Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby Pacific introduces ‘lucky loser’ as part of new format for 2025

The Blues celebrate winning the Super Rugby Pacific Grand Final match between the Blues and Chiefs at Eden Park in Auckland on June 22, 2024. (Photo by MICHAEL BRADLEY / AFP) (Photo by MICHAEL BRADLEY/AFP via Getty Images)

Super Rugby Pacific will look fairly different in 2025 with 11 teams set to compete over an extended 16-round regular season. The Finals Series will also see the introduction of a “lucky loser” which offers a second chance to one of the teams who finish higher on the ladder.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Friday, SRP confirmed the 11 teams that will compete for championship glory in 2025. The ACT Brumbies, Blues, Chiefs, Crusaders, Fijian Drua, Highlanders, Hurricanes, Moana Pasifika, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds and Western Force will line up next season.

With the Melbourne Rebels no longer active in the competition, organisers have reduced the amount of teams that qualify for the playoffs from eight to six. The three-week Finals Series will include Qualifying Finals, Semi-Finals and the Grand Final.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the next round, as well as the “lucky loser” who will get another chance to challenge for the title. That side will be the highest-seeded losing team – one of the sides who place first, second, third or fourth on the ladder.

One semi-final will pit the top-seeded side against the fourth-seed, while second and third go head-to-head in the other elimination clash. The two victors will progress through to the Grand Final, with the higher seed set to host the big dance.

But, before all of that, rankings will be determined by a 16-round regular season, which will see each team play 14 matches and take two bye weeks. Each side will play seven home games and seven away fixtures during the regular season.

Next year’s SRP season will get underway on February 14, which is one week earlier than previous seasons. There will be three family-friendly Sunday afternoon games throughout the season, with competition organisers open to exploring more Sunday fixtures in the future

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re thrilled to reveal the revamped structure, some new features and the start date for the next season of Super Rugby Pacific,” Super Rugby Pacific CEO Jack Mesley said in a statement.

“The fans are always front of mind and while the full draw will be released soon, we wanted to give them an early insight into what they can look forward to in 2025.

“The introduction of three Sunday afternoon fixtures will make it easier for families to experience the excitement of the Super Rugby Pacific, and we can look to build on that offering in future seasons.

“We’re particularly excited about the new Finals Series, which is designed to produce highly competitive matchups while still rewarding the teams that finish at the top of the table.”

ADVERTISEMENT

FEATURES OF 2025 SUPER RUGBY PACIFIC

  • 11 teams
  • Teams will play 14 regular season matches, consisting of 7 home and 7 away matches
  • Teams will play four teams twice, with a focus on rivalry matches, and the six other teams once
  • The top six teams on the table at the end of the regular season qualify for the playoffs
  • Qualifying Finals will be 1 v 6, 2 v 5 and 3 v 4, with the higher-seeded sides to host. The three winners progress to the next round
  • They will be joined by a “lucky loser” – the highest-seeded losing team who will also progress through to the Semi-Finals
  • Semi-finals will be 1 v 4 and 2 v 3. The two winners of the Semi-Finals will qualify for the Grand Final

2025 SUPER RUGBY PACIFIC FINALS SERIES

FINALS WEEK ONE – QUALIFYING FINALS

1st seed vs 6th seed

2nd seed vs 5th seed

3rd seed vs 4th seed

FINALS WEEK TWO – SEMI-FINALS

1st seed vs 4th seed

2nd seed vs 3rd seed

FINALS WEEK THREE – GRAND FINAL

1st seed vs 2nd seed

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
T
Teddy 67 days ago

This looks like total dog shyte. The ABs can only go further backwards at this rate.


Any wonder their top dogs are stealing a living over in Japan.

P
Pabst 68 days ago

Lucky loser* should be the new name of the competition. What a mess…

B
B 69 days ago

As long as the competition is genuine in terms of physicality and skill sets.


The play off concept isn't anything new and looks pretty much like... the goal line drop out, 50-22 and TMO/Bunker that rugby union decided to copy from rugby league.


With that said, I'm looking forward to seeing the day when Rugby Union copies another Rugby League concept with a World Club Challenge Cup.


The winner of the Super Rugby Pacific plays the United Rugby Championship winner...

Alliance Stadium would be a good venue for starters.

R
RugCs 69 days ago

This is surely not a serious suggestion, is it?

S
SK 69 days ago

What nonsense. So if you finish first you cannot be eliminated in the qualifying phase. Even if you lost the match to 6th place you will go through as the lucky loser. You could lose the match on purpose or play a B team and lose just to ensure the 6th place side goes through instead of another higher ranked lucky loser.

R
RugCs 69 days ago

That would be funny. There is no sense in that, if a team based on log position cannot be eliminated from an elimination match then what the point of having an elimination match.

B
Bull Shark 69 days ago

Getting desperate.


Get 4 or 5 Japan teams in. Make it a 16 team knockout cup and move on. Ala the champions cup.


Final in a neutral stadium.


Shall I run the show for you guys?

W
Wayneo 69 days ago

🙄

Super Participation Trophy Rugby.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tupou Vaa'i gives first impression of 'big unit' Fabian Holland Tupou Vaa'i on 'big unit' Fabian Holland
Search