the All Blacks would be left with Akira Ioane as the only blindside flanker in the squad, which he said could further necessitate the inclusion of Grace.

“Apart from Akira [Ioane] now, if Barrett’s out, he is the only No 6 in the squad,” Donald said.

Related

“Akira was great in Wellington, probably – along with Ardie [Savea] – our best All Black, so he’s well and truly cemented himself in the squad, but does Cullen Grace come in anyway?”

The only other “contentious issue” in Donald’s view comes at halfback, where he believes Weber – who was among the highest-profile exclusions from the All Blacks squad to face Ireland – may have earned a recall.

Picked to play for the Maori All Blacks alongside co-captain and fellow exiled All Blacks halfback TJ Perenara, Weber caught Donald’s eye during his side’s two-match series against Ireland.

“Brad Weber, I think, certainly didn’t go backwards in the Maori camp. It goes without saying he gets a nomination,” Donald told SENZ.

“I had people who don’t usually take much interest in All Blacks selections messaging me saying, ‘Jeez, Brad Weber’s unlucky’, and his Maori performances were great.”

In saying that, Donald struggled to find a reason to cut debutant halfback Folau Fakatava from the side, meaning the All Blacks selectors may have to pick and choose between Weber and Finlay Christie to accompany the incumbent Aaron Smith.

“But then, also, would you go with the All Blacks with [Folau] Fakatava, who’s now seen as a bench man who’s added something different to that role for the All Blacks?” he said.

“I couldn’t imagine him getting cast aside, so then it becomes a straight shootout between Finlay and Brad Weber.

‘While Finlay can put his hands up and say, ‘Well, I was apart of the Eden Park game and that was it’, so does that deserve to be dropped? There’s so many things to think about there.”

The All Blacks will open their Rugby Championship campaign with two tests against the Springboks in South Africa on August 6 and August 13.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 26 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search