Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby Aotearoa: Chiefs player ratings vs Blues

(Photo by DAVID ROWLAND/AFP via Getty Images)

The Chiefs returned home to the Waikato after their gripping 28-27 loss to the Highlander’s last week in Dunedin and were keen to atone for their fervent fans.

ADVERTISEMENT

Warren Gatland’s men went into the match as favourites despite the Blues’ impressive defeat of the Hurricanes in round one of Super Rugby Aotearoa.

In the absence of skipper Sam Cane, the effervescent Brad Webber led the Chiefs with winger Shaun Stevenson celebrating his 50th cap for the franchise.

Video Spacer

In conversation with the Class of 1995

Historian and author Dean Allen chatted to some of the legends from the 1995 World Cup-winning Springbok team

Video Spacer

In conversation with the Class of 1995

Historian and author Dean Allen chatted to some of the legends from the 1995 World Cup-winning Springbok team

The team remained largely unchanged with Naitoa Ah Kuoi coming off the bench to pair up with Tupou Va’ai in the locking engine room of the scrum, while veteran All Blacks fly half Aaron Cruden moved back into the starting line up to guide his side around FMG Stadium Waikato.

With a persistent drizzle from the heavens and referee Ben O’Keefe providing a literal interpretation of the laws the match struggled to find its rhythm in the first half with the Blues being heavily penalised. The Chiefs failed to cherish possession and their option taking was questionable in the conditions.

The ‘New Blues’ came out in the second half and ground down the inexperienced and mentally vacant Chiefs to secure their first win in the Waikato since 2011.

So, who were the Chiefs’ best in the traditional North Island grudge match:

15. Damian McKenzie – 5.5/10

ADVERTISEMENT

Kicked the points he should have and looked dangerous at times but guilty of kicking poorly in general play. Plenty of effort but decision making and execution let him down too often.

14. Shaun Stevenson – 5/10 

Didn’t see much ball. Silly penalty to start second half. A forgettable performance in his 50th.

13. Quinn Tupaea – 6.5/10

Solid over the ball and pilfered deep in the Blues’ half early in the match. Has the makings to be a special player but can drop off a tackle.

ADVERTISEMENT

12. Anton Lienert-Brown – 7.5/10

Found his way into the game without fuss. Consummate professional didn’t let his side down. Was staunch in defence and in possession.

11. Sean Wainui – 7/10

Wonderful running game and attacked the high ball well and chased his kicks, yet guilty of poor passing at times putting his side under pressure. Despite that one of the better players for the Chiefs.

10. Aaron Cruden – 7.5/10

Under played himself in attack early on and looked better when he took on the line later in the match. Kicked fairly well and made a number of crucial tackles and didn’t shirk to dirty work. A committed professional performance from the veteran.

9. Brad Weber (captain) – 4.5/10

A really questionable performance. His option taking and execution was substandard despite his efforts. Somewhat absent as a leader on the night hooked at the 64th minute.

8. Pita Gus Sowakula – 6/10

Carried well and defended well. The big man was industrious throughout with fellow backrowers but lacked the extra punch through the midfield that was required.

7. Lachlan Boshier – 7/10

A comprehensive performance and frustrated the Blues over the ball as expected. Failed to link with his backs when attacking opportunity presented but best Chiefs forward on the park.

6. Luke Jacobson – 6.5/10

Worked exceptionally hard in tight yet later in the match he was guilty of infringing around the breakdown that cost his side momentum and points.

5. Naitoa Ah Kuoi – 6/10

A mixed bag. Talent and inexperience both on display but liked his attitude. Had a crack and was in just about everything. Has the makings of a very good tight forward.

4. Tupou Va’ai – 6/10

Similar to his locking partner. Worked hard but for every positive impact there was a negative. Did not look out of place at this level but still so raw.

3. Nepo Laulala – 7/10

Very solid performance by the All Black. Hands let him down at times but he worked tirelessly at set piece and in the tight. Chiefs scrum solid when Nepo was at the cornerstone.

2. Samisoni Taukei’aho – 6.5/10

Lineout needs some work but had some strong carries and was committed to the cause. Much to like about his performance but requires focus and discipline if he is to take his game to the next level.

1. Aidan Ross – 6.5/10

Had some quality moments in tight in both attack and defence. Scrummaged well against a quality opponent.

Replacements:

16. Bradley Slater – 6/10

Provided some impact and his lineout work on a slippery night was okay.

17. Reuben O’Neill – 6.5/10

Has some game about him. Carried well and made a good tackle in cover defence.

18. Ross Geldenhuys – 6/10

The veteran threw himself into it in his cameo yet the Chiefs scrum struggled with him, Slater and O’Neill on the park.

19. Adam Thomson – 5/10

If he was there to help bring the Chiefs with experience in the later stages of the match Thompson didn’t offer that tonight. Still has the quality to do that job but will need to bring it next time around.

20. Dylan Nel – 6/10

Didn’t see much of him but that is not a criticism. Did work hard to lift the tempo and crashed fearlessly into the Blues in attack.

21. Lisati Milo-Harris – 6/10

Toiled away and showed he can play at this level but needed to really martial his troops more.

22. Kaleb Trask – N/A

23. Solomon Alaimal0 – 5.5/10

Worked away but didn’t impose himself on the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search