Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Stung the hell out of me': Sam Cane explains very clearly his role for the All Blacks

Captain Sam Cane of New Zealand leads his team out for The Rugby Championship match between the New Zealand All Blacks and South Africa Springboks at Mt Smart Stadium on July 15, 2023 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

All Blacks captain Sam Cane has always had scrutiny with regards to his selection in the famous No 7 jersey.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cane had massive shoes to fill as the heir to Richie McCaw as the All Blacks openside flanker in 2016, public pressure that only intensified when he took on the captaincy role in 2020 following the retirement of Kieran Read.

The New Zealand public has had an affinity for other No 7s during his career, Ardie Savea of the Hurricanes and more recently Dalton Papalii of the Blues.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However, the Chiefs’ loose forward has remained Ian Foster’s first choice option and team leader which has come with much criticism.

During the infamous Ireland series loss, Cane went after his opposite and World Rugby Player of the Year Josh van der Flier but came off second best.

The 31-year-old opened up with Scotty Stevenson in a revealing interview ahead of his third Rugby World Cup where he offered an insight into what the All Blacks want from an openside.

According to Cane, it is really the off-the-ball involvements that are high on the priority list whilst the more noticeable aspects, like winning turnovers at the ruck, are not part of the ‘key jobs’.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first is to do with cleaning out the threats at the first ruck following a lineout and scrum.

“I have three key jobs in this team and the first is secure quick ball off our first strike from set piece,” Cane explained.

“I missed one last week [against Australia in Dunedin] and even if others didn’t notice it stung the hell out of me.”

One of the hallmarks of Cane’s game is his physicality in defence, but it is his ability to reload again that is monitored and measured.

The All Blacks have more opportunity to control the gain line the faster the openside can return to his feet to join the line.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The second is to have the ability to make a tackle and to get back to my feet and into the defensive line to make another,” he said.

“We call those back-to-back efforts, and the statistics we keep around that are very comprehensive. I always want to be at the top in those statistics.”

The last key area is the force inflicted on attacking rucks to help generate quick ball for the attack.

The All Blacks are able to be at their best when the ruck speed is high.

“That third truly crucial area is to make sure I am hitting defenders hard at the breakdown, which then helps our attack set for the next strike,” he said.

“If I can do all those things well I can usually walk off the field feeling satisfied with the day’s work.”

All of three of the core responsibilities can go unnoticed to naked eye which could help explain the public indifference towards Cane as a player.

Only the data around speed can explain Cane’s effectiveness to the All Blacks which is not readily available.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
P
Pecos 485 days ago

This soft media ptopaganda approach is revisionist. One basic difference between Cane & McCaw is that Cane hasn't even filled his own boots. Since 2019 he's only played 21 tests of the 39 ABs test matches. About FIFTY PERCENT. And that doesn't include times he's left the paddock injured such as the Boks at Mt Smart (when he missed the whole 2nd half). This "now you see me now you don't" leadership model has destabilized the ABs to the point where when Cane inevitably gets injured at RWC, I suspect he won't be missed.

B
Bruce 485 days ago

I've watched him a lot especially after the criticism got very loud on social media. I always thought him a tackling machine and it's not surprising he's had some bad injuries.
And he does his core roll extremely well, making telling tackles and cleaning out rucks, in the first twenty minutes of a game he's hardly seen if you just follow the ball. I bet the opposition know and feel his presence very well.
There's more to the game than just running with the ball or making turnovers. Often those things happen because the likes of Sam do the unseen hard yards.

m
matt 487 days ago

The best game he’s had in the past 2 years was the win in SA when NZ had their backs against the wall. He cleared out a couple rucks like a skud missile. He also got back and secured a position on a back three player caught on a counter. When he’s on like that he really opens it up for his teammates.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 35 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Standout women's rugby moments of 2024 Standout women's rugby moments of 2024
Search