Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby Aotearoa: Highlanders player ratings vs Blues

(Photo by Dianne Manson/Getty Images)

The final instalment round eight of Super Rugby Aotearoa was fought out between the hardworking Highlanders and the ambitious Blues at Forsyth Barr Stadium in Dunedin on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both sides went into the match with winning form and with the Gordon Hunter Trophy on the line.

The second-placed Blues knew that a loss today would seriously impede their title chances against the Crusaders, who sat comfortably ahead of them with an eight-point buffer before the first whistle.

On the back of a dominant forward pack the Blues were simply too much for the Highlanders and took the match 32-21. The Highlanders to a man did not stop trying, yet poor option-taking and skill execution at pivotal times proved costly.

Video Spacer

Sam Whitelock and Aaron Cruden talk milestones

Video Spacer

Sam Whitelock and Aaron Cruden talk milestones

So, how did the Highlanders rate?

15. Mitch Hunt – 6/10

A fair effort without but not a performance that convinced he is a long-term Highlanders fullback.

14. Josh McKay – 7/10

Didn’t get much opportunity in attack yet applied himself admirably today. He is the type of player that could attract ‘cult-status’ akin to Marty Banks or Richard ‘Barracuda’ Buckman.

ADVERTISEMENT

13. Michael Collins – 6/10

A quiet day for a quality player. Early in the match was guilty of pushing a pass when the Blues were into the Highlanders offensive line that resulted in a turnover. Looked more comfortable at fullback several weeks ago.

12. Sio Tomkinson – 7/10

Had a difficult task today and gave it a fair crack. He was physical in both aspects of play.

11. Scott Gregory – 6.5/10

ADVERTISEMENT

Looking more and more comfortable on the left wing. Works hard in defence and assisted in holding up the Blues attack when they were over the line. Had several impressive involvements in attack yet he may not have the pace to truly dominate at this level?

10. Josh Ioane – 6.5/10

A fair shift by him considering he was working off a forward pack that was dominated and outplayed. Would like to see him take on the line more in attack. Again, there were defensive frailties.

9 Aaron Smith (co-captain) – 7.5/10

Another quality performance by the All Blacks No. 9. Was busy and dangerous all day and appeared to have ‘miked’ a controversial penalty when tripping over Karl Tu’inukuafe, who appeared to have done everything he could to not involved himself in the play. Credit to his cunningness. His try saving ‘boot-under-the-ball’ early in the match was testament to his rugby prowess.

8. Marino Mikaele-Tu’u – 7/10

A definitive performance in attack that confirmed he is an absolute threat in that aspect of the game, yet if he is going to take his game to the next level, he must become more authoritative in defence.

7. Dillon Hunt – 7/10

Appeared to be lost in the fog in the early stages but in the middle of the second half had several exhaustive efforts in possession and was a handful for the Blues. Built small, played big. One of his better performances this season.

6. Shannon Frizell – 8/10

Try saving turnover, dominant tackles, damaging runs and a try all lead to another reason as to why he is a serious contender for the All Blacks No. 6 jersey this season.

5. Jack Whetton – 5.5/10

His highlight was a lineout win at the back and set a stable platform that lead to a Highlanders try off the subsequent driving maul. Needs to find a way to have a greater impact. Gave away a penalty in his own half to rob his side of possession and put them under pressure. Not convinced he is a player of Super Rugby standard.

4. Pari Pari Parkinson – 7/10

Was the main lineout man for the Highlanders and looked to impose himself on the Blues. Whilst guilty of a couple of infringements, he was one of the better Highlanders forwards today.

3. Jeff Thwaites – 5.5/10

Wasn’t his best day out. While there was effort around the park, he was dominated at the set piece that set the tone for the Blues victory.

2. Ash Dixon (co-captain) – 6/10

As always, he was in the thick of it, yet his option taking today wasn’t always his best. Ran himself when deep on attack when he had numbers outside. Has had better matches this year.

1. Ayden Johnstone – 5.5/10 

Like Thwaites he was dominated up front, but that didn’t stop him from putting in a fair effort around the park.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDYCXVJAvag/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Replacements:

16. Liam Coltman – 5.5/10 – on the 58th

Was guilty of a poor throw when his side were deep on attack. Worked hard in tight but overall didn’t bring the impact desired.

17. Ethan de Groot – 5/10 – on in the 68th

Did his job.

18. Siate Tokolahi – 5/10 – on in the 51st

Did his best to secure the set piece but it was not his day.

19. Manaaki Selby-Rickit – 6.5/10 – on in the 51st

Brought some aggression and intent to the Highlanders and may have earned himself a start next week.

20 Jesse Parete – 6/10 – on the 68th

One of his better performances and was a handful at times when operating down the flanks.

21. Folau Fakatava – 5/10 – on in the 72nd

Was busy but his passing is erratic and stifled the attack at times.

22. Bryn Gatland – N/A

23. Jona Nareki 7.5/10 – on in the 57th

Was dangerous from the get-go. Should be starting for the Highlanders.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search