Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby Power Rankings Week 1: Can Anyone Beat the Brumbies?

brum

Jamie Wall attempts to make sense of the first round of Super Rugby results for 2016.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much has been talked about the confusing system of Super Rugby 2016, so it’s better to have one definitive ranking system. This week it relies on upsets, mascots and the addition of foreign language to make post-match interviews worth tuning into for once.

1. BrumbiesCanberra’s a boring place apparently, so the Brumbies had nothing better to do in the off-season than plot their revenge for their semi loss to the Hurricanes last year. Statement well and truly made with a 42 point torching of a team that was on most people’s picks to win the whole thing.

2. Chiefs – If they can stay healthy, they’ll be in at the business end. It was the #DMac show in Christchurch, with last year’s break-out star Damian McKenzie running the show and constantly grinning like Mac Tonight when he lined up shots at goal.

Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 1.37.54 PM

3. Blues – Turning things around in one off-season isn’t unprecedented in Super Rugby (see the Hurricanes in 2015), but it would be good if we could see more jumping up and down from Blues players. OK, it’s one game…but that was the defending champs they just iced.

4. Waratahs – They get talked up every year, but with good reason because the Tahs are flat out stacked. The Reds aren’t great, but a win in the biggest rivalry in Aussie sport is nothing to be sniffed at.

ADVERTISEMENT

5. Jaguares – The new boys put a smile on everyone except Cheetahs fans’ faces with an open and ultimately successful effort. It also seems their team translator isn’t quite up with the play on inane post-match interview questions, which led to half of them having to be repeated and an exasperated commentator basically kicking him off the stage.

6. Stormers – The merits of the South African conference have been blasted, but the fact remains that the Stormers did make it through to the playoffs last year. The Bulls aren’t a completely terrible side, so dishing out hidings like this will mean at least one team will have to travel to Cape Town for a sudden death match.

7. Crusaders – They lost, but rumours of a post-Richie and Dan meltdown were unfounded in a fighting performance. The Crusaders should go alright this year, probably without having to resort to the old stop-and-point trickery Andy Ellis pulled out in the first half.

8. Sharks – The perennial underachievers thumped the Kings and still made it look pretty boring.

ADVERTISEMENT

9. Sunwolves – OK, so now we realise why SANZAR wanted these guys in the comp so badly: all those not-empty seats. Despite a loss, they played well enough to engender some support from the wider public, plus introduced us to the second scariest mascot in rugby after the Harbour Master.

pinging

10. Rebels – If you don’t want to move all the way to the Northern Hemisphere you can go to Melbourne to prolong your career. Bonus: no one’s expecting anything of you.

11. HighlandersWhat Blake Gibson did to Ben Smith in the first half of their eventual loss pretty much sums it up. Guess what boys: everyone knows you’re the team to beat now.

12. Lions – Ranked below the team they beat due to the decision to put the not-so-iconic Johannesburg skyline on their jersey.

13. Cheetahs – Scored a bunch of points but clearly have stuck to their franchise core value of not hiring a defensive coach, as well as throwing the worst forward pass in the competition’s history.

14. Bulls – They’ll be sweet once Handre Pollard comes back from injury. Oh wait, he’s not.

15. RedsRob Simmons dropping an F-bomb was probably their only highlight.

16. Force – Perth is out of the way for every team in the comp, so it’s nice to know the Force will let you win once you get there.

17. Kings – Super Rugby probably didn’t need argyle jerseys.

18. Hurricanes – From all but champs to nothing but chumps. File their pre season training reality show in the ‘fiction’ section, by the looks of it any fitness they were filmed doing must have been CGI.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search