Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Stick should be the next Springboks coach

South Africa backs coach Mzwandile Stick before the Bank of Ireland Nations Series match between Ireland and South Africa at the Aviva Stadium in Dublin. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Opinion polls aren’t necessarily accurate predictors of the future. If they were, the UK would have voted to remain in the European Union and Donald Trump would never have set foot in the Oval Office.

ADVERTISEMENT

Polls have even less sway in undemocratic bodies, such as SA Rugby, where decisions are made by a select few regardless of the whims of the masses.

Even so, polls are a handy barometer to gauge public perception. And after the widely read SA Rugby Magazine received close to 10,000 votes on a particular query, my only assumption is that the forecast is set to ‘crazy’.

The question was simple: Who would you pick as the next Springbok coach? The incumbent, Jacques Nienaber, will leave his post at the end of this year’s Rugby World Cup to take on an assistant role with Leinster. More on that later. What’s pertinent now is the baffling result that left me mildly irritated and feeling like the only sane person in the world.

That’s not quite true. I wasn’t alone. From the group of nearly 10,000, 6.15 per cent agreed with me that Mzwandile Stick, currently the Boks’ backline coach, should be promoted once the campaign in France comes to an end.

The clear winner of the poll was Johan Ackermann, in charge of the Urayasu D-Rocks in Japan, with 29.26 per cent of the vote. Next came John Dobson, the current Stormers boss, with 21.78 per cent. Completing the podium was SA Rugby’s director of rugby, Rassie Erasmus, with 19.36 per cent.

Stick was a distant fourth, marginally ahead of Glasgow Warriors coach, Franco Smith (5.33), as well as other big names including the Bulls boss, Jake White (4.91) and Johann van Graan (3.45), presently battling to get a tune out of Bath, but well respected after his time as South Africa’s forwards coach for five years in the mid-2010s and then as the leader of Munster.

ADVERTISEMENT
Stick Springboks critics Championship
(Photo by Richard Huggard/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Of all the coaches listed above, Stick has the least amount of experience leading a team. In 2015 he steered the Eastern Province U19s to domestic glory but eyebrows were raised when he was fast tracked to the Springbok set-up to serve as an assistant to Allister Coetzee.

During Coetzee’s disastrous tenure, Stick was demoted to the South African U20 set-up but those eyebrows were once again lifted when Erasmus recalled him to the senior fold in 2018. Clearly the World Cup winning coach saw something in the former sevens star.

Stick’s primary mandate was to develop the finer skills of the Springboks. So often derided as a one dimensional squad, the reigning world champions now possess a backline that would be unrecognisably South African only five years ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lukhanyo Am is the most skilful outside centre on the planet. Damian Willemse’s development over the past two seasons has been astronomical. The flair demonstrated by Kurt-Lee Arendse, Manie Libbok, Canan Moodie and Cheslin Kolbe points to an outfit that can cut opposition teams to shreds if given half a chance. The Springboks have always had, and will surely always have, enough grunt up front to gain front foot ball. Now more than ever, they have dazzlers in the backs to do something with it.

To give Stick all the credit would be disingenuous. But to not portion at least a sizable share in his direction would be unfair. Smarter rugby minds than me would be better placed to explain exactly what Stick has done, but the nuts and bolts are irrelevant. According to the naked eye test from last year’s Autumn internationals, the Boks’ blunt instrument now has a newfound edge.

If Stick has an astute assistant who could marshal the forwards – perhaps Van Graan if he could be tempted back – would supplement any of his shortcomings. What Stick does not lack, and where he needs no help, is understanding the ethos of a team that, more than any other international side, carries the responsibility of representation on its shoulders.

Let’s not dance around the subject. Stick is Black African, one of around 42 million who make up more than 80 per cent of the country’s population. Coetzee’s appointment was a landmark moment for a team that still plays under a badge that was once a symbol of apartheid. Like Siya Kolisi’s selection as the team’s first Black African captain, Stick’s elevation to head coach would be another marker that the Springboks are an evolving force.

This would not be a political move. His work with the backline and his status in the team cannot be questioned. In press conferences he is belligerent and honest, two traits that are highly valued in South African rugby. He confronts probing journalists and leans into challenging questions. When his team is accused of playing ‘boring’ rugby he simply points at the groaning trophy cabinet back home and the scorecards that more often than not favour his team. More than Nienaber, who often looks uncomfortable in his media engagements, Stick has embraced this off field role.

Related

Selecting Stick would also send an important message to any aspiring coaches. It would demonstrate the value of participation; that being ensconced within the system holds value. And that is an important message right now.

Nienaber’s exit should be a concern for everyone involved in South African rugby. The leader of the reigning world champions has been lured by a provincial team to work as a deputy. Lienster are immense, and Nienaber is perhaps better suited to a role that the South African journalist Craig Ray called, “mud on the boots” coaching, but the transition is jarring nonetheless.

Felix Jones will also make way after the World Cup and there are questions around Erasmus’ long term future. The World Cup could also be the end of Kolisi’s tenure and the tournament will surely see the likes of Duane Vermeulen, Willie le Roux and Frans Steyn exit stage left.

Whoever is at the helm will need to impart tactical nous, skills transference and a strong sense of identity onto a team in transition. Stick, more than anyone else, ticks these boxes.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
Johan 563 days ago

Daniel, I also think Mzwandile Stick should be the next Springbok coach. He is a down-to-earth human being. I like him a lot.

Daniel, I am objecting to your use of 'Black African'.

I am quoting you:

'Let’s not dance around the subject. Stick is Black African, one of around 42 million who make up more than 80 per cent of the country’s population. Coetzee’s appointment was a landmark moment for a team that still plays under a badge that was once a symbol of apartheid. Like Siya Kolisi’s selection as the team’s first Black African captain, Stick’s elevation to head coach would be another marker that the Springboks are an evolving force.'

Daniel, I would have thought that a journalist of your experience and standing would know it is racist to talk like that.

I am offended when people refer to me as a 'White South African' or 'White African'. I am just an earthling.

My ancestors were from all over the earth, including Africa. I believe that is also the case with most of us living here in the south of Africa., including the current Springbok coaching staff.

Dividing South Africans into a 'White' group and a 'Black' group is a racist way of thinking. There is no such thing as a 'black race' and a 'white race'. That type of thinking is racism of the highest order.

Daniel, I would appreciate it if you would be more discerning about your choice of terminology.

J
Jimmy S 610 days ago

Mzwandile has grown immeasurably over the last number of years and has become relatively credible in an assistant role through immense guidance (a similar beneficiary would be Johan Van Graan as a comparative example of benefiting from being in the same environment). Unfortunately a fast lane might get you out the pit stop quickly but it wont win you the race against other seasoned race teams who have winning purely on the mind. The real purpose of Transformation in South Africa is to provide opportunities for people who were previously disadvantaged and more than good enough or deserving but unable to advance due to restrictive policies of the past. Lukhanyo Am, Cheslin Kolbe, Trevor Nyakanye, Siya Kolisi, Kurt-Lee Arendse, etc are examples of world class talent who would not have realised their talents without this policy being applied intentionally. A maligned policy but proof that its application works when applied in its truest purpose. The possible appointment of Mzwandile is a slap in the face or an injustice if you like when compared to the highly talented coaches deserving of the opportunity such as Joey Mongalo (Bulls & Sharks) and Bafana Nhleko (SA U20) who would thrive and prove their worth like the players listed above of their talents if given the chance. They have both demonstrated track records worthy of ascension. Van Graan benefitted from perceived nepotism and has shown he is unable to go it alone and Stick is no different in a standalone ability sense. Neither are good enough and the possible appointment of Stick is a backwards step when the prerequisite for advancing in coaching is a proven track record.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search