Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Stephen Perofeta impresses at No 10 as Roger Tuivasa-Sheck shifts roles

Roger Tuivasa-Sheck. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

Two All Blacks have accrued some much-needed play-time in Saturday night’s NPC clash between Auckland and Taranaki.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stephen Perofeta lined up for No 10 for Taranaki while the home side had Roger Tuivasa-Sheck at their services – but not in his customary midfield role.

While Tuivasa-Sheck has previously made all his starting appearances for the Blues and Auckland at second five-eighth, he was somewhat surprisingly enlisted on the wing on Saturday evening, potentially hinting at a positional change for the national side.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Tuivasa-Sheck has made two fleeting appearances for the All Blacks this year, clocking up a collective 20 minutes against Ireland and Australia. Both those appearances were in the midfield, with the 29-year-old replacing Blues teammate Rieko Ioane for his debut and Jordie Barrett in his most recent appearances against the Wallabies last weekend.

Before Tuivasa-Sheck made the switch to rugby union following a decorated 10-year career in the 13-man code, pundits were split over the best position for the fleet-footed league outside back.

“Our dialogue has been minimal around that type of thing,” said Blues coach Leon MacDonald when Tuivasa-Sheck was first recruited. “He gives us versatility. He played schoolboy rugby in midfield, and has been playing his league in the outsides. One of the attractions for us is he is a multi-skilled player and provides options.”

While cross-code star Sonny Bill Williams suggested his former teammate might initially suit a role on the wing or at fullback, MacDonald confirmed ahead of the 2022 Super Rugby Pacific season that they would be employing Tuivasa-Sheck in the midfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think he looks good there, he looks really good there,” MacDonald said.

“He likes being in the middle of the play, he likes to have the ball in his hands. He’s able to take the line on, which he enjoys, and he loves the physicality, so he’s enjoying the defensive side of it as well.”

That’s exactly where Tuivasa-Sheck has lined up since making the transition to union – until Saturday night, where he looked comfortable in the No 14 jersey as Auckland bounced back from a 17-3 deficit to record a sizeable 38-24 win over Taranaki at Eden Park.

Related

Perofeta, on the other hand, has regularly swapped between first five and fullback but has had precious little minutes in the former role this year since spending much of the Blues campaign at No 10.

In fact, Perofeta has managed just four appearances since Super Rugby Pacific came to an end, including a minute of action for the All Blacks in their loss to Argentina.

ADVERTISEMENT

Back in his favoured role against Auckland, Perofeta was in superb form, sparking all three of the visitors’ tries.

Perofeta’s explosiveness wasn’t enough to help his team to a victory, however, with the Auckland forwards taking control of proceedings in the second spell and powering their side to a strong victory ahead of next weekend’s play-offs, where they will take on North Harbour.

The defeat means Taranaki will finish the season with just three wins, marking a massive fall from grace for the Bulls who went undefeated through last year’s campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search