Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Super Rugby star highlights how Australian sides can beat Kiwi teams this season

(Photo by Jeremy Ng/Getty Images)

A Super Rugby Pacific star has outlined how the Australian teams can beat their Kiwi counterparts in the competition later this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New Zealand sides are highly favoured to dominate the Australian franchises when they do battle in a few weeks’ time after having done so in recent editions of Super Rugby.

In years gone by, the Blues, Chiefs, Hurricanes, Crusaders and Highlanders have enjoyed a high level of success against their trans-Tasman rivals, which peaked between 2016 and 2018 when they went 40 games without loss against the Brumbies, Reds, Waratahs, Rebels and Force.

Video Spacer

Why the Brumbies are the team to beat in Super Rugby Pacific | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Why the Brumbies are the team to beat in Super Rugby Pacific | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

That disparity came under the microscope again last year after the Brumbies and Reds were the only Australian teams to register victories against Kiwi sides, with each franchise winning a game apiece from 25 total matches throughout the competition.

While cross-border matches are yet to take place this season due to the Covid-enforced rescheduling of multiple fixtures, the Kiwi outfits are expected to continue their dominance over the Australians when they begin to square off from April 22 onwards.

However, Crusaders halfback Bryn Hall has illustrated what the Australian teams need to do in order to buck the trend and push for places in the Super Rugby Pacific quarter-finals in the upcoming rounds.

Speaking on the Aotearoa Rugby Pod, Hall highlighted a key difference between the matches played in New Zealand and Australia thus far in Super Rugby Pacific.

ADVERTISEMENT

The five-time title-winning Maori All Black noted that matches played between Kiwi teams have averaged a ball-in-play time of about 39-40 minutes, up to eight minutes longer than that of matches played in Australia.

According to Hall, those figures reflect that New Zealand teams play a faster brand of rugby than the Australian sides, who he said must adapt to that style of play if they are to beat the Kiwi franchises over the next couple of months.

“One stat that one of our analysis guys brought up was just around the difference in ball-in-play, the difference between Super Rugby Aotearoa and Super Rugby AU,” Hall said, referencing the New Zealand and Australian teams in Super Rugby Pacific.

“At the moment, the ball-in-play in New Zealand games is roughly 39-40 minutes in games… in the Australian games, there’s only been one game that’s been at that 38 minutes level of ball-in-play.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s pretty much at that 32-minute mark of ball-in-play, so I think the ability of the Australian teams to be able to adapt and play more of a high-tempo game of [making] more tackles, having the ball in play and under that fatigue, I think that’s going to be a crucial part for the Australian teams moving forward because the ball is in play a lot more for New Zealand teams.

Related

“Four-to-five minutes might not seem a lot for our viewers, but, actually, as players, having that extra time in game is actually a big part of running more metres, having longer phase counts and putting teams under more pressure.

“I think if the Australians can adapt to that when they do play the New Zealand teams, it’ll set them up really well to maybe get results in the back part of the year.”

Hall added that, of the Australian teams, the table-topping Brumbies loom as the strongest contenders to challenge the New Zealand sides after navigating the first six rounds of Super Rugby Pacific without defeat.

“I think the balance around their game is where I’m most impressed with them,” Hall told the Aotearoa Rugby Pod.

“Set piece-wise, they’ve got the ability to go to their lineout maul which has been a weapon for them over the years.

“They scrummage well but, I think as well, when they get their backs in the game, whether that be Tom Banks or Tom Wright, the amount of pace and x-factor they have out wide, they do it really well when they get the opportunities to be able to get there.

“I think their physicality in the breakdown as well, when they’re getting those big [ball-carrying] forwards going forward and on top of teams, it’s bringing the likes of Tom Wright, and their midfield pairings as well, to be able to have opportunities and being able to attack in their phase-play shape.

“They are sitting nicely and, I guess for them, it’s being able to accumulate as many points as they [can] – which they have, they’re undefeated – and then it gives them really good confidence [to beat] us New Zealand teams at the backend of the competition.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 59 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search