Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby right to cull numbers - White

Jake White /Getty

World Cup-winning coach Jake White has backed SANZAAR’s decision to cut two South African teams from Super Rugby, citing it as a possible “catalyst” to boost the Springboks’ fortunes.

SANZAAR announced plans last week to axe three clubs from the current 18-team format for the 2018 season, with one coming from Australia and two from South Africa.

That means all five New Zealand franchises remain, as do Jaguares from Argentina, and Sunwolves from Japan – although the latter will move to the Australian conference from next season.

Rebels and Western Force have been named as the two sides being considered for removal by the Australian Rugby Union, but the six South African teams will have to wait until June to discover their fate.

Some have criticised the decision to change the competition, but White – who guided the Springboks to World Cup glory in 2007 and has coached Brumbies and Sharks in Super Rugby – believes it is the right move to help improve the standard of competition.

In particular White hopes the trimming of South African sides will help increase competitiveness, which should in turn raise standards and help the national team.

“Reducing the number of Super Rugby teams is a great decision and it may be the catalyst for South African rugby to lead the way again,” White wrote in All Out Rugby.

“I’m not sure that the solutions that the SANZAAR partners will come up with are going to be the right ones, but the main thing is they’ve recognised that, among several issues, the tournament is unfair, depending on which pool you’re in and how many games you play away from home.

“The competition organisers are sitting on a pile of historical data which shows that when it was Super 6, Super 10 and Super 12, those were very, very good tournaments.

“At the start, we didn’t have franchises like the Stormers, Lions and the Highlanders, it was Western Province, Transvaal and Otago. Most of the guys who played for South Africa in the 1995 Rugby World Cup were with Kitch Christie at Transvaal in those days.

“People often don’t want to hear ‘in the old days’, but the point is that the history of this competition shows that was a great product.

“This Super Rugby trim will obviously be very distressing for the people who stand to lose their jobs, but in all fairness, I think most would agree that there should never have been an expansion of the competition.

“The decision-makers have taken on board what they’ve heard from the stakeholders and, in this case, the message is clear – less is more.”

And White has suggested a shake-up of South Africa’s sides might be in order, rather than just cutting two teams.

“The real debate should be around how we will package those four Super Rugby teams from a South African point of view,” he added.

“Our decision-makers mustn’t be scared to look at change if it means it’s going to help the Springboks in the long-term. 

“And that’s what makes me think this change may be the first step in South African rugby taking great strides forward.”

South Africa have slipped to seventh in the world rankings.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 21 minutes ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

I thought we made a lot of progress against that type of defence by the WC last year. Lots of direct running and punching holes rather than using width. Against that type of defence I think you have to be looking to kick on first phase when you have front foot ball which we did relatively successfully. We are playing a lot of rugby behind the gain line at the moment. They are looking for those little interchanges for soft shoulders and fast ball or off loads but it regularly turns into them battering away with slow ball and going backwards, then putting in a very rushed kick under huge pressure.


JB brought that dimension when he first moved into 12 a couple of years ago but he's definitely not been at his best this year. I don't know if it is because he is being asked to play a narrow role, or carrying a niggle or two, but he does not look confident to me. He had that clean break on the weekend and stood there like he was a prop who found himself in open space and didn't know what to do with the ball. He is still a good first phase ball carrier though, they use him a lot off the line out to set up fast clean ball, but I don't think anyone is particularly clear on what they are supposed to do at that point. He was used really successfully as a second playmaker last year but I don't think he's been at that role once this year. He is a triple threat player but playing a very 1 dimensional role at the moment. He and Reiko have been absolutely rock solid on defence which is why I don't think there will be too much experimentation or changes there.

41 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'World-class finisher' offers All Blacks selection solution Mark Tele'a scores a double at Allianz Stadium
Search