Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Steve Diamond: 'It was like going to a funeral for six hours'

Newcastle boss Steve Diamond (Photo by Bob Bradford/CameraSport via Getty Images)

Steve Diamond has started to pick up the pieces of the latest Newcastle setback, getting his players back on the training ground on Wednesday following a couple of days off after the embarrassing hiding suffered last Sunday at Bristol.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bottom-of-the-table Falcons slumped to their 15th successive Gallagher Premiership defeat this season, getting annihilated 85-14 at Ashton Gate on a 13-2 try count after improved performances in their previous two games with new boss Diamond at the helm of the team he inherited from the sacked Alex Codling.

Newcastle battled to a 16-25 loss at Exeter on March 23 and followed it by giving Leicester a fright in a 13-19 home defeat six days later. However, the 23-day gap until their next outing at Bristol turned into a disaster as the hope they would be a better-prepared team with the three-week lay-off was shattered by going three tries down as early as the 13th minute.

Video Spacer

Nemani Nadolo on his peak and once being considered “too big”

Former Fijian winger Nemani Nadolo chats to Liam Heagney about when he reached his peak and how he was actually at one stage considered too big to play rugby.

Video Spacer

Nemani Nadolo on his peak and once being considered “too big”

Former Fijian winger Nemani Nadolo chats to Liam Heagney about when he reached his peak and how he was actually at one stage considered too big to play rugby.

Diamond travelled back to the northeast on the team bus and quizzed by RugbyPass about what that 500-kilometre trip was like, Diamond quipped: “Well, they were high-fiving, we stopped at a couple of brothels on the way back and bought loads of booze. What do you think it was like, Liam? The bus, there wasn’t deathly silence but it wasn’t far off. It was like going to a funeral for six hours.”

How did they fill the time? “Well, we obviously watched the game in the front of the bus and we had a discussion but I am a big believer in not being reactionary, so we weren’t going down the aisle in the bus every 20 minutes giving them a bollocking.

Attack

305
Passes
67
180
Ball Carries
58
538m
Post Contact Metres
127m
27
Line Breaks
2

“We were chatting away and the staff and the players keep themselves to themselves. When you win a game comfortably, it’s the same thing happens. There is no change on the bus. If there is at other clubs that’s new to me. But we put it to bed until we come and review the game 24, 48 hours later.

“The lads were obviously very disappointed but no different to when they have been beaten by a high score before. I don’t know what’s worse, getting beaten 85-14 or losing without a bonus point by 20-10. They’re both frustrating but the beauty of the job, if it was easy everybody would be doing it. It’s not an easy task. I have been set the task to get it sorted and it’s important that everybody sticks together and we have a plan moving forward week by week, month by month.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Such was the embarrassing margin on the scoreboard in Bristol, it would have been understandable if Diamond had given the players an Alex Ferguson-style hairdryer treatment. However, having avoided giving a verbal spray, was his tact appreciated?

“I don’t know whether appreciate is the right word if I’m honest. I think they respect being treated like adults who have not performed. And like the coaching staff haven’t performed either; it’s not just them.

“But it’s a short time to turn around and the beauty of the game is if you turn up mentally not right you get it handed to you like happened in Sunday, but we have seven days later we have got the opportunity to put a performance in and be motivated to maybe not get a top four spot, we’ll definitely not but to get some pride.”

Diamond’s old club Sale are the visitors to Kingston Park next Sunday where a family fun day has Newcastle poised to welcome their biggest attendance of the season – beating the 7,112 high last month versus Leicester and boosting the current average of 5,755. Did the consultant director of rugby have a message for the fans?

ADVERTISEMENT

“No message from me really. The biggest crowd of the season; I think the support base will be patient with me coming in like I have done. They are voting with their feet, ie the biggest crowd of the season.

“We have had 35, 40 sponsors here today [Wednesday] who have been involved, watching training and listening to the team meetings which we were very open with. My job at Newcastle is to attempt to get the rugby right over the next three to five years and that’s what we will do.

“The marketing team, obviously by having the biggest crowd of the season, do a very good job. If they need advice, they probably don’t need to come to me on that. I need advice, if anybody, because I’m the one who is not pulling my weight by the looks of things getting beat 85-14.”

Has last weekend’s thrashing been talked about yet with club owner Semore Kurdi and chairman of rugby Matt Thompson? “No. Don’t need to talk it over. We all have roles and responsibilities, accountabilities. That’s the way it works. The rugby committee meets once a week. We’ve not met this week because it was Tuesday and it was a day off. We will no doubt catch up sometime in the week.”

Diamond was blunt when asked for his assessment of his Sale successor Alex Sanderson, who will come to Newcastle looking to enhance his team’s play-off prospects. “Done a cracking job,” he said curtly before going on to suggest that coaching versus the Sharks was no big deal despite all the time he spent at the Manchester club as a player and coach.

“Well, I coached Saracens, coached Worcester against Sale, did the recruitment for Northampton for four years, so I have come across Sale many times. There is a lot of good memories and a lot of friends who worked there and work there still. There will be no of that kerfuffle before the game. After the game we will shake hands and people will move on, like they always do.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 42 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Former All Blacks coach offers progress report on Joseph Manu's preseason Former All Blacks coach confident in Joseph Manu's progress
Search