Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Stormers detail plan for using new prodigy flyhalf and Baby Bok captain

(Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

South Africa Under-20 captain Sacha Mngomezulu’s future is at flyhalf.

However, for the foreseeable future, he will feature at inside centre at the Stormers.

It is in line with a development process used to great success by New Zealand – playing a rookie next to a seasoned player.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mngomezulu, 20, was one of the key figures in the Stormers’ win over Italian outfit Zebre at the weekend.

The Stormers, along with the Lions, flew the South African flag in the United Rugby Championship at the weekend.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

They grabbed a third successive victory to remain unbeaten this season, as they beat Zebre 37-20 in northern Italy.

And the message was clear: ‘Mngomezulu is integral to the future of the Stormers’

Mngomezulu, who is a natural flyhalf, was named at inside centre for the trip to Parma and was showered with praise for a mature performance.

“He was absolutely outstanding,” Stormers coach John Dobson said.

“He is so competitive and his work rate is very special,” Dobson added.

The additional responsibility of goal-kicking did not phase him, even though his first few attempts at goal were off target.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our plan with him is probably to let him settle at No.12 and then longer-term he could be one of the better flyhalves in this country,” the Stormers coach said.

“We are very, very excited about all these young players that we’ve got – whether it’s Sacha, Suleiman [Hartzenberg], Imad Khan, Conor Evans and Paul de Villiers.

“We are excited about the future.”

Dobson said that Mngomezulu is facing a head workload in a very taxing season – with the Stormers starting their first European Cup campaign in December.

“Sacha was outstanding,” Dobson said about the win in Parma, adding: “He doesn’t have to start every game in what will probably be a breakout season.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Manie [Libbok] is definitely our No.1 flyhalf.

“Damian [Willemse] will play at No.12 and No.15, depending on how Clayton [Blommetjies] goes and our injury situation at centre.

“It’s not impossible to see Manie at No.10, Sacha at No.12 and Damian at fullback, if Clayton’s not around.”

The Stormers coach said the need for more squad depth, with the additional load of also playing in the European Cup, means there is an obvious need for utility players.

“Sacha has been exposed to this level, he has confidence and is very good.

“We won’t be running out with our best combination every week.

“We will have Blomme [Clayton Blommetjies] coming back next week and Damian [Willemse] probably going home.

“We have to build capacity and he is a massive step forward in that regard.

“The short answer is that he [Mngomezulu] will pretty much be involved in our matchday 23 every match, unless something goes wrong.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
N
NJ 802 days ago

So calm and cool, go you boytjie!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search